MTU Aero Engines AG
MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTUAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUAF | $456.15 | +0.00% | 24.9B | 25.60 | $18.06 | +0.48% |
| EADSF | $214.77 | +0.36% | 172.6B | 30.09 | $7.25 | +1.56% |
| EADSY | $53.45 | +0.01% | 171.4B | 30.06 | $1.81 | +1.56% |
| SAFRF | $341.36 | +0.00% | 143.9B | 28.42 | $12.08 | +0.89% |
| SAFRY | $85.62 | +0.00% | 142.9B | 28.23 | $3.02 | +0.95% |
| RYCEY | $15.13 | +0.00% | 124.1B | 15.98 | $0.92 | +0.92% |
| RYCEF | $14.92 | +0.00% | 123.4B | 15.89 | $0.92 | +0.96% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 109B | 0.28 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RNMBF | $1,907.50 | +0.00% | 85.9B | 86.17 | $21.75 | +0.44% |
| RNMBY | $382.89 | +0.00% | 83.2B | 87.90 | $4.30 | +0.48% |
Stock Comparison
MTUAF vs EADSF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 172.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while EADSF trades at $214.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EADSF's competition here
MTUAF vs EADSY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 171.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while EADSY trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EADSY's competition here
MTUAF vs SAFRF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SAFRF trades at $341.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAFRF's competition here
MTUAF vs SAFRY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SAFRY trades at $85.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAFRY's competition here
MTUAF vs RYCEY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RYCEY trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RYCEY's competition here
MTUAF vs RYCEF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RYCEF trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RYCEF's competition here
MTUAF vs RLLCF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RLLCF's competition here
MTUAF vs RNMBF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RNMBF trades at $1,907.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 86.17. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RNMBF's competition here
MTUAF vs RNMBY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RNMBY trades at $382.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 87.90. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RNMBY's competition here
MTUAF vs BAESY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BAESY trades at $97.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BAESY's competition here
MTUAF vs BAESF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BAESF trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BAESF's competition here
MTUAF vs FINMY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while FINMY trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FINMY's competition here
MTUAF vs THLLY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while THLLY trades at $55.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 46.51. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check THLLY's competition here
MTUAF vs THLEF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while THLEF trades at $269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check THLEF's competition here
MTUAF vs FINMF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while FINMF trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FINMF's competition here
MTUAF vs SAABY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SAABY trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 53.26. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAABY's competition here
MTUAF vs SAABF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SAABF trades at $54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 53.98. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAABF's competition here
MTUAF vs NSKFF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while NSKFF trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NSKFF's competition here
MTUAF vs DUAVF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while DUAVF trades at $320.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check DUAVF's competition here
MTUAF vs MTUAY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MTUAY trades at $227.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MTUAY's competition here
MTUAF vs SGGKF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SGGKF trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SGGKF's competition here
MTUAF vs SGGKY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SGGKY trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SGGKY's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRXF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BDRXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRXF's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRPF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BDRPF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRPF's competition here
MTUAF vs BOMBF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BOMBF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BOMBF's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRAF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BDRAF trades at $119.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRAF's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRBF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BDRBF trades at $119.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRBF's competition here
MTUAF vs HAGHY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while HAGHY trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 110.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HAGHY's competition here
MTUAF vs HNSDF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while HNSDF trades at $98.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 108.26. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HNSDF's competition here
MTUAF vs YSHLF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while YSHLF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check YSHLF's competition here
MTUAF vs ACLIF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ACLIF trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 50.83. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ACLIF's competition here
MTUAF vs ACLLY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ACLLY trades at $91.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 49.65. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ACLLY's competition here
MTUAF vs FNCNF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while FNCNF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FNCNF's competition here
MTUAF vs SMBMY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SMBMY trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SMBMY's competition here
MTUAF vs SMBMF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SMBMF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SMBMF's competition here
MTUAF vs AVIJF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while AVIJF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AVIJF's competition here
MTUAF vs MDALF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MDALF trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MDALF's competition here
MTUAF vs QNTQY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while QNTQY trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check QNTQY's competition here
MTUAF vs QNTQF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while QNTQF trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check QNTQF's competition here
MTUAF vs LSIIF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while LSIIF trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check LSIIF's competition here
MTUAF vs CMGMF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while CMGMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CMGMF's competition here
MTUAF vs CMGMY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while CMGMY trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CMGMY's competition here
