WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund MTGP Peers
See (MTGP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTGP | $43.14 | -0.72% | 60.2M | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| VBTLX | $9.57 | -0.21% | 354.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.80% |
| VBTIX | $9.57 | -0.21% | 354.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.80% |
| VBMPX | $9.57 | -0.21% | 353.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.80% |
| VBMFX | $9.57 | -0.21% | 352B | N/A | N/A | +3.68% |
| BND | $72.21 | -0.54% | 350.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.80% |
| VTBNX | $9.44 | -0.21% | 305.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.87% |
| VTIFX | $29.52 | -0.20% | 104.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.31% |
| BNDX | $49.20 | +0.04% | 104B | N/A | N/A | +4.31% |
| VTABX | $19.67 | -0.20% | 103.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.28% |
Stock Comparison
MTGP vs VBTLX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBTLX has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBTLX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBTLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBTIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBTIX has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBTIX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBTIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBMPX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBMPX has a market cap of 353.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBMPX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBMFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBMFX has a market cap of 352B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBMFX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBMFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BND Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BND has a market cap of 350.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BND trades at $72.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to BND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VTBNX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VTBNX has a market cap of 305.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VTBNX trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTBNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTBNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VTBNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VTIFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VTIFX has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VTIFX trades at $29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VTIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BNDX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BNDX has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BNDX trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VTABX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VTABX has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VTABX trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTABX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTABX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VTABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BFAFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BFAFX has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BFAFX trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBIRX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBIRX has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBIRX trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FXNAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FXNAX has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FXNAX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FXNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VCIT Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VCIT has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VCIT trades at $81.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VCIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VICSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VICSX has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VICSX trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VICSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VICSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BAGIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BAGIX has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BAGIX trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BAGSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BAGSX has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BAGSX trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs WOBDX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, WOBDX has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while WOBDX trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOBDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOBDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to WOBDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs JCBZX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, JCBZX has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while JCBZX trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCBZX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to JCBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs TLT Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, TLT has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while TLT trades at $85.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLT's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to TLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBILX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBILX has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBILX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBILX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBILX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBILX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs SGOV Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, SGOV has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while SGOV trades at $100.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGOV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to SGOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BIV Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BIV has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BIV trades at $75.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to BIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VSCSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VSCSX has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VSCSX trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VSCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VCSH Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VCSH has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VCSH trades at $78.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VCSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FTBFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FTBFX has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FTBFX trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FTBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VTEAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VTEAX has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VTEAX trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTEAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTEAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VTEAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BCOSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BCOSX has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BCOSX trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCOSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BCOSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BCOIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BCOIX has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BCOIX trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BCOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IEF Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IEF has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IEF trades at $93.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEF's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs MWTRX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, MWTRX has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while MWTRX trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to MWTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs MWTIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, MWTIX has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while MWTIX trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to MWTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IUSB Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IUSB has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IUSB trades at $45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSB's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IUSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs MWTSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, MWTSX has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while MWTSX trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to MWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs LQD Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, LQD has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while LQD trades at $106.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQD's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to LQD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs DBLTX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, DBLTX has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while DBLTX trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to DBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs DLTNX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, DLTNX has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while DLTNX trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to DLTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs GIBCX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, GIBCX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while GIBCX trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to GIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs PTRQX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, PTRQX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while PTRQX trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRQX's P/E ratio is 60.14. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTRQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to PTRQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs GIBIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, GIBIX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while GIBIX trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to GIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs GIBRX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, GIBRX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while GIBRX trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to GIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs GIBLX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, GIBLX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while GIBLX trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to GIBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs GIBAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, GIBAX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while GIBAX trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to GIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs PDBZX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, PDBZX has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while PDBZX trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDBZX's P/E ratio is 60.14. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to PDBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs JBFRX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, JBFRX has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while JBFRX trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBFRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to JBFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs JHBIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, JHBIX has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while JHBIX trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to JHBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs JHNBX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, JHNBX has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while JHNBX trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHNBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHNBX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to JHNBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IBFFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IBFFX has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IBFFX trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs AFTFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, AFTFX has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while AFTFX trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to AFTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs USHY Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, USHY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while USHY trades at $36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USHY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to USHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs NHMCX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, NHMCX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while NHMCX trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to NHMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs LBNVX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, LBNVX has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while LBNVX trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to LBNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IGSB Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IGSB has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IGSB trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IGSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs SHV Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, SHV has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while SHV trades at $110.