Metals Exploration plc
Metals Exploration plc MTL.L Peers
See (MTL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTL.L | $7.60 | -0.65% | 195.47M | 1.52 | $0.05 | N/A |
| PLZL.IL | $19,650.50 | +4.07% | 25.68T | 3429.41 | $5.73 | N/A |
| 0R4M.L | $379.01 | -4.62% | 91.13B | 565.68 | $0.67 | +0.23% |
| 0QYZ.L | $221.75 | +2.19% | 42.71B | 44.18 | $5.02 | +0.62% |
| 0R28.L | $52.11 | N/A | 42.31B | 39.39 | $1.32 | +2.02% |
| WPM.L | $5,860.00 | +1.74% | 26.59B | 56.89 | $1.03 | +0.83% |
| EDV.L | $2,088.00 | +0.58% | 5.04B | -65.25 | -$0.32 | +2.71% |
| AUY.L | $475.00 | +1.06% | 4.57B | -5.72 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| CEY.L | $146.00 | N/A | 1.72B | 24.33 | $0.06 | +1.97% |
| GGP.L | $12.18 | -0.16% | 1.64B | -12.18 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTL.L vs PLZL.IL Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, PLZL.IL has a market cap of 25.68T. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while PLZL.IL trades at $19,650.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas PLZL.IL's P/E ratio is 3429.41. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to PLZL.IL's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to PLZL.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0R4M.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0R4M.L has a market cap of 91.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0R4M.L trades at $379.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0R4M.L's P/E ratio is 565.68. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0R4M.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to 0R4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0QYZ.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0QYZ.L has a market cap of 42.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0QYZ.L trades at $221.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0QYZ.L's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0QYZ.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to 0QYZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0R28.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0R28.L has a market cap of 42.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0R28.L trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0R28.L's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0R28.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to 0R28.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs WPM.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, WPM.L has a market cap of 26.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while WPM.L trades at $5,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas WPM.L's P/E ratio is 56.89. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to WPM.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to WPM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs EDV.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, EDV.L has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while EDV.L trades at $2,088.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas EDV.L's P/E ratio is -65.25. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to EDV.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to EDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs AUY.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, AUY.L has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while AUY.L trades at $475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas AUY.L's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to AUY.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to AUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CEY.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CEY.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CEY.L trades at $146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CEY.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CEY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to CEY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs GGP.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, GGP.L has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while GGP.L trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas GGP.L's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to GGP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to GGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs HOC.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, HOC.L has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while HOC.L trades at $273.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas HOC.L's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to HOC.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to HOC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs PAF.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, PAF.L has a market cap of 852.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while PAF.L trades at $46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas PAF.L's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to PAF.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to PAF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs RSG.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, RSG.L has a market cap of 574.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while RSG.L trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas RSG.L's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to RSG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to RSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs AMRQ.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, AMRQ.L has a market cap of 300.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while AMRQ.L trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas AMRQ.L's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to AMRQ.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to AMRQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CMCL.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CMCL.L has a market cap of 209.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CMCL.L trades at $1,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CMCL.L's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CMCL.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to CMCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs THX.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, THX.L has a market cap of 201.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while THX.L trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas THX.L's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to THX.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to THX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs AAZ.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, AAZ.L has a market cap of 142.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while AAZ.L trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas AAZ.L's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to AAZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to AAZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs SRB.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, SRB.L has a market cap of 133.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while SRB.L trades at $143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas SRB.L's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to SRB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to SRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs ALTN.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, ALTN.L has a market cap of 91.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while ALTN.L trades at $334.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas ALTN.L's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to ALTN.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to ALTN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CNR.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CNR.L has a market cap of 65.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CNR.L trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CNR.L's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CNR.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to CNR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs KEFI.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, KEFI.L has a market cap of 50.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while KEFI.L trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas KEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to KEFI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to KEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs HUM.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, HUM.L has a market cap of 45.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while HUM.L trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas HUM.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to HUM.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to HUM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs PAT.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, PAT.L has a market cap of 43.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while PAT.L trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas PAT.L's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to PAT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to PAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CORA.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CORA.L has a market cap of 40.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CORA.L trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CORA.L's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CORA.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to CORA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs OMI.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, OMI.L has a market cap of 32.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while OMI.L trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas OMI.L's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to OMI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to OMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs AAU.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, AAU.L has a market cap of 23.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while AAU.L trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas AAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to AAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to AAU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0UH8.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0UH8.L has a market cap of 15.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0UH8.L trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0UH8.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0UH8.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to 0UH8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs LEX.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, LEX.L has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while LEX.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas LEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to LEX.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to LEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs GDP.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, GDP.L has a market cap of 11.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while GDP.L trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas GDP.L's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to GDP.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to GDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0VLY.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0VLY.L has a market cap of 11.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0VLY.L trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0VLY.L's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0VLY.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to 0VLY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs SGZ.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, SGZ.L has a market cap of 10.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while SGZ.L trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas SGZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to SGZ.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to SGZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs ORR.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, ORR.L has a market cap of 8.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while ORR.L trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas ORR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to ORR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to ORR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs GRL.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, GRL.L has a market cap of 8.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while GRL.L trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas GRL.L's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to GRL.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to GRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs XTR.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, XTR.L has a market cap of 7.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while XTR.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas XTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to XTR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to XTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs GCAT.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, GCAT.L has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while GCAT.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas GCAT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to GCAT.L's ROE of +5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to GCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs ECR.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, ECR.L has a market cap of 5.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while ECR.L trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas ECR.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to ECR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to ECR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CNG.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CNG.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CNG.L trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CNG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CNG.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to CNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs GAL.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, GAL.L has a market cap of 4.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while GAL.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas GAL.L's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to GAL.L's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to GAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0V2Y.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0V2Y.L has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0V2Y.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0V2Y.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0V2Y.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to 0V2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs WSBN.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, WSBN.L has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while WSBN.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas WSBN.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to WSBN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to WSBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs PALM.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, PALM.L has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while PALM.L trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas PALM.L's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to PALM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to PALM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CGNR.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CGNR.L has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CGNR.L trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CGNR.L's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CGNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to CGNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs 0V9B.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, 0V9B.L has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while 0V9B.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas 0V9B.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to 0V9B.L's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to 0V9B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs CGH.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, CGH.L has a market cap of 1.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while CGH.L trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas CGH.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to CGH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to CGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs KAT.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, KAT.L has a market cap of 947504.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while KAT.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas KAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to KAT.L's ROE of +11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is less volatile compared to KAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.
MTL.L vs HAMA.L Comparison
MTL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTL.L stands at 195.47M. In comparison, HAMA.L has a market cap of 385111.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTL.L is priced at $7.60, while HAMA.L trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.52, whereas HAMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, MTL.L's ROE is +0.87%, compared to HAMA.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTL.L is more volatile compared to HAMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTL.L.