MTUAF vs AUTLF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while AUTLF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AUTLF's competition here
MTUAF vs GGRGF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check GGRGF's competition here
MTUAF vs ATROB Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ATROB trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -295.45. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ATROB's competition here
MTUAF vs CZGZF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while CZGZF trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CZGZF's competition here
MTUAF vs MIESY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MIESY's competition here
MTUAF vs SNIRF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SNIRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SNIRF's competition here
MTUAF vs AVNBF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 779.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while AVNBF trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 124.91. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AVNBF's competition here
MTUAF vs MIESF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MIESF's competition here
MTUAF vs HERXF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HERXF's competition here
MTUAF vs EOPSF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 729.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while EOPSF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -29.08. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EOPSF's competition here
MTUAF vs MALJF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 641.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MALJF trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MALJF's competition here
MTUAF vs ASTGY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ASTGY's competition here
MTUAF vs AERG Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while AERG trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERG's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AERG's competition here
MTUAF vs JMCCF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while JMCCF trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check JMCCF's competition here
MTUAF vs FTGFF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while FTGFF trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FTGFF's competition here
MTUAF vs NORSF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 151.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while NORSF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NORSF's competition here
MTUAF vs BUKS Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BUKS trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BUKS's competition here
MTUAF vs SAFS Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAFS's competition here
MTUAF vs CNRD Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while CNRD trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 350.17. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CNRD's competition here
MTUAF vs ACCMF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ACCMF trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -47.30. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ACCMF's competition here
MTUAF vs TIPGF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check TIPGF's competition here
MTUAF vs VLTTF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of +24.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check VLTTF's competition here
MTUAF vs STTLF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check STTLF's competition here
MTUAF vs MAXQF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MAXQF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MAXQF's competition here
MTUAF vs NRPI Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while NRPI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NRPI's competition here
MTUAF vs QCKSF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check QCKSF's competition here
MTUAF vs OPST Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while OPST trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check OPST's competition here
MTUAF vs AKRRF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while AKRRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AKRRF's competition here
MTUAF vs TIKK Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while TIKK trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check TIKK's competition here
MTUAF vs ETCC Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ETCC trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ETCC's competition here
MTUAF vs FLYLF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FLYLF's competition here
MTUAF vs XERI Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check XERI's competition here
MTUAF vs USDR Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check USDR's competition here
MTUAF vs MSNVF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MSNVF's competition here
MTUAF vs SNAVF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SNAVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SNAVF's competition here
MTUAF vs NEXD Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while NEXD trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NEXD's competition here
MTUAF vs DEWY Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while DEWY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check DEWY's competition here
MTUAF vs HWKE Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while HWKE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HWKE's competition here
MTUAF vs LLLI Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while LLLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check LLLI's competition here
MTUAF vs PMEA Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check PMEA's competition here
MTUAF vs MDEX Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MDEX's competition here
MTUAF vs DLRWF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MTUAF has daily volatility of 4.15 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.Check DLRWF's competition here
MTUAF vs OBTEF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 177.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while OBTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check OBTEF's competition here
MTUAF vs RNWR Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RNWR's competition here
MTUAF vs CFFMF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CFFMF's competition here
MTUAF vs DSUS Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check DSUS's competition here
MTUAF vs PSSR Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 77.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while PSSR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check PSSR's competition here
MTUAF vs UITA Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check UITA's competition here
MTUAF vs ASAV Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ASAV's competition here
MTUAF vs LNGT Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check LNGT's competition here
MTUAF vs ADFS Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ADFS's competition here
MTUAF vs SDSS Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SDSS's competition here
MTUAF vs EPEO Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EPEO's competition here
MTUAF vs BANT Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BANT has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BANT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BANT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BANT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to BANT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BANT's competition here
MTUAF vs BRSI Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BRSI's competition here
MTUAF vs HSFI Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HSFI's competition here
MTUAF vs RDEGF Comparison August 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $456.15, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RDEGF's competition here