Moatable, Inc.
Moatable, Inc. (MTBLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTBLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTBLY | $1.40 | -4.11% | 554.5K | -10.77 | -$0.13 | +43.26% |
| SAPGF | $290.30 | +1.36% | 337.5B | 45.01 | $6.44 | +0.91% |
| CNSWF | $3,430.81 | -0.71% | 73B | 98.50 | $34.95 | +0.11% |
| INVUP | $26.01 | +0.23% | 48.3B | -1734.00 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTY | $32.06 | +0.03% | 42.3B | 32.78 | $0.98 | +0.92% |
| DASTF | $31.72 | -7.22% | 41.9B | 32.37 | $0.98 | +0.88% |
| DIDIY | $5.38 | +3.86% | 24.9B | 66.88 | $0.08 | N/A |
| WIGBY | $74.88 | +0.15% | 24.8B | 124.79 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
| WTCHF | $73.00 | +0.00% | 24.4B | 119.67 | $0.61 | +0.18% |
| XROLF | $109.98 | -4.29% | 18.2B | 127.88 | $0.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTBLY vs SAPGF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 337.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SAPGF trades at $290.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 45.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SAPGF's competition here
MTBLY vs CNSWF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while CNSWF trades at $3,430.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 98.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check CNSWF's competition here
MTBLY vs INVUP Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while INVUP trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1734.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check INVUP's competition here
MTBLY vs DASTY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while DASTY trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 32.78. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check DASTY's competition here
MTBLY vs DASTF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while DASTF trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check DASTF's competition here
MTBLY vs DIDIY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while DIDIY trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check DIDIY's competition here
MTBLY vs WIGBY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while WIGBY trades at $74.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 124.79. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check WIGBY's competition here
MTBLY vs WTCHF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while WTCHF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 119.67. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check WTCHF's competition here
MTBLY vs XROLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while XROLF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 127.88. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check XROLF's competition here
MTBLY vs NEMKY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NEMKY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 78.89. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NEMKY's competition here
MTBLY vs NEMTF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NEMTF trades at $143.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NEMTF's competition here
MTBLY vs SGGEF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SGGEF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SGGEF's competition here
MTBLY vs SGPYY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SGPYY trades at $63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SGPYY's competition here
MTBLY vs OBIIF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while OBIIF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check OBIIF's competition here
MTBLY vs OCLCF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while OCLCF trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check OCLCF's competition here
MTBLY vs NCSYF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NCSYF trades at $157.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NCSYF's competition here
MTBLY vs KGDEY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while KGDEY trades at $239.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -428.16. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check KGDEY's competition here
MTBLY vs TMSNY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TMSNY trades at $90.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TMSNY's competition here
MTBLY vs ALMFF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ALMFF's competition here
MTBLY vs TMNSF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TMNSF trades at $91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TMNSF's competition here
MTBLY vs LIFX Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while LIFX trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 567.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check LIFX's competition here
MTBLY vs FNOXF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check FNOXF's competition here
MTBLY vs HOILF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check HOILF's competition here
MTBLY vs THNOF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check THNOF's competition here
MTBLY vs ASOZF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ASOZF's competition here
MTBLY vs SMCYY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SMCYY's competition here
MTBLY vs SRBEF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SRBEF trades at $250.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -125.19. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SRBEF's competition here
MTBLY vs KXSCF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while KXSCF trades at $141.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 414.86. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check KXSCF's competition here
MTBLY vs SICRF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SICRF's competition here
MTBLY vs ASOZY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ASOZY's competition here
MTBLY vs UBMRF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check UBMRF's competition here
MTBLY vs KHOTF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check KHOTF's competition here
MTBLY vs SWONF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SWONF trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -815.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SWONF's competition here
MTBLY vs IDXAF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, IDXAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while IDXAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas IDXAF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IDXAF's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IDXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check IDXAF's competition here
MTBLY vs ESKEF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ESKEF's competition here
MTBLY vs FREKF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while FREKF trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -23.16. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check FREKF's competition here
MTBLY vs TMVWY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TMVWY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TMVWY's competition here
MTBLY vs TMVWF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TMVWF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TMVWF's competition here
MTBLY vs IPEU Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check IPEU's competition here
MTBLY vs TMOAY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TMOAY trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TMOAY's competition here
MTBLY vs WEMXF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check WEMXF's competition here
MTBLY vs BCTCF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BCTCF's competition here
MTBLY vs MAGTF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check MAGTF's competition here
MTBLY vs QTGPF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while QTGPF trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check QTGPF's competition here
