MTU Aero Engines AG
MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTUAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUAF | $425.15 | -2.15% | 22.4B | 22.89 | $18.21 | +0.53% |
| EADSF | $216.15 | -0.39% | 169.5B | 32.82 | $6.56 | +1.60% |
| EADSY | $53.05 | -1.19% | 167.2B | 32.18 | $1.65 | +1.60% |
| SAFRF | $325.73 | -0.04% | 137B | -176.73 | -$1.86 | +0.94% |
| SAFRY | $81.80 | +0.11% | 136.5B | -173.72 | -$0.47 | +0.99% |
| RYCEY | $13.31 | -1.41% | 112.3B | 33.25 | $0.40 | +0.57% |
| RYCEF | $13.20 | -0.33% | 111.5B | 32.20 | $0.41 | +0.61% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | +7.84% | 110.2B | 0.28 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RNMBF | $2,028.80 | -1.75% | 93B | 93.18 | $21.81 | +0.40% |
| RNMBY | $407.42 | -0.63% | 90.9B | 92.79 | $4.39 | +0.44% |
Stock Comparison
MTUAF vs EADSF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 169.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while EADSF trades at $216.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EADSF's competition here
MTUAF vs EADSY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while EADSY trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EADSY's competition here
MTUAF vs SAFRF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SAFRF trades at $325.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -176.73. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAFRF's competition here
MTUAF vs SAFRY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SAFRY trades at $81.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -173.72. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAFRY's competition here
MTUAF vs RYCEY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RYCEY trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RYCEY's competition here
MTUAF vs RYCEF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RYCEF trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RYCEF's competition here
MTUAF vs RLLCF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RLLCF's competition here
MTUAF vs RNMBF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RNMBF trades at $2,028.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 93.18. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RNMBF's competition here
MTUAF vs RNMBY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RNMBY trades at $407.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 92.79. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RNMBY's competition here
MTUAF vs BAESY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BAESY trades at $100.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BAESY's competition here
MTUAF vs BAESF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BAESF trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BAESF's competition here
MTUAF vs FINMY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while FINMY trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FINMY's competition here
MTUAF vs THLEF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while THLEF trades at $287.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 50.24. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check THLEF's competition here
MTUAF vs THLLY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while THLLY trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 47.36. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check THLLY's competition here
MTUAF vs FINMF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while FINMF trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FINMF's competition here
MTUAF vs SAABY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SAABY trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 55.69. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAABY's competition here
MTUAF vs SAABF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SAABF trades at $55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 55.22. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAABF's competition here
MTUAF vs DUAVF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while DUAVF trades at $306.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check DUAVF's competition here
MTUAF vs MTUAY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MTUAY trades at $211.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MTUAY's competition here
MTUAF vs SGGKY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SGGKY trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SGGKY's competition here
MTUAF vs SGGKF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SGGKF trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SGGKF's competition here
MTUAF vs HNSDF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while HNSDF trades at $118.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 128.58. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HNSDF's competition here
MTUAF vs HAGHY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while HAGHY trades at $57.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 123.86. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HAGHY's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRAF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BDRAF trades at $118.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRAF's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRBF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BDRBF trades at $118.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRBF's competition here
MTUAF vs BOMBF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BOMBF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BOMBF's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRXF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BDRXF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRXF's competition here
MTUAF vs BDRPF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BDRPF's competition here
MTUAF vs ACLLY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ACLLY trades at $88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 48.73. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ACLLY's competition here
MTUAF vs ACLIF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ACLIF trades at $86.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ACLIF's competition here
MTUAF vs YSHLF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while YSHLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check YSHLF's competition here
MTUAF vs NSKFF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while NSKFF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NSKFF's competition here
MTUAF vs FNCNF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while FNCNF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 86.52. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FNCNF's competition here
MTUAF vs SMBMF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SMBMF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SMBMF's competition here
MTUAF vs SMBMY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SMBMY trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 51.39. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SMBMY's competition here
MTUAF vs QNTQF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while QNTQF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check QNTQF's competition here
MTUAF vs MDALF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MDALF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 52.49. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MDALF's competition here
MTUAF vs QNTQY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while QNTQY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check QNTQY's competition here
MTUAF vs AVIJF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while AVIJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AVIJF's competition here
MTUAF vs LSIIF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while LSIIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check LSIIF's competition here
MTUAF vs CMGMY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while CMGMY trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CMGMY's competition here
MTUAF vs CMGMF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while CMGMF trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CMGMF's competition here
