Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. (MTSFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTSFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSFF | $9.15 | +2.41% | 25.9B | 15.55 | $0.60 | +2.37% |
| MTSFY | $26.97 | -0.59% | 25B | 14.91 | $1.81 | +1.86% |
| MITEF | $19.00 | -6.86% | 23.7B | 18.63 | $1.02 | +1.60% |
| MITEY | $18.83 | +0.00% | 23.4B | 18.41 | $1.02 | +0.84% |
| HLDCY | $3.41 | -2.29% | 16.6B | 20.20 | $0.17 | +6.88% |
| HLDVF | $3.30 | -13.16% | 16B | 19.41 | $0.17 | +6.09% |
| SPHXF | $0.42 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 13.95 | $0.03 | +2.03% |
| BALDF | $7.40 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 13.45 | $0.55 | N/A |
| PSPSF | $171.20 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 17.83 | $9.60 | +2.66% |
| DIFTY | $25.96 | -0.54% | 6.9B | 10.83 | $2.40 | +2.72% |
Stock Comparison
MTSFF vs MTSFY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, MTSFY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while MTSFY trades at $26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas MTSFY's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTSFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to MTSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check MTSFY's competition here
MTSFF vs MITEF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, MITEF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while MITEF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas MITEF's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to MITEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check MITEF's competition here
MTSFF vs MITEY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, MITEY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while MITEY trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas MITEY's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to MITEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check MITEY's competition here
MTSFF vs HLDCY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HLDCY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HLDCY trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HLDCY's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLDCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to HLDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HLDCY's competition here
MTSFF vs HLDVF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HLDVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HLDVF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HLDVF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLDVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to HLDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HLDVF's competition here
MTSFF vs SPHXF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SPHXF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SPHXF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SPHXF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to SPHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SPHXF's competition here
MTSFF vs BALDF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, BALDF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while BALDF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas BALDF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BALDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to BALDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check BALDF's competition here
MTSFF vs PSPSF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, PSPSF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while PSPSF trades at $171.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas PSPSF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSPSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to PSPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check PSPSF's competition here
MTSFF vs DIFTY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, DIFTY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while DIFTY trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DIFTY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIFTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to DIFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check DIFTY's competition here
MTSFF vs CPNNF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, CPNNF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while CPNNF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CPNNF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPNNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to CPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check CPNNF's competition here
MTSFF vs DITTF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, DITTF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while DITTF trades at $97.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DITTF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DITTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to DITTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check DITTF's competition here
MTSFF vs TTUUF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, TTUUF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while TTUUF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TTUUF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTUUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to TTUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check TTUUF's competition here
MTSFF vs TKFOY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, TKFOY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while TKFOY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TKFOY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKFOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to TKFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check TKFOY's competition here
MTSFF vs VESTF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, VESTF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while VESTF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas VESTF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VESTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to VESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check VESTF's competition here
MTSFF vs AMLLF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, AMLLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while AMLLF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas AMLLF's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to AMLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check AMLLF's competition here
MTSFF vs FSRPF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, FSRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while FSRPF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FSRPF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to FSRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check FSRPF's competition here
MTSFF vs LLESF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, LLESF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while LLESF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas LLESF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LLESF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to LLESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check LLESF's competition here
MTSFF vs HNLGY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HNLGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HNLGY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HNLGY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HNLGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to HNLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HNLGY's competition here
MTSFF vs HUFAF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HUFAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HUFAF trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HUFAF's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUFAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to HUFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HUFAF's competition here
MTSFF vs LLESY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, LLESY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while LLESY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas LLESY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LLESY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to LLESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check LLESY's competition here
MTSFF vs UILCF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, UILCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while UILCF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas UILCF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UILCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to UILCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check UILCF's competition here
MTSFF vs UILCY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, UILCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while UILCY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas UILCY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UILCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to UILCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check UILCY's competition here
MTSFF vs HNLGF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HNLGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HNLGF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HNLGF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HNLGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to HNLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HNLGF's competition here
MTSFF vs NDVLY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, NDVLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while NDVLY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas NDVLY's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDVLY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to NDVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check NDVLY's competition here
MTSFF vs NWWDF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, NWWDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while NWWDF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas NWWDF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWWDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to NWWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check NWWDF's competition here
MTSFF vs LCOMF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, LCOMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while LCOMF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas LCOMF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LCOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to LCOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check LCOMF's competition here
MTSFF vs GEAHF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, GEAHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while GEAHF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas GEAHF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEAHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to GEAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check GEAHF's competition here
MTSFF vs COYJF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, COYJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while COYJF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas COYJF's P/E ratio is 200.53. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COYJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to COYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check COYJF's competition here
