Mitsubishi Corporation
Mitsubishi Corporation MTSUY Peers
See (MTSUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSUY | $20.69 | -0.29% | 83B | 13.13 | $1.59 | +2.64% |
| HTHIF | $32.18 | +0.41% | 147.3B | 37.85 | $0.85 | +0.97% |
| MSBHF | $20.72 | -0.34% | 82.7B | 13.07 | $1.59 | +3.26% |
| ITOCY | $108.57 | +0.14% | 77B | 13.11 | $8.29 | N/A |
| ITOCF | $56.04 | +5.20% | 76.6B | 13.06 | $4.14 | +2.51% |
| HTHIY | $31.25 | +1.40% | 71.8B | 36.48 | $0.86 | +0.66% |
| MITSY | $434.20 | +0.27% | 62.2B | 10.49 | $41.30 | +2.20% |
| MITSF | $21.25 | -1.39% | 61.1B | 10.32 | $2.06 | +3.19% |
| CTPCF | $1.38 | +0.00% | 40.1B | 5.11 | $0.27 | +5.57% |
| CTPCY | $6.54 | +0.00% | 38.1B | 4.77 | $1.37 | +5.58% |
Stock Comparison
MTSUY vs HTHIF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while HTHIF trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 37.85. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MSBHF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MSBHF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ITOCY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ITOCY trades at $108.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ITOCF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ITOCF trades at $56.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs HTHIY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while HTHIY trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MITSY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MITSY trades at $434.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MITSF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MITSF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CTPCF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CTPCF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CTPCY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CTPCY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MARUF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MARUF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MARUY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MARUY trades at $210.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SSUMY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SSUMY trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SSUMF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SSUMF trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs PITAF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while PITAF trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CKHUF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CKHUF trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CKHUY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CKHUY trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs TYHOF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs HALMY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while HALMY trades at $89.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs HLMAF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while HLMAF trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs JMHLY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while JMHLY trades at $56.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -34.73. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs JARLF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -34.22. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs GPOVY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs GPOVF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while GPOVF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KPELY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KPELY trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SWRAY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SWRAY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SWRAF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KPELF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KHOLY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KHOLY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -153.21. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SWRBF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SWRBF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SCRPF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SEIBF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MYTHF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MYTHY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MYTHY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs FCODF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while FCODF trades at $1,721.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 116.90. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SKSUY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SCVPF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs HYUHF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs AYYLF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs AYALY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while AYALY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs FOSUY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while FOSUY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BJINF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs AKAAF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while AKAAF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs JGSHF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BDVSY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BDVSY trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SZHFF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KHEXF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BDVSF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BDVSF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ALFFF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KTERF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KINUF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs FOSUF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while FOSUF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KBDCY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SMGBF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SMGBF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs NARRF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs GULRF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KBDCF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BLJZY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs GULRY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs IWTNF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SWRBY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MMSMY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MMSMY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs TINLF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs NLTBF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs TINLY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while TINLY trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SGHIF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SGHIY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CHCLY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs NICFF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MPCFF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs XZJCF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ALGGY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ALGGY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BNHUF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs NSHBY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while NSHBY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs GRGCF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while GRGCF trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SHMWF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 779.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SHMWF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ALGGF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs MTLZF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs INDHF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs KKRAF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs SBOX Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CVVIF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BRYAF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BEVFF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 380.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BEVFF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CEEIF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs TJSCF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs HGRVF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs DMCHY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs YMAIF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while YMAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs THAFF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs JGSMY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ICBT Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs NOBGF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs APTL Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while APTL trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs RSDEF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs ECSL Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs GTII Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while GTII trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs BNIGF Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs PRTT Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while PRTT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.
MTSUY vs CIBY Comparison
MTSUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSUY stands at 83B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSUY is priced at $20.69, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSUY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, MTSUY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSUY is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSUY.