MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Euro Government Bond 3-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF
MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Euro Government Bond 3-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF (MTB.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTB.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTB.PA | €151.72 | +0.17% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IEAU.AS | €5.96 | +0.22% | 14.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AGUG.AS | €4.51 | +0.22% | 11.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.06% |
| AGGE.AS | €4.09 | +0.28% | 3.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.38% |
| JBEM.PA | €9.50 | +0.33% | 3.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SUOU.AS | €4.32 | +0.30% | 2.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.41% |
| DHYD.AS | €4.64 | +0.16% | 2.2B | 10.93 | €0.42 | +6.86% |
| MTA.PA | €127.02 | +0.12% | 2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ICOV.AS | €142.37 | +0.07% | 1.8B | N/A | N/A | +1.90% |
| SLXU.AS | €5.63 | -0.07% | 1.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTB.PA vs IEAU.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IEAU.AS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while IEAU.AS trades at €5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to IEAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check IEAU.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs AGUG.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGUG.AS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while AGUG.AS trades at €4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to AGUG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check AGUG.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs AGGE.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGGE.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while AGGE.AS trades at €4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to AGGE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check AGGE.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs JBEM.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JBEM.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while JBEM.PA trades at €9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBEM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to JBEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check JBEM.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs SUOU.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUOU.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while SUOU.AS trades at €4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to SUOU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check SUOU.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs DHYD.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DHYD.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while DHYD.AS trades at €4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHYD.AS's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to DHYD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check DHYD.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs MTA.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTA.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while MTA.PA trades at €127.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTA.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to MTA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check MTA.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs ICOV.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ICOV.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while ICOV.AS trades at €142.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICOV.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICOV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to ICOV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check ICOV.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs SLXU.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLXU.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while SLXU.AS trades at €5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLXU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to SLXU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check SLXU.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs CYBU.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CYBU.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while CYBU.AS trades at €5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to CYBU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check CYBU.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs CYBE.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CYBE.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while CYBE.AS trades at €6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to CYBE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check CYBE.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs MTD.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTD.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while MTD.PA trades at €169.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to MTD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check MTD.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs X1G.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, X1G.PA has a market cap of 980.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while X1G.PA trades at €232.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X1G.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to X1G.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to X1G.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check X1G.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs C53D.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, C53D.PA has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while C53D.PA trades at €152.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C53D.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C53D.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to C53D.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check C53D.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs CLIM.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CLIM.PA has a market cap of 444.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while CLIM.PA trades at €48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLIM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to CLIM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check CLIM.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs IGEM.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IGEM.AS has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while IGEM.AS trades at €4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGEM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGEM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to IGEM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check IGEM.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs IGAE.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IGAE.AS has a market cap of 385.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while IGAE.AS trades at €4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to IGAE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check IGAE.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs MTF.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTF.PA has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while MTF.PA trades at €178.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTF.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTF.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to MTF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check MTF.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs MA13.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MA13.PA has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while MA13.PA trades at €100.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA13.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MA13.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to MA13.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check MA13.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs ASIG.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASIG.AS has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while ASIG.AS trades at €5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to ASIG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check ASIG.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs C53.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, C53.PA has a market cap of 214.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while C53.PA trades at €215.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C53.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C53.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to C53.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check C53.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs AGEB.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGEB.PA has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while AGEB.PA trades at €144.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGEB.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGEB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to AGEB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check AGEB.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs X13G.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, X13G.PA has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while X13G.PA trades at €118.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X13G.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to X13G.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to X13G.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check X13G.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs HAGG.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HAGG.PA has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while HAGG.PA trades at €9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAGG.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAGG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to HAGG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check HAGG.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs UEDD.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UEDD.AS has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while UEDD.AS trades at €5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEDD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEDD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to UEDD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check UEDD.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs PLAN.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLAN.PA has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while PLAN.PA trades at €9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLAN.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to PLAN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check PLAN.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs CGBI.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CGBI.AS has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while CGBI.AS trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBI.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGBI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to CGBI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check CGBI.AS's competition here
MTB.PA vs UIFL.PA Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UIFL.PA has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while UIFL.PA trades at €60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFL.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFL.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to UIFL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check UIFL.PA's competition here
MTB.PA vs CGGD.AS Comparison August 2025
MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CGGD.AS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at €151.72, while CGGD.AS trades at €3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to CGGD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.Check CGGD.AS's competition here