BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc.
BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc. (NCBDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCBDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCBDF | $33.13 | +10.43% | 21.1B | 24.54 | $1.35 | +1.44% |
| NCBDY | $16.13 | -1.35% | 42.2B | 24.06 | $0.67 | +0.79% |
| OLCLF | $23.74 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 46.55 | $0.51 | +0.40% |
| CUKPF | $27.00 | -0.37% | 38.6B | 14.14 | $1.91 | N/A |
| ANPDF | $12.75 | +9.44% | 35.4B | 16.78 | $0.76 | +2.37% |
| OLCLY | $20.56 | -2.79% | 33.6B | 40.20 | $0.51 | +0.37% |
| ANPDY | $285.64 | -3.17% | 32B | 15.14 | $18.90 | +2.65% |
| SHMDF | $121.60 | -0.12% | 10.7B | 44.06 | $2.76 | +1.71% |
| SMNNY | $10.93 | -3.53% | 9.6B | 39.21 | $0.28 | N/A |
| GMWKF | $220.95 | +1.05% | 7.3B | 27.83 | $7.94 | +3.41% |
Stock Comparison
NCBDF vs NCBDY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while NCBDY trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check NCBDY's competition here
NCBDF vs OLCLF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while OLCLF trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check OLCLF's competition here
NCBDF vs CUKPF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CUKPF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and CUKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUKPF's competition here
NCBDF vs ANPDF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while ANPDF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and ANPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANPDF's competition here
NCBDF vs OLCLY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while OLCLY trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check OLCLY's competition here
NCBDF vs ANPDY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while ANPDY trades at $285.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check ANPDY's competition here
NCBDF vs SHMDF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while SHMDF trades at $121.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and SHMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHMDF's competition here
NCBDF vs SMNNY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while SMNNY trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check SMNNY's competition here
NCBDF vs GMWKF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while GMWKF trades at $220.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check GMWKF's competition here
NCBDF vs THUPY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while THUPY trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and THUPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THUPY's competition here
NCBDF vs LNNGF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while LNNGF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check LNNGF's competition here
NCBDF vs LNNGY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while LNNGY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check LNNGY's competition here
NCBDF vs THLPF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check THLPF's competition here
NCBDF vs YAMCF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while YAMCF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and YAMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMCF's competition here
NCBDF vs YAMCY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while YAMCY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check YAMCY's competition here
NCBDF vs NINOF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and NINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NINOF's competition here
NCBDF vs NINOY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while NINOY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 79.32. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check NINOY's competition here
NCBDF vs TCCHF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and TCCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCCHF's competition here
NCBDF vs TOMYY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check TOMYY's competition here
NCBDF vs RNDOF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check RNDOF's competition here
NCBDF vs BSFFF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BSFFF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is -403.57. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check BSFFF's competition here
NCBDF vs SNMSF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while SNMSF trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check SNMSF's competition here
NCBDF vs YONXF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and YONXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YONXF's competition here
NCBDF vs CTVIF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CTVIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check CTVIF's competition here
NCBDF vs DTCGF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check DTCGF's competition here
NCBDF vs DRMMF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while DRMMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check DRMMF's competition here
NCBDF vs CLPIF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CLPIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and CLPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPIF's competition here
NCBDF vs MPZAF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 81.09. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check MPZAF's competition here
NCBDF vs HRVFF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while HRVFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check HRVFF's competition here
NCBDF vs HISJF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and HISJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HISJF's competition here
NCBDF vs MPZAY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check MPZAY's competition here
NCBDF vs BTEAF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and BTEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEAF's competition here
NCBDF vs TNIEF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while TNIEF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check TNIEF's competition here
NCBDF vs SHOFF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 638.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while SHOFF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and SHOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHOFF's competition here
NCBDF vs UETMF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 558.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check UETMF's competition here
NCBDF vs VVCHF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while VVCHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and VVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VVCHF's competition here
NCBDF vs CLKXF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CLKXF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and CLKXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLKXF's competition here
NCBDF vs OQLGF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and OQLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OQLGF's competition here
NCBDF vs GYYMF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and GYYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYYMF's competition here
NCBDF vs GBBYF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check GBBYF's competition here
NCBDF vs FOCIF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and FOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOCIF's competition here
NCBDF vs PYHOF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check PYHOF's competition here
NCBDF vs RPNMF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check RPNMF's competition here
NCBDF vs KICK Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check KICK's competition here
NCBDF vs PMTYF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while PMTYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and PMTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMTYF's competition here
NCBDF vs BOLL Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and BOLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLL's competition here
NCBDF vs CGROF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check CGROF's competition here
NCBDF vs GFIZF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and GFIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFIZF's competition here
NCBDF vs CNLFF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check CNLFF's competition here
NCBDF vs PRKA Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while PRKA trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check PRKA's competition here
NCBDF vs KENS Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while KENS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KENS's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and KENS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KENS's competition here
NCBDF vs DSHK Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check DSHK's competition here
NCBDF vs BWMG Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BWMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWMG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check BWMG's competition here
NCBDF vs PFFEF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and PFFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFFEF's competition here
NCBDF vs VIRA Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and VIRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIRA's competition here
NCBDF vs GTHKF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check GTHKF's competition here
NCBDF vs TOYRF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while TOYRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check TOYRF's competition here
NCBDF vs QRSM Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and QRSM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QRSM's competition here
NCBDF vs BTDG Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check BTDG's competition here
NCBDF vs BFXXQ Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and BFXXQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFXXQ's competition here
NCBDF vs MSET Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and MSET have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSET's competition here
NCBDF vs SPQS Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check SPQS's competition here
NCBDF vs TRBX Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and TRBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRBX's competition here
NCBDF vs VMHG Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 154.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check VMHG's competition here
NCBDF vs XFTB Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and XFTB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XFTB's competition here
NCBDF vs VTMB Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check VTMB's competition here
NCBDF vs ECMH Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check ECMH's competition here
NCBDF vs DAAT Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and DAAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAAT's competition here
NCBDF vs ALTD Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and ALTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTD's competition here
NCBDF vs OMWS Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check OMWS's competition here
NCBDF vs JMIH Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and JMIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMIH's competition here
NCBDF vs GLFN Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and GLFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLFN's competition here
NCBDF vs LCLP Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and LCLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCLP's competition here
NCBDF vs ROCLF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and ROCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROCLF's competition here
NCBDF vs PRXIQ Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and PRXIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRXIQ's competition here
NCBDF vs BYDC Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and BYDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYDC's competition here
NCBDF vs FTFY Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCBDF.Check FTFY's competition here
NCBDF vs TVPC Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and TVPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVPC's competition here
NCBDF vs CLUBQ Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and CLUBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLUBQ's competition here
NCBDF vs CLVFA Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and CLVFA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLVFA's competition here
NCBDF vs WMGPF Comparison August 2025
NCBDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCBDF stands at 21.1B. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCBDF is priced at $33.13, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCBDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.54, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCBDF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NCBDF and WMGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WMGPF's competition here