MTUAF vs AUTLF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while AUTLF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AUTLF's competition here
MTUAF vs GGRGF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check GGRGF's competition here
MTUAF vs CZGZF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while CZGZF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CZGZF's competition here
MTUAF vs ATROB Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ATROB trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -306.36. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ATROB's competition here
MTUAF vs SNIRF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SNIRF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SNIRF's competition here
MTUAF vs MIESY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MIESY's competition here
MTUAF vs AVNBF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 779.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while AVNBF trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 124.91. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AVNBF's competition here
MTUAF vs MIESF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MIESF's competition here
MTUAF vs HERXF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HERXF's competition here
MTUAF vs MALJF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 701.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MALJF trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MALJF's competition here
MTUAF vs ASTGY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ASTGY's competition here
MTUAF vs JMCCF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 481.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while JMCCF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check JMCCF's competition here
MTUAF vs AERG Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 475.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while AERG trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -54.50. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AERG's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AERG's competition here
MTUAF vs EOPSF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 439.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while EOPSF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -17.54. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EOPSF's competition here
MTUAF vs FTGFF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while FTGFF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FTGFF's competition here
MTUAF vs NORSF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while NORSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NORSF's competition here
MTUAF vs BUKS Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BUKS trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BUKS's competition here
MTUAF vs SAFS Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SAFS's competition here
MTUAF vs CNRD Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while CNRD trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 323.92. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CNRD's competition here
MTUAF vs ACCMF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ACCMF trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -54.61. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ACCMF's competition here
MTUAF vs TIPGF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check TIPGF's competition here
MTUAF vs VLTTF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -7.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check VLTTF's competition here
MTUAF vs STTLF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check STTLF's competition here
MTUAF vs NRPI Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while NRPI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NRPI's competition here
MTUAF vs MAXQF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MAXQF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MAXQF's competition here
MTUAF vs QCKSF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check QCKSF's competition here
MTUAF vs NEXD Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while NEXD trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -37.04. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check NEXD's competition here
MTUAF vs OBTEF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while OBTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check OBTEF's competition here
MTUAF vs OPST Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while OPST trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check OPST's competition here
MTUAF vs AKRRF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while AKRRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check AKRRF's competition here
MTUAF vs ETCC Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ETCC trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ETCC's competition here
MTUAF vs TIKK Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while TIKK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check TIKK's competition here
MTUAF vs FLYLF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check FLYLF's competition here
MTUAF vs XERI Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check XERI's competition here
MTUAF vs SNAVF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SNAVF's competition here
MTUAF vs USDR Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check USDR's competition here
MTUAF vs MSNVF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MSNVF's competition here
MTUAF vs DEWY Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while DEWY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check DEWY's competition here
MTUAF vs LLLI Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while LLLI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check LLLI's competition here
MTUAF vs HWKE Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while HWKE trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HWKE's competition here
MTUAF vs PMEA Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check PMEA's competition here
MTUAF vs MDEX Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check MDEX's competition here
MTUAF vs DLRWF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MTUAF has daily volatility of 0.51 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.Check DLRWF's competition here
MTUAF vs PSSR Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 154.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while PSSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check PSSR's competition here
MTUAF vs RNWR Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RNWR's competition here
MTUAF vs CFFMF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check CFFMF's competition here
MTUAF vs DSUS Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check DSUS's competition here
MTUAF vs UITA Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check UITA's competition here
MTUAF vs ASAV Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ASAV's competition here
MTUAF vs LNGT Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check LNGT's competition here
MTUAF vs ADFS Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check ADFS's competition here
MTUAF vs SDSS Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check SDSS's competition here
MTUAF vs EPEO Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EPEO's competition here
MTUAF vs BRSI Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check BRSI's competition here
MTUAF vs HSFI Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is less volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check HSFI's competition here
MTUAF vs RDEGF Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check RDEGF's competition here
MTUAF vs EKSN Comparison July 2025
MTUAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTUAF stands at 22.4B. In comparison, EKSN has a market cap of 600. Regarding current trading prices, MTUAF is priced at $425.15, while EKSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.89, whereas EKSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTUAF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EKSN's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MTUAF is more volatile compared to EKSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTUAF.Check EKSN's competition here