Mothercare plc
Mothercare plc MTC.L Peers
See (MTC.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTC.L | $2.74 | +20.18% | 15.42M | 2.74 | $0.01 | N/A |
| 0R1O.IL | $213.30 | +3.14% | 2.10T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0JVQ.L | $230.86 | -0.75% | 129.21B | 18.75 | $12.31 | +1.99% |
| 0K0E.L | $2,539.83 | +2.43% | 128.76B | 695.65 | $3.65 | N/A |
| 0KAB.L | $1,322.90 | -0.42% | 75.72B | 42.34 | $31.25 | N/A |
| 0HJL.L | $3,660.54 | +0.54% | 61.24B | 32.31 | $113.30 | N/A |
| 0KXO.L | $149.25 | +1.21% | 47.35B | 33.16 | $4.50 | +1.01% |
| 0LD8.L | $98.96 | -1.57% | 44.96B | 8.17 | $12.11 | +4.49% |
| 0R3D.L | $69.70 | +2.05% | 32.13B | 17.68 | $3.94 | +1.59% |
| 0LXC.L | $174.27 | +0.22% | 21.43B | 11.32 | $15.39 | +1.35% |
Stock Comparison
MTC.L vs 0R1O.IL Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 2.10T. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0R1O.IL trades at $213.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0JVQ.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 129.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0JVQ.L trades at $230.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0K0E.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 128.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0K0E.L trades at $2,539.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 695.65. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0KAB.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 75.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0KAB.L trades at $1,322.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0HJL.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 61.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0HJL.L trades at $3,660.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0KXO.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 47.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0KXO.L trades at $149.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0LD8.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 44.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0LD8.L trades at $98.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0R3D.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 32.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0R3D.L trades at $69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0LXC.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 21.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0LXC.L trades at $174.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IC7.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IC7.L has a market cap of 19.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IC7.L trades at $87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IC7.L's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IC7.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IC8.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 18.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IC8.L trades at $87.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0LIB.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 17.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0LIB.L trades at $413.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IUX.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 16.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IUX.L trades at $122.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0R18.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 15.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0R18.L trades at $74.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0HTQ.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 10.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0HTQ.L trades at $69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0QVE.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0QVE.L trades at $600.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 134.92. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0QVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0JSC.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0JSC.L trades at $33.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0RCW.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0RCW.L trades at $157.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IPD.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IPD.L trades at $101.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IIW.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IIW.L trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0SOM.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0SOM.L trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs JD.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while JD.L trades at $89.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0KTF.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0KTF.L trades at $229.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0R32.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0R32.L has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0R32.L trades at $80.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0R32.L's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R32.L's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0R32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs DFIB.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, DFIB.L has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while DFIB.L trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas DFIB.L's P/E ratio is -50.94. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFIB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to DFIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs FRAS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while FRAS.L trades at $697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs ROO.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while ROO.L trades at $174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs JET.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while JET.L trades at $1,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs DNLM.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while DNLM.L trades at $1,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0H9G.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0H9G.L trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0QK3.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0QK3.L trades at $35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0HSU.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0HSU.L trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs CURY.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while CURY.L trades at $121.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs SMWH.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while SMWH.L trades at $1,012.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 253.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IQK.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IQK.L trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs PETS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while PETS.L trades at $251.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs MOON.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 796.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while MOON.L trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -39.83. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0JRL.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 792.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0JRL.L trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs AO.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 540.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while AO.L trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs THG.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 379.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while THG.L trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs BOO.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, BOO.L has a market cap of 364.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while BOO.L trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas BOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOO.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to BOO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs ASC.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 357.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while ASC.L trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs HFD.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 356.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while HFD.L trades at $163.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0RA5.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0RA5.L trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0RA5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs CARD.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 327.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while CARD.L trades at $93.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs DEBS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 317.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while DEBS.L trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0KDU.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 298.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0KDU.L trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0ROF.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0ROF.L trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs BWNG.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while BWNG.L trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0OQX.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 124.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0OQX.L trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0OQX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs SCS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, SCS.L has a market cap of 95.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while SCS.L trades at $270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas SCS.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to SCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0RP3.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 81.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0RP3.L trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0RP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs IGR.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 61.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while IGR.L trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs MRK.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 61.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while MRK.L trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs PROC.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 41.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while PROC.L trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to PROC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs ANG.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 30.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while ANG.L trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs G4M.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 28.95M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while G4M.L trades at $138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs HRN.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while HRN.L trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs SOS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, SOS.L has a market cap of 19.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while SOS.L trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas SOS.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to SOS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs WRKS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 16.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while WRKS.L trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs PODP.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 9.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while PODP.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to PODP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs MMAG.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while MMAG.L trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to MMAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs SCHO.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while SCHO.L trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0DQK.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0DQK.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0DQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs DISP.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while DISP.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to DISP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs UBG.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488670.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while UBG.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to UBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs ITS.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406875.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while ITS.L trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to ITS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.
MTC.L vs 0IJU.L Comparison
MTC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTC.L stands at 15.42M. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTC.L is priced at $2.74, while 0IJU.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.74, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MTC.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTC.L is more volatile compared to 0IJU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTC.L.