Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. MTSFF Peers
See (MTSFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSFF | $9.20 | -4.27% | 25.5B | 14.84 | $0.62 | +2.31% |
| MTSFY | $28.46 | +1.18% | 26.3B | 15.30 | $1.86 | +1.77% |
| MITEY | $18.56 | +0.81% | 23.3B | 17.68 | $1.05 | +0.45% |
| MITEF | $18.48 | -0.19% | 23B | 17.60 | $1.05 | +0.01% |
| HLDVF | $3.15 | +6.42% | 15.3B | 18.53 | $0.17 | +7.35% |
| HLDCY | $3.09 | -2.32% | 15B | 18.18 | $0.17 | +7.47% |
| SPHXF | $0.46 | -20.29% | 13.3B | 15.33 | $0.03 | +1.87% |
| BALDF | $6.73 | N/A | 8B | 12.70 | $0.53 | N/A |
| PSPSF | $173.75 | N/A | 8B | 18.52 | $9.38 | +2.62% |
| DITTF | $113.57 | -6.06% | 7.5B | 11.46 | $9.91 | +4.25% |
Stock Comparison
MTSFF vs MTSFY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MTSFY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while MTSFY trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas MTSFY's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTSFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to MTSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs MITEY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MITEY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while MITEY trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas MITEY's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to MITEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs MITEF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MITEF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while MITEF trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas MITEF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and MITEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs HLDVF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HLDVF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HLDVF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HLDVF's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLDVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and HLDVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs HLDCY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HLDCY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HLDCY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HLDCY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLDCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to HLDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs SPHXF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SPHXF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SPHXF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SPHXF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SPHXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs BALDF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BALDF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while BALDF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas BALDF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to BALDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs PSPSF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PSPSF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while PSPSF trades at $173.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas PSPSF's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSPSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to PSPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs DITTF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DITTF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while DITTF trades at $113.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas DITTF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DITTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and DITTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs CPNNF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CPNNF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while CPNNF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas CPNNF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPNNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and CPNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs DIFTY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DIFTY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while DIFTY trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas DIFTY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIFTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to DIFTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs TTUUF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TTUUF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while TTUUF trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas TTUUF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTUUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to TTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs TKFOY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TKFOY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while TKFOY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas TKFOY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKFOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to TKFOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs VESTF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VESTF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while VESTF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas VESTF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VESTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and VESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs AMLLF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AMLLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while AMLLF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas AMLLF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to AMLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs FSRPF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FSRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while FSRPF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas FSRPF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to FSRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs LLESF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LLESF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while LLESF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas LLESF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLESF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LLESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs LLESY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LLESY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while LLESY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas LLESY's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLESY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LLESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs HUFAF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HUFAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HUFAF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HUFAF's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUFAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and HUFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs UILCF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, UILCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while UILCF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas UILCF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UILCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to UILCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs HNLGY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HNLGY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HNLGY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HNLGY's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNLGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and HNLGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs UILCY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, UILCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while UILCY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas UILCY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UILCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to UILCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs HNLGF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HNLGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HNLGF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HNLGF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNLGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to HNLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs NWWDF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NWWDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while NWWDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas NWWDF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWWDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to NWWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs NDVLY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NDVLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while NDVLY trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas NDVLY's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDVLY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to NDVLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs GEAHF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GEAHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while GEAHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas GEAHF's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEAHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to GEAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs LCOMF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LCOMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while LCOMF trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas LCOMF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LCOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs COYJF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, COYJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while COYJF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas COYJF's P/E ratio is 200.53. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COYJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and COYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs IRICF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IRICF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while IRICF trades at $206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas IRICF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRICF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and IRICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs MRCBF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MRCBF has a market cap of 898.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while MRCBF trades at $83.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas MRCBF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRCBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and MRCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs GZTGF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GZTGF has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while GZTGF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas GZTGF's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GZTGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to GZTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs NNXXY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NNXXY has a market cap of 574.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while NNXXY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas NNXXY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to NNXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs GDVTZ Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GDVTZ has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while GDVTZ trades at $500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas GDVTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDVTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and GDVTZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs SIOLF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SIOLF has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SIOLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SIOLF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIOLF's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and SIOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs SHTGF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SHTGF has a market cap of 234.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SHTGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SHTGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHTGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SHTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs SYYNY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SYYNY has a market cap of 200.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SYYNY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SYYNY's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYYNY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SYYNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs SNLKF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SNLKF has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SNLKF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SNLKF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNLKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SNLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs DDCCF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DDCCF has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while DDCCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas DDCCF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDCCF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and DDCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs MNPP Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MNPP has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while MNPP trades at $1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas MNPP's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and MNPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs SIOLY Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SIOLY has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SIOLY trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SIOLY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIOLY's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to SIOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs PTPKF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PTPKF has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while PTPKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas PTPKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to PTPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs LVSDF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LVSDF has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while LVSDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas LVSDF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVSDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LVSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs LSIHF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LSIHF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while LSIHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas LSIHF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSIHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to LSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs HGPI Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HGPI has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HGPI trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HGPI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to HGPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs ECDP Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ECDP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while ECDP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas ECDP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to ECDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs HOOB Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HOOB has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while HOOB trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas HOOB's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOOB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to HOOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs TRRE Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TRRE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while TRRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas TRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and TRRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs SNNHF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SNNHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SNNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SNNHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and SNNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs IDVV Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IDVV has a market cap of 958.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while IDVV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas IDVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDVV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to IDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs TDRK Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TDRK has a market cap of 604.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while TDRK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas TDRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to TDRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs NIHK Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NIHK has a market cap of 455.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while NIHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas NIHK's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIHK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and NIHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs PCLI Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PCLI has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while PCLI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas PCLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to PCLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs FTPM Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FTPM has a market cap of 247.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while FTPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas FTPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTPM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to FTPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs BRER Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BRER has a market cap of 164.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while BRER trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas BRER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRER's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to BRER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs CRDV Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRDV has a market cap of 34.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while CRDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas CRDV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRDV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF is less volatile compared to CRDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTSFF.
MTSFF vs YRIV Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YRIV has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while YRIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas YRIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and YRIV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs SHIOF Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SHIOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while SHIOF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas SHIOF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and SHIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MTSFF vs FCCTP Comparison
MTSFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTSFF stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FCCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTSFF is priced at $9.20, while FCCTP trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.84, whereas FCCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTSFF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCCTP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTSFF and FCCTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).