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to SHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs ANBEX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, ANBEX has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while ANBEX trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANBEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANBEX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to ANBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FBND Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FBND has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FBND trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBND's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FBND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs HYG Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, HYG has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while HYG trades at $79.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYG's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to HYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs PFORX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, PFORX has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while PFORX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to PFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs PFOAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, PFOAX has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while PFOAX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to PFOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs PFBPX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, PFBPX has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while PFBPX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFBPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFBPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to PFBPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FTRBX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FTRBX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FTRBX trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTRBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FTRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VCOBX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VCOBX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VCOBX trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCOBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCOBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VCOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VUBFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VUBFX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VUBFX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUBFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VUBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs NHMAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, NHMAX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while NHMAX trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAX's P/E ratio is 50.41. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to NHMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VCORX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VCORX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VCORX trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCORX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VCORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs NHMRX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, NHMRX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while NHMRX trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMRX's P/E ratio is 50.41. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to NHMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs NHCCX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, NHCCX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while NHCCX trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHCCX's P/E ratio is 50.41. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to NHCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs USIG Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, USIG has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while USIG trades at $50.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to USIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BFIFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BFIFX has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BFIFX trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFIFX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs NHMFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, NHMFX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while NHMFX trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMFX's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to NHMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VCLT Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VCLT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VCLT trades at $73.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to VCLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs LUBAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, LUBAX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while LUBAX trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUBAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to LUBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBLTX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBLTX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBLTX trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VLTCX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VLTCX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VLTCX trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLTCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VLTCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BIMSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BIMSX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BIMSX trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BIMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BSBIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BSBIX has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BSBIX trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BSBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BSBSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BSBSX has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BSBSX trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FBNDX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FBNDX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FBNDX trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FBNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs TLH Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, TLH has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while TLH trades at $98.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to TLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FIKQX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FIKQX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FIKQX trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIKQX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIKQX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FIKQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs RCWAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, RCWAX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while RCWAX trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCWAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to RCWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FIPDX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FIPDX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FIPDX trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIPDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FIPDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs WBFFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, WBFFX has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while WBFFX trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to WBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs STYAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, STYAX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while STYAX trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to STYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs WIPIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, WIPIX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while WIPIX trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIPIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIPIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to WIPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs SUB Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, SUB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while SUB trades at $105.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to SUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IIBZX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IIBZX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IIBZX trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IIBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IIBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IIBAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IIBAX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IIBAX trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs IICIX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, IICIX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while IICIX trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IICIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IICIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to IICIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs PTIAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, PTIAX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while PTIAX trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to PTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs SPIB Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, SPIB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while SPIB trades at $33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to SPIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FLOT Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FLOT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FLOT trades at $50.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FLOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BUBSX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BUBSX has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BUBSX trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to BUBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs VBLAX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, VBLAX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while VBLAX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to VBLAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs BLV Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, BLV has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while BLV trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to BLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs SPAB Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, SPAB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while SPAB trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to SPAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs TRBFX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, TRBFX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while TRBFX trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to TRBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs SCHZ Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, SCHZ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while SCHZ trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is less volatile compared to SCHZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs FUTBX Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, FUTBX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while FUTBX trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to FUTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.
MTGP vs JNK Comparison
MTGP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTGP stands at 60.2M. In comparison, JNK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTGP is priced at $43.14, while JNK trades at $95.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTGP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNK's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, MTGP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTGP is more volatile compared to JNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTGP.