Nippon Building Fund Incorporation

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 56.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DLR trades at $166.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 158.68. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 55.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DLR-PJ trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 54.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DLR-PK trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while ARE trades at $73.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while BXP trades at $64.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 719.89. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, GECFF has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while GECFF trades at $98.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas GECFF's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GECFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to GECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while VNO-PL trades at $17.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while VNO-PM trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while VNO trades at $37.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 925.75. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DLR-PL trades at $20.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, JREIF has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while JREIF trades at $740.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas JREIF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JREIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and JREIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CUZ trades at $27.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 84.23. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, KPDCF has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while KPDCF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas KPDCF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KPDCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to KPDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while SLG-PI trades at $21.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while SLG trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is 654.41. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, MRVGF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while MRVGF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas MRVGF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRVGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to MRVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while KRC trades at $31.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, IMQCF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while IMQCF trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas IMQCF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMQCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to IMQCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, ORXJF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while ORXJF trades at $1,245.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas ORXJF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORXJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to ORXJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while VNO-PN trades at $16.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while HIW trades at $29.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CDP trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while VNO-PO trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DWVYF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DWVYF trades at $22.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DWVYF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DWVYF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and DWVYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, KREVF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while KREVF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas KREVF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KREVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to KREVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DEI trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 108.81. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while OGCP trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and OGCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while FISK trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while ESBA trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and ESBA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CLI trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while HPP-PC trades at $12.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -103.55. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, GPEAF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while GPEAF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas GPEAF's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPEAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to GPEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, APYRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while APYRF trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas APYRF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to APYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while WRE trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while ELME trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -105.97. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, WKPPF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while WKPPF trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas WKPPF's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WKPPF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to WKPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while JBGS trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 996.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while PGRE trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -14.66. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 944.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DEA trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 806.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while PDM trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 772.05M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CIO-PA trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 704.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while BDN trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CXP trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, ALSRF has a market cap of 678.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while ALSRF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas ALSRF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALSRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and ALSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 451.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while NLOP trades at $30.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, NIUWF has a market cap of 447.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while NIUWF trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas NIUWF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIUWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and NIUWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 314.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while HPP trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 298.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while PSTL trades at $12.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 197.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CIO trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DRETF has a market cap of 178.66M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DRETF trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DRETF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRETF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and DRETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while EQC trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 156.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while FSP trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 112.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while ONL trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, TUERF has a market cap of 77.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while TUERF trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas TUERF's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TUERF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and TUERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 29.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while NYC trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, SLTTF has a market cap of 27.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while SLTTF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas SLTTF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLTTF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to SLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, IVREF has a market cap of 22.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while IVREF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas IVREF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVREF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to IVREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 22.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while OPINL trades at $8.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 22.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while OPI trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CMCT trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584442.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, PRLE has a market cap of 13142.00. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while PRLE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas PRLE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRLE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF and PRLE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, DTLA-P comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, CMCTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.

NBFJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBFJF stands at 7.66B. In comparison, OFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NBFJF is priced at $900.63, while OFC trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBFJF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.77, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NBFJF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFJF is less volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFJF.