Mitie Group plc
Mitie Group plc MTO.L Peers
See (MTO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTO.L | £136.20 | -1.73% | 1.7B | 17.02 | £0.08 | +3.16% |
| 0HYJ.L | £228.29 | +0.36% | 92.2B | 20.21 | £11.29 | +0.68% |
| 0II3.L | £267.84 | -0.21% | 33.3B | 43.34 | £6.18 | +0.62% |
| 0QMI.L | £2,301.00 | +0.65% | 16.4B | 28.13 | £81.79 | +3.76% |
| 0HHB.L | £39.95 | -0.13% | 10.5B | 70.33 | £0.57 | +1.02% |
| RTO.L | £350.60 | +0.14% | 8.8B | 29.22 | £0.12 | +2.59% |
| ITRK.L | £4,742.00 | -0.21% | 7.6B | 22.26 | £2.13 | +3.30% |
| 0KX9.L | £43.63 | -0.73% | 4.5B | 7.39 | £5.90 | +5.08% |
| 0QQE.L | £65.20 | +0.62% | 4.2B | 18.95 | £3.44 | +3.60% |
| 0KGY.L | £220.75 | +0.57% | 4.1B | 19.18 | £11.51 | +2.67% |
Stock Comparison
MTO.L vs 0HYJ.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HYJ.L has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0HYJ.L trades at £228.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0HYJ.L's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0HYJ.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0HYJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0II3.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0II3.L has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0II3.L trades at £267.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0II3.L's P/E ratio is 43.34. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0II3.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0II3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0QMI.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QMI.L has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0QMI.L trades at £2,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0QMI.L's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0QMI.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0QMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0HHB.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HHB.L has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0HHB.L trades at £39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0HHB.L's P/E ratio is 70.33. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0HHB.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0HHB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs RTO.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RTO.L has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while RTO.L trades at £350.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas RTO.L's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTO.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to RTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs ITRK.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITRK.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while ITRK.L trades at £4,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas ITRK.L's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITRK.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to ITRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0KX9.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KX9.L has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0KX9.L trades at £43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0KX9.L's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0KX9.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0KX9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0QQE.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QQE.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0QQE.L trades at £65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0QQE.L's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0QQE.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0QQE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0KGY.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KGY.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0KGY.L trades at £220.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0KGY.L's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0KGY.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0KGY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs IWG.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IWG.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while IWG.L trades at £208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas IWG.L's P/E ratio is 208.00. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IWG.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to IWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs SRP.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SRP.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while SRP.L trades at £192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas SRP.L's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to SRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0DZJ.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0DZJ.L has a market cap of 781.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0DZJ.L trades at £71.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0DZJ.L's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0DZJ.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0DZJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0HDQ.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HDQ.L has a market cap of 779.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0HDQ.L trades at £33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0HDQ.L's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0HDQ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0HDQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0IX0.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IX0.L has a market cap of 758M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0IX0.L trades at £25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0IX0.L's P/E ratio is 50.69. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0IX0.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0IX0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs JSG.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JSG.L has a market cap of 588.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while JSG.L trades at £143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas JSG.L's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JSG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to JSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs HYVE.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HYVE.L has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while HYVE.L trades at £120.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas HYVE.L's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HYVE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to HYVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs DWF.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DWF.L has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while DWF.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas DWF.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DWF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to DWF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs RST.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RST.L has a market cap of 337.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while RST.L trades at £249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas RST.L's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RST.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to RST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs RWS.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RWS.L has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while RWS.L trades at £81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas RWS.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to RWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs FRAN.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FRAN.L has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while FRAN.L trades at £155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas FRAN.L's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FRAN.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to FRAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs CPI.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPI.L has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while CPI.L trades at £245.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas CPI.L's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPI.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to CPI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs DLAR.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DLAR.L has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while DLAR.L trades at £129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas DLAR.L's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLAR.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to DLAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0QME.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QME.L has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0QME.L trades at £98.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0QME.L's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0QME.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0QME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs KEYS.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KEYS.L has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while KEYS.L trades at £610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas KEYS.L's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KEYS.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to KEYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0RQI.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RQI.L has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0RQI.L trades at £3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0RQI.L's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0RQI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0RQI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs PPHC.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PPHC.L has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while PPHC.L trades at £137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas PPHC.L's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PPHC.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to PPHC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs BEG.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BEG.L has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while BEG.L trades at £104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas BEG.L's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BEG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to BEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs KGH.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KGH.L has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while KGH.L trades at £158.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas KGH.L's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KGH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to KGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0RNP.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RNP.L has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0RNP.L trades at £14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0RNP.L's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0RNP.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to 0RNP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs INSE.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INSE.L has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while INSE.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas INSE.L's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INSE.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to INSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs SFT.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SFT.L has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while SFT.L trades at £29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas SFT.L's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SFT.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to SFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs WATR.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WATR.L has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while WATR.L trades at £370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas WATR.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WATR.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to WATR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs GRA.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRA.L has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while GRA.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas GRA.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRA.L's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to GRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs CTG.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CTG.L has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while CTG.L trades at £160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas CTG.L's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to CTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs VNET.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VNET.L has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while VNET.L trades at £74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas VNET.L's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VNET.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to VNET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs INCE.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INCE.L has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while INCE.L trades at £5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas INCE.L's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INCE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to INCE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs MIND.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MIND.L has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while MIND.L trades at £17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas MIND.L's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIND.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to MIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs DSW.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DSW.L has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while DSW.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas DSW.L's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DSW.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to DSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs REAT.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, REAT.L has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while REAT.L trades at £59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas REAT.L's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to REAT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to REAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs CPP.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPP.L has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while CPP.L trades at £81.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas CPP.L's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPP.L's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to CPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs CEPS.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CEPS.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while CEPS.L trades at £23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas CEPS.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CEPS.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to CEPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs RBGP.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBGP.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while RBGP.L trades at £0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas RBGP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RBGP.L's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to RBGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs GYG.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GYG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while GYG.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas GYG.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GYG.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is less volatile compared to GYG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs HSV.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSV.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while HSV.L trades at £1,198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas HSV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSV.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MTO.L has daily volatility of 3.36 and HSV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
MTO.L vs TUNG.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TUNG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while TUNG.L trades at £54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas TUNG.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TUNG.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to TUNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.
MTO.L vs 0Q82.L Comparison
MTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTO.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0Q82.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTO.L is priced at £136.20, while 0Q82.L trades at £18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.02, whereas 0Q82.L's P/E ratio is 95.34. In terms of profitability, MTO.L's ROE is +0.28%, compared to 0Q82.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTO.L is more volatile compared to 0Q82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTO.L.