MTSFF vs IRICF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, IRICF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while IRICF trades at $206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas IRICF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRICF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to IRICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check IRICF's competition here
MTSFF vs MRCBF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, MRCBF has a market cap of 891.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while MRCBF trades at $83.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas MRCBF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRCBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to MRCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check MRCBF's competition here
MTSFF vs GZTGF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, GZTGF has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while GZTGF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas GZTGF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GZTGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to GZTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check GZTGF's competition here
MTSFF vs NNXXY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, NNXXY has a market cap of 575.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while NNXXY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas NNXXY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NNXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to NNXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check NNXXY's competition here
MTSFF vs GDVTZ Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, GDVTZ has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while GDVTZ trades at $385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas GDVTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDVTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to GDVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check GDVTZ's competition here
MTSFF vs SHTGF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SHTGF has a market cap of 249.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SHTGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SHTGF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHTGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SHTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SHTGF's competition here
MTSFF vs SIOLF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SIOLF has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SIOLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SIOLF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIOLF's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to SIOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SIOLF's competition here
MTSFF vs SNLKF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SNLKF has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SNLKF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SNLKF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNLKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SNLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SNLKF's competition here
MTSFF vs DDCCF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, DDCCF has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while DDCCF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DDCCF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDCCF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to DDCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check DDCCF's competition here
MTSFF vs SYYNY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SYYNY has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SYYNY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SYYNY's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYYNY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to SYYNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SYYNY's competition here
MTSFF vs MNPP Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, MNPP has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while MNPP trades at $1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas MNPP's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to MNPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check MNPP's competition here
MTSFF vs SIOLY Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SIOLY has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SIOLY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SIOLY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIOLY's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SIOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SIOLY's competition here
MTSFF vs PTPKF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, PTPKF has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while PTPKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas PTPKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to PTPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check PTPKF's competition here
MTSFF vs LVSDF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, LVSDF has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while LVSDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas LVSDF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LVSDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LVSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check LVSDF's competition here
MTSFF vs LSIHF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, LSIHF has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while LSIHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas LSIHF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSIHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check LSIHF's competition here
MTSFF vs HGPI Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HGPI has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HGPI trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HGPI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to HGPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HGPI's competition here
MTSFF vs FCCTP Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, FCCTP has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while FCCTP trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FCCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCCTP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to FCCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check FCCTP's competition here
MTSFF vs ECDP Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, ECDP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while ECDP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ECDP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to ECDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check ECDP's competition here
MTSFF vs TRRE Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, TRRE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while TRRE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to TRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check TRRE's competition here
MTSFF vs SNNHF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SNNHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SNNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SNNHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to SNNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SNNHF's competition here
MTSFF vs HOOB Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, HOOB has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while HOOB trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HOOB's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOOB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to HOOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check HOOB's competition here
MTSFF vs CRDV Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, CRDV has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while CRDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CRDV's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRDV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to CRDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check CRDV's competition here
MTSFF vs TDRK Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, TDRK has a market cap of 528.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while TDRK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TDRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to TDRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check TDRK's competition here
MTSFF vs NIHK Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, NIHK has a market cap of 419.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while NIHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas NIHK's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIHK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to NIHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check NIHK's competition here
MTSFF vs IDVV Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, IDVV has a market cap of 410.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while IDVV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas IDVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDVV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to IDVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check IDVV's competition here
MTSFF vs PCLI Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, PCLI has a market cap of 309.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while PCLI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas PCLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to PCLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check PCLI's competition here
MTSFF vs FTPM Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, FTPM has a market cap of 247.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while FTPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FTPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTPM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to FTPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check FTPM's competition here
MTSFF vs BRER Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, BRER has a market cap of 164.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while BRER trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas BRER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRER's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to BRER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check BRER's competition here
MTSFF vs YRIV Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, YRIV has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while YRIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas YRIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to YRIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check YRIV's competition here
MTSFF vs SHIOF Comparison August 2025
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.9B. In comparison, SHIOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.15, while SHIOF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SHIOF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is more volatile compared to SHIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.Check SHIOF's competition here