Nearmap Ltd
Nearmap Ltd NEAPF Peers
See (NEAPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEAPF | $1.36 | N/A | 0 | -45.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $65.76 | +0.60% | 602.3B | 23.15 | $2.84 | +0.88% |
| TCTZF | $65.97 | N/A | 600.8B | 23.23 | $2.84 | +0.87% |
| PROSY | $10.21 | -0.58% | 117.5B | 16.21 | $0.63 | +0.22% |
| PROSF | $52.69 | +0.01% | 115.2B | 16.62 | $3.17 | +0.21% |
| NAPRF | $295.00 | N/A | 48.3B | 16.05 | $18.38 | +0.22% |
| NPSNY | $57.84 | +0.59% | 47.3B | 15.72 | $3.68 | +0.16% |
| BAIDF | $10.50 | +8.25% | 29.5B | 8.33 | $1.26 | N/A |
| YAHOF | $4.05 | N/A | 28.9B | 27.00 | $0.15 | +1.15% |
| KSHTY | $1.26 | -2.33% | 26.6B | 12.60 | $0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NEAPF vs TCEHY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 602.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while TCEHY trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs TCTZF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 600.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while TCTZF trades at $65.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs PROSY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while PROSY trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs PROSF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while PROSF trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs NAPRF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while NAPRF trades at $295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs NPSNY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while NPSNY trades at $57.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs BAIDF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while BAIDF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs YAHOF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while YAHOF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs KSHTY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while KSHTY trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs KUASF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while KUASF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs RPGRY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RPGRY trades at $41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 54.76. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs RPGRF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs NHNCF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and NHNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs ADEVF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs ATDRF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ATDRF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ATDRY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ATDRY trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ADEVY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs CSXXY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while CSXXY trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 53.61. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs RTMVY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RTMVY trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs RTMVF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RTMVF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs SKLTF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SKLTF trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 164.63. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs CHLLF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while CHLLF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs KKKUF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while KKKUF trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs OOOOF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs HMNTY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while HMNTY trades at $33.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs MEIUF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs DHGAF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs MLRYY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs XINXF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs PTOVF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, PTOVF has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while PTOVF trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas PTOVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTOVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to PTOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ADBMF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs WNWSF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ZGXNF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs FRRGF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs VYGPF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs MECVF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs UUMMF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs OPNDF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs TGRVF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs NXCLF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs CKPDY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs CPADF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while CPADF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs RSTN Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ZMDTF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ZMDTF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs MSEZ Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MSEZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs BBUZ Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while BBUZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs SABOF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SABOF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs RDLYF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs PXSTF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while PXSTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and PXSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs PRSNF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs NIROF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs EGLXF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while EGLXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs HYPPF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs BBTVF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs SFUNY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and SFUNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs BMTM Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while BMTM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs YOOIF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while YOOIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs GIFX Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while GIFX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs NUGL Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs CRTDW Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs LBUY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while LBUY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs QQQFF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while QQQFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs GOGY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs APMLF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 923.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs LTCP Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 839.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs SPFYF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 819.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs MRNJ Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs MRPT Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 752.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MRPT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs VMSI Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 607.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs CYAP Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs ILIM Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and ILIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs RBDC Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs LKST Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 406K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while LKST trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -12.28. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and LKST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs DGTHF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs FMHS Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 267.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while FMHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and FMHS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs DATI Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 161.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while DATI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and DATI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs SEEK Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs KIWB Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs QTTOY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while QTTOY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ZONX Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs OTTV Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs LHGI Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs SLNM Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs HUTN Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs ROII Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs REDFY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs RWRDP Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and RWRDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs DELCF Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and DELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs BTIM Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and BTIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs PIKL Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs ISHM Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs SHGY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs MDAW Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs LOCM Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs LOVLQ Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs ZZLL Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs FRFR Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.
NEAPF vs INTH Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NEAPF vs ABBY Comparison
NEAPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEAPF stands at 0. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEAPF is priced at $1.36, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -45.33, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEAPF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEAPF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEAPF.