Mitsubishi Corporation

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while HTHIF trades at $30.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MSBHF trades at $19.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ITOCF trades at $53.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ITOCY trades at $103.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while HTHIY trades at $30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MITSF trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MITSY trades at $412.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CTPCF trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CTPCY trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MARUF trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MARUY trades at $201.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SSUMY trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SSUMF trades at $24.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while PITAF trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CKHUY trades at $6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CKHUF trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while HALMY trades at $88.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while HLMAF trades at $43.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while JMHLY trades at $55.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -34.34. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while JARLF trades at $55.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -34.22. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while GPOVF trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KPELY trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SWRAY trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KPELF trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KHOLY trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -153.57. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SWRBF trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while FCODF trades at $1,753.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 119.05. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MYTHY trades at $53.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while AYALY trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while FOSUY trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BJINF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while AKAAF trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BDVSY trades at $26.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BDVSF trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KTERF trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KINUF trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while FOSUF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SMGBF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while NARRF trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while GULRF trades at $8.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while GULRY trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MMSMY trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while TINLF trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while NICFF trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CHCLY trades at $32.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while TINLY trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ALGGY trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while GRGCF trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 831.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 779.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SHMWF trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while INDHF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while SBOX trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 369.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BEVFF trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while YMAIF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while THAFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ICBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while APTL trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while ECSL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while GTII trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while PRTT trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.

MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 79B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $19.85, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.