NextEnergy Solar Fund Limited
NextEnergy Solar Fund Limited NESF.L Peers
See (NESF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NESF.L | $65.30 | -1.51% | 375.6M | 65.30 | $0.01 | +12.71% |
| CNDX.L | $1,221.00 | +0.69% | 21T | 32.94 | $37.06 | N/A |
| UC65.L | $59.96 | +2.82% | 5T | N/A | N/A | +1.72% |
| UB02.L | $4,436.50 | +2.65% | 3.7T | N/A | N/A | +1.84% |
| IUSA.L | $4,352.88 | +1.64% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.11% |
| SSAC.L | $6,923.00 | +1.42% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | $40,675.00 | +2.11% | 974.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | $7,300.00 | +1.23% | 849.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | $4,787.50 | +1.85% | 798.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.78% |
| XESC.L | $7,881.00 | +1.76% | 797.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NESF.L vs CNDX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CNDX.L has a market cap of 21T. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CNDX.L trades at $1,221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CNDX.L's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CNDX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UC65.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UC65.L trades at $59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UB02.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UB02.L trades at $4,436.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IUSA.L trades at $4,352.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SSAC.L trades at $6,923.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 974.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while EQGB.L trades at $40,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 849.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SMEA.L trades at $7,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XESX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 798.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XESX.L trades at $4,787.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XESC.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 797.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XESC.L trades at $7,881.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 765.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while MEUD.L trades at $22,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IITU.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 749B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IITU.L trades at $2,457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 697.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while JPSR.L trades at $2,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 682B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UB0D.L trades at $2,183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs JT13.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 669.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while JT13.L trades at $596.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 623B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CNAL.L trades at $11,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 555.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IWRD.L trades at $6,108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 548.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XDAX.L trades at $19,066.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 496.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while PHGP.L trades at $22,721.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 483.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while GLDA.L trades at $9,674.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 474.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XMMS.L trades at $4,589.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 466.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while MXWS.L trades at $8,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 441.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XMUS.L trades at $12,973.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UC44.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 429.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UC44.L trades at $12,679.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 423.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XMEU.L trades at $8,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CS51.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 418.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CS51.L trades at $17,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs EUE.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 374.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while EUE.L trades at $4,674.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 360B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IEEM.L trades at $3,373.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CACX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 342.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CACX.L trades at $6,614.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UB32.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 339.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UB32.L trades at $8,573.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 306.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XSX6.L trades at $11,724.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 298.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SEMA.L trades at $3,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 294.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IWFQ.L trades at $5,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 294.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while GBSS.L trades at $22,373.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 271.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IWFV.L trades at $3,582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 270.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SGBX.L trades at $23,353.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 246.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while ISPY.L trades at $2,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CEA1.L trades at $14,356.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 226.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while RBTX.L trades at $1,053.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs JERE.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 223.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while JERE.L trades at $3,909.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 221.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CPJ1.L trades at $14,905.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 221.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while JRDE.L trades at $3,671.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SUES.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 214.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SUES.L trades at $584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 202.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IUQF.L trades at $1,091.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 197.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IWFM.L trades at $6,459.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while HMEF.L trades at $859.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 190.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while PHSP.L trades at $2,236.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 183.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XDEV.L trades at $3,685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SOYU.L trades at $306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 169.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CEUR.L trades at $30,942.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 169.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UIFS.L trades at $1,092.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XXSC.L trades at $5,426.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 162.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SPGP.L trades at $1,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 158.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XDEQ.L trades at $5,332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 148.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while PRIR.L trades at $1,458.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while GBSP.L trades at $1,698.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CU1.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CU1.L trades at $44,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IEFV.L trades at $859.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 139.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while ISP6.L trades at $6,376.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IPRP.L trades at $2,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs WATL.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while WATL.L trades at $5,737.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs GILS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while GILS.L trades at $10,048.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XZEU.L trades at $2,809.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CUS1.L trades at $37,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XCX6.L trades at $1,297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while 0GWB.IL trades at $501.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs INFL.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while INFL.L trades at $9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CG1.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CG1.L trades at $36,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UC79.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 119B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UC79.L trades at $1,084.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SP5G.L trades at $199.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 62.27. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CB5.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CB5.L trades at $3,859.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XRSG.L trades at $22,614.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CSPX.L trades at $628.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IJPN.L trades at $1,409.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IGSG.L trades at $5,821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SPEX.L trades at $4,402.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs SPES.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while SPES.L trades at $4,157.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XDEM.L trades at $5,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IEUX.L trades at $4,073.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while RIEG.L trades at $1,445.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs H50E.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while H50E.L trades at $4,865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while PRIC.L trades at $1,591.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while JRDM.L trades at $2,282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 103.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IWDA.L trades at $112.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while DAXX.L trades at $18,616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IMV.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IMV.L trades at $5,783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CSCA.L trades at $16,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs UB45.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while UB45.L trades at $6,169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while PRIJ.L trades at $2,430.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while MTIX.L trades at $13,942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IUKD.L trades at $834.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while WQDS.L trades at $547.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XDN0.L trades at $4,191.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 88.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while EQDS.L trades at $547.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XLKQ.L trades at $50,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs COMM.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while COMM.L trades at $533.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CRPX.L trades at $12,794.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while IGUS.L trades at $13,459.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while XDEB.L trades at $3,611.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.
NESF.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
NESF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NESF.L stands at 375.6M. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NESF.L is priced at $65.30, while CSP1.L trades at $46,491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NESF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 65.30, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NESF.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NESF.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NESF.L.