BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc.
BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc. (NCBDY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCBDY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCBDY | $16.35 | -0.24% | 42.7B | 24.50 | $0.67 | +0.80% |
| OLCLF | $23.74 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 46.55 | $0.51 | +0.40% |
| CUKPF | $27.10 | +0.00% | 38.8B | 14.19 | $1.91 | N/A |
| ANPDF | $12.75 | +9.44% | 35.4B | 16.78 | $0.76 | +2.37% |
| OLCLY | $21.15 | +1.00% | 35.3B | 42.28 | $0.51 | +0.36% |
| ANPDY | $294.88 | +0.77% | 32.9B | 15.58 | $18.90 | +2.57% |
| NCBDF | $33.13 | +10.43% | 21.1B | 24.54 | $1.35 | +1.44% |
| SHMDF | $121.75 | -12.65% | 10.7B | 44.11 | $2.76 | +1.71% |
| SMNNY | $11.33 | -12.98% | 9.9B | 40.18 | $0.28 | N/A |
| GMWKF | $218.65 | +0.08% | 7.2B | 27.43 | $7.97 | +3.53% |
Stock Comparison
NCBDY vs OLCLF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while OLCLF trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check OLCLF's competition here
NCBDY vs CUKPF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CUKPF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CUKPF's competition here
NCBDY vs ANPDF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while ANPDF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to ANPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check ANPDF's competition here
NCBDY vs OLCLY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while OLCLY trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check OLCLY's competition here
NCBDY vs ANPDY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while ANPDY trades at $294.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY and ANPDY have similar daily volatility (1.04).Check ANPDY's competition here
NCBDY vs NCBDF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while NCBDF trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to NCBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check NCBDF's competition here
NCBDY vs SHMDF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while SHMDF trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to SHMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check SHMDF's competition here
NCBDY vs SMNNY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while SMNNY trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check SMNNY's competition here
NCBDY vs GMWKF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while GMWKF trades at $218.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check GMWKF's competition here
NCBDY vs THUPY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while THUPY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check THUPY's competition here
NCBDY vs LNNGF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while LNNGF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check LNNGF's competition here
NCBDY vs LNNGY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while LNNGY trades at $53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check LNNGY's competition here
NCBDY vs THLPF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check THLPF's competition here
NCBDY vs YAMCF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while YAMCF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check YAMCF's competition here
NCBDY vs NINOY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while NINOY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 82.28. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check NINOY's competition here
NCBDY vs YAMCY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while YAMCY trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check YAMCY's competition here
NCBDY vs NINOF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check NINOF's competition here
NCBDY vs TCCHF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to TCCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check TCCHF's competition here
NCBDY vs TOMYY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check TOMYY's competition here
NCBDY vs RNDOF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check RNDOF's competition here
NCBDY vs BSFFF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BSFFF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 201.79. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BSFFF's competition here
NCBDY vs SNMSF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while SNMSF trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check SNMSF's competition here
NCBDY vs YONXF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to YONXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check YONXF's competition here
NCBDY vs CTVIF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CTVIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CTVIF's competition here
NCBDY vs DTCGF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check DTCGF's competition here
NCBDY vs DRMMF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while DRMMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check DRMMF's competition here
NCBDY vs CLPIF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CLPIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to CLPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CLPIF's competition here
NCBDY vs MPZAF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 81.09. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check MPZAF's competition here
NCBDY vs HRVFF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while HRVFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check HRVFF's competition here
NCBDY vs HISJF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to HISJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check HISJF's competition here
NCBDY vs MPZAY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check MPZAY's competition here
NCBDY vs BTEAF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to BTEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BTEAF's competition here
NCBDY vs TNIEF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while TNIEF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check TNIEF's competition here
NCBDY vs SHOFF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while SHOFF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to SHOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check SHOFF's competition here
NCBDY vs UETMF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 558.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check UETMF's competition here
NCBDY vs VVCHF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while VVCHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to VVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check VVCHF's competition here
NCBDY vs CLKXF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CLKXF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to CLKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CLKXF's competition here
NCBDY vs OQLGF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to OQLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check OQLGF's competition here
NCBDY vs GYYMF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to GYYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check GYYMF's competition here
NCBDY vs GBBYF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check GBBYF's competition here
NCBDY vs FOCIF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to FOCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check FOCIF's competition here
NCBDY vs PYHOF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check PYHOF's competition here
NCBDY vs RPNMF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check RPNMF's competition here
NCBDY vs KICK Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check KICK's competition here
NCBDY vs BOLL Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to BOLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BOLL's competition here
NCBDY vs PMTYF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while PMTYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to PMTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check PMTYF's competition here
NCBDY vs CGROF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CGROF's competition here
NCBDY vs GFIZF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to GFIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check GFIZF's competition here
NCBDY vs CNLFF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CNLFF's competition here
NCBDY vs PRKA Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while PRKA trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check PRKA's competition here
NCBDY vs KENS Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while KENS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KENS's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to KENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check KENS's competition here
NCBDY vs DSHK Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check DSHK's competition here
NCBDY vs TOYRF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while TOYRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check TOYRF's competition here
NCBDY vs BWMG Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BWMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWMG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BWMG's competition here
NCBDY vs PFFEF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to PFFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check PFFEF's competition here
NCBDY vs VIRA Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to VIRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check VIRA's competition here
NCBDY vs GTHKF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check GTHKF's competition here
NCBDY vs QRSM Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to QRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check QRSM's competition here
NCBDY vs BTDG Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BTDG's competition here
NCBDY vs BFXXQ Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to BFXXQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BFXXQ's competition here
NCBDY vs MSET Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to MSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check MSET's competition here
NCBDY vs SPQS Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check SPQS's competition here
NCBDY vs TRBX Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to TRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check TRBX's competition here
NCBDY vs VMHG Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 152.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check VMHG's competition here
NCBDY vs XFTB Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to XFTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check XFTB's competition here
NCBDY vs VTMB Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check VTMB's competition here
NCBDY vs ECMH Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check ECMH's competition here
NCBDY vs DAAT Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to DAAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check DAAT's competition here
NCBDY vs ALTD Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to ALTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check ALTD's competition here
NCBDY vs OMWS Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check OMWS's competition here
NCBDY vs JMIH Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to JMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check JMIH's competition here
NCBDY vs GLFN Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to GLFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check GLFN's competition here
NCBDY vs LCLP Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to LCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check LCLP's competition here
NCBDY vs ROCLF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to ROCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check ROCLF's competition here
NCBDY vs PRXIQ Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to PRXIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check PRXIQ's competition here
NCBDY vs BYDC Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to BYDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check BYDC's competition here
NCBDY vs FTFY Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check FTFY's competition here
NCBDY vs CLVFA Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to CLVFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CLVFA's competition here
NCBDY vs CLUBQ Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to CLUBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check CLUBQ's competition here
NCBDY vs WMGPF Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to WMGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check WMGPF's competition here
NCBDY vs TVPC Comparison July 2025
NCBDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDY stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDY is priced at $16.35, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.50, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, NCBDY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDY is more volatile compared to TVPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDY.Check TVPC's competition here