MTBLY vs MVVYF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, MVVYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while MVVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas MVVYF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MVVYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to MVVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check MVVYF's competition here
MTBLY vs VOBIF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check VOBIF's competition here
MTBLY vs KNNNF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while KNNNF trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check KNNNF's competition here
MTBLY vs ZEUCF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ZEUCF's competition here
MTBLY vs LTTHF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check LTTHF's competition here
MTBLY vs GBGPF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 953.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check GBGPF's competition here
MTBLY vs ESIGF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ESIGF's competition here
MTBLY vs EGHSF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 913.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while EGHSF trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check EGHSF's competition here
MTBLY vs BHPA Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BHPA's competition here
MTBLY vs BTRCF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BTRCF's competition here
MTBLY vs NPACY Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 763M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NPACY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NPACY's competition here
MTBLY vs TMOAF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TMOAF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TMOAF's competition here
MTBLY vs SLVFF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SLVFF's competition here
MTBLY vs TTMZF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TTMZF's competition here
MTBLY vs XMMRF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check XMMRF's competition here
MTBLY vs NPACF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NPACF's competition here
MTBLY vs PXPHF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check PXPHF's competition here
MTBLY vs NXLLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NXLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NXLLF's competition here
MTBLY vs RWWI Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check RWWI's competition here
MTBLY vs NSWEF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NSWEF's competition here
MTBLY vs CMDXF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 465.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while CMDXF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check CMDXF's competition here
MTBLY vs BRDLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BRDLF's competition here
MTBLY vs BVSFF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BVSFF's competition here
MTBLY vs TCYSF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 423.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TCYSF trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 129.82. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TCYSF's competition here
MTBLY vs IQGLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check IQGLF's competition here
MTBLY vs CHNVF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check CHNVF's competition here
MTBLY vs LCHTF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while LCHTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check LCHTF's competition here
MTBLY vs BLKLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 384.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BLKLF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -76.03. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BLKLF's competition here
MTBLY vs RPGHF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check RPGHF's competition here
MTBLY vs PSSWF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check PSSWF's competition here
MTBLY vs RTME Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check RTME's competition here
MTBLY vs ABXXF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 355.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ABXXF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ABXXF's competition here
MTBLY vs ELMFF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check ELMFF's competition here
MTBLY vs JAPPF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check JAPPF's competition here
MTBLY vs DOTDF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while DOTDF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check DOTDF's competition here
MTBLY vs PLDIF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while PLDIF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check PLDIF's competition here
MTBLY vs RLLMF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while RLLMF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -67.17. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check RLLMF's competition here
MTBLY vs IVUFF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check IVUFF's competition here
MTBLY vs CIGMF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check CIGMF's competition here
MTBLY vs EXMXF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check EXMXF's competition here
MTBLY vs LOQPF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check LOQPF's competition here
MTBLY vs BAINF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 261.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while BAINF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 113.50. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check BAINF's competition here
MTBLY vs SMTEF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SMTEF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SMTEF's competition here
MTBLY vs MCAP Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while MCAP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check MCAP's competition here
MTBLY vs DAHLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check DAHLF's competition here
MTBLY vs FXSRF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check FXSRF's competition here
MTBLY vs FBSFF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check FBSFF's competition here
MTBLY vs EXSPF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while EXSPF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check EXSPF's competition here
MTBLY vs WONDF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check WONDF's competition here
MTBLY vs NEOJF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check NEOJF's competition here
MTBLY vs CBSZF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check CBSZF's competition here
MTBLY vs FHGDF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, FHGDF has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while FHGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas FHGDF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FHGDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to FHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check FHGDF's competition here
MTBLY vs SYZLF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while SYZLF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -159.75. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check SYZLF's competition here
MTBLY vs TCIIF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check TCIIF's competition here
MTBLY vs IARGF Comparison August 2025
MTBLY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBLY stands at 554.5K. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTBLY is priced at $1.40, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -10.77, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, MTBLY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBLY is less volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBLY.Check IARGF's competition here