Moatable, Inc.
Moatable, Inc. MTBLY Peers
See (MTBLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTBLY | $1.05 | -13.93% | 415.8K | -8.08 | -$0.13 | +57.69% |
| SAPGF | $310.54 | +0.92% | 362.3B | 56.15 | $5.53 | +0.85% |
| NEMKY | $31.97 | +55.95% | 92.3B | 91.34 | $0.35 | +0.39% |
| CNSWF | $3,567.96 | -0.40% | 75.6B | 101.62 | $35.11 | +0.11% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.1B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTF | $37.19 | +1.56% | 48.8B | 37.19 | $1.00 | +0.67% |
| DASTY | $36.81 | -0.92% | 48.4B | 35.74 | $1.03 | +0.71% |
| WIGBY | $70.89 | N/A | 23.5B | 118.15 | $0.60 | +0.18% |
| WTCHF | $70.45 | -0.26% | 23.4B | 117.41 | $0.60 | +0.15% |
| DIDIY | $4.99 | +1.84% | 23.2B | 124.75 | $0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTBLY vs SAPGF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 362.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SAPGF trades at $310.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 56.15. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NEMKY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NEMKY trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 91.34. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs CNSWF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while CNSWF trades at $3,567.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 101.62. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs INVUP Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs DASTF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while DASTF trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs DASTY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while DASTY trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs WIGBY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while WIGBY trades at $70.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 118.15. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs WTCHF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while WTCHF trades at $70.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 117.41. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs DIDIY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while DIDIY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 124.75. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs XROLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while XROLF trades at $122.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 142.06. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SGGEF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SGGEF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SGPYY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SGPYY trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NEMTF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 71.44. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs OBIIF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs OCLCF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NCSYF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NCSYF trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ALMFF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs THNOF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs KGDEY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while KGDEY trades at $159.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -285.29. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs HOILF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TMSNY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TMSNY trades at $76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs FNOXF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TMNSF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs LIFX Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while LIFX trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 473.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SRBEF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SRBEF trades at $282.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -99.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SMCYY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs KXSCF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while KXSCF trades at $144.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 426.27. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SICRF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ASOZF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ASOZF trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ASOZY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TMVWF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs UBMRF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TMVWY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TMVWY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs KHOTF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs QTGPF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while QTGPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ESKEF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs FREKF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while FREKF trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs IPEU Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs WEMXF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TMOAY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TMOAY trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -57.40. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SWONF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SWONF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -921.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs MAGTF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs KNNNF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while KNNNF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs VOBIF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ZEUCF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs LTTHF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs GBGPF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 967M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs EGHSF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 962.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while EGHSF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ESIGF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BHPA Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BTRCF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BTRCF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SLVFF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BVSFF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TTMZF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 656.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TMOAF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BCTCF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NPACF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs PXPHF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NXLLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NXLLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NPACY Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs RWWI Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 493.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while RWWI trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BLKLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 484.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BLKLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -82.14. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NSWEF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BRDLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TCYSF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 441.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TCYSF trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 212.51. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs CMDXF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 419.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while CMDXF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs IQGLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs CHNVF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs RPGHF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs PSSWF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs LCHTF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs JAPPF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs GBUX Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 341.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while GBUX trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -72.28. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs PLDIF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while PLDIF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ELMFF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs BAINF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while BAINF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs RLLMF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while RLLMF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 206.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs DOTDF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs IVUFF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs ABXXF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while ABXXF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs LOQPF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while LOQPF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SMTEF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SMTEF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs EXMXF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs MCAP Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while MCAP trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs DAHLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs FXSRF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs FBSFF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs WONDF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs SYZLF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while SYZLF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -166.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs IARGF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs EXSPF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs CBSZF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs TCIIF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs DFORF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while DFORF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs WECMF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs NEOJF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs PSHPF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs RTME Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.
MTBLY vs VCTTF Comparison
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 415.8K. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.05, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.