MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Euro Government Bond 3-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, JBEM.PA has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while JBEM.PA trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBEM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to JBEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, MTA.PA has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while MTA.PA trades at $126.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTA.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to MTA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, ICOV.AS has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while ICOV.AS trades at $143.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICOV.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICOV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to ICOV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, MTD.PA has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while MTD.PA trades at $168.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to MTD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, X1G.PA has a market cap of 911.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while X1G.PA trades at $231.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X1G.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to X1G.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to X1G.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, IEAU.AS has a market cap of 702.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while IEAU.AS trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA and IEAU.AS have similar daily volatility (0.26).

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, CYBU.AS has a market cap of 689.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while CYBU.AS trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to CYBU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, C53D.PA has a market cap of 442.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while C53D.PA trades at $151.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C53D.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C53D.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to C53D.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, DHYD.AS has a market cap of 411.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while DHYD.AS trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHYD.AS's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHYD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to DHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, SUOU.AS has a market cap of 409.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while SUOU.AS trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to SUOU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, IGAE.AS has a market cap of 377.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while IGAE.AS trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to IGAE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, IGEM.AS has a market cap of 376.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while IGEM.AS trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGEM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGEM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to IGEM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, CLIM.PA has a market cap of 313.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while CLIM.PA trades at $48.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLIM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to CLIM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, AGUG.AS has a market cap of 301.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while AGUG.AS trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to AGUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, MTF.PA has a market cap of 285.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while MTF.PA trades at $180.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTF.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTF.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to MTF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, MA13.PA has a market cap of 278.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while MA13.PA trades at $100.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA13.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MA13.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to MA13.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, C53.PA has a market cap of 214.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while C53.PA trades at $215.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C53.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C53.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to C53.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, CYBE.AS has a market cap of 184.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while CYBE.AS trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to CYBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, ASIG.AS has a market cap of 150.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while ASIG.AS trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to ASIG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, AGEB.PA has a market cap of 120.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while AGEB.PA trades at $138.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGEB.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGEB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to AGEB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, HAGG.PA has a market cap of 76.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while HAGG.PA trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAGG.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAGG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to HAGG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, X13G.PA has a market cap of 63.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while X13G.PA trades at $117.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X13G.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to X13G.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to X13G.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, AGGE.AS has a market cap of 41.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while AGGE.AS trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to AGGE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, PLAN.PA has a market cap of 27.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while PLAN.PA trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLAN.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to PLAN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, UEDD.AS has a market cap of 19.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while UEDD.AS trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEDD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEDD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to UEDD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, CGBI.AS has a market cap of 14.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while CGBI.AS trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBI.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGBI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to CGBI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, UIFL.PA has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while UIFL.PA trades at $60.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFL.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFL.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is less volatile compared to UIFL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, SLXU.AS has a market cap of 5.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while SLXU.AS trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLXU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to SLXU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.

MTB.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MTB.PA stands at 1.55B. In comparison, CGGD.AS has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MTB.PA is priced at $151.54, while CGGD.AS trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MTB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTB.PA is more volatile compared to CGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB.PA.