MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Euro Government Bond 1-3Y (DR) UCITS ETF
MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Euro Government Bond 1-3Y (DR) UCITS ETF MTA.PA Peers
See (MTA.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTA.PA | €126.87 | +0.02% | 2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JBEM.PA | €9.50 | -0.02% | 3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTB.PA | €151.57 | +0.07% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ICOV.AS | €143.46 | -0.04% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.69% |
| MTD.PA | €169.11 | +0.05% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| X1G.PA | €231.98 | +0.10% | 951.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CYBU.AS | €5.77 | -0.12% | 774.9M | N/A | N/A | +1.99% |
| IEAU.AS | €5.94 | +0.08% | 544.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| C53D.PA | €151.90 | +0.11% | 538.5M | N/A | N/A | +1.44% |
| CLIM.PA | €48.63 | -0.12% | 441.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTA.PA vs JBEM.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, JBEM.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while JBEM.PA trades at €9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBEM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to JBEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs MTB.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MTB.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while MTB.PA trades at €151.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTB.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to MTB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs ICOV.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ICOV.AS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while ICOV.AS trades at €143.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICOV.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICOV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to ICOV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs MTD.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MTD.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while MTD.PA trades at €169.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to MTD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs X1G.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, X1G.PA has a market cap of 951.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while X1G.PA trades at €231.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X1G.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to X1G.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to X1G.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs CYBU.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CYBU.AS has a market cap of 774.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while CYBU.AS trades at €5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to CYBU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs IEAU.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, IEAU.AS has a market cap of 544.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while IEAU.AS trades at €5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to IEAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs C53D.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, C53D.PA has a market cap of 538.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while C53D.PA trades at €151.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C53D.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C53D.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to C53D.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs CLIM.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CLIM.PA has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while CLIM.PA trades at €48.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLIM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to CLIM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs DHYD.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, DHYD.AS has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while DHYD.AS trades at €4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHYD.AS's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHYD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to DHYD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs SUOU.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, SUOU.AS has a market cap of 396.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while SUOU.AS trades at €4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to SUOU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs IGEM.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, IGEM.AS has a market cap of 384.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while IGEM.AS trades at €4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGEM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGEM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to IGEM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs IGAE.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, IGAE.AS has a market cap of 384.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while IGAE.AS trades at €4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to IGAE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs MTF.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MTF.PA has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while MTF.PA trades at €179.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTF.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTF.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to MTF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs AGUG.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, AGUG.AS has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while AGUG.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to AGUG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs MA13.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, MA13.PA has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while MA13.PA trades at €100.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA13.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MA13.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to MA13.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs CYBE.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CYBE.AS has a market cap of 219.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while CYBE.AS trades at €6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to CYBE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs C53.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, C53.PA has a market cap of 214.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while C53.PA trades at €215.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C53.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C53.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to C53.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs ASIG.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, ASIG.AS has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while ASIG.AS trades at €5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to ASIG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs AGEB.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, AGEB.PA has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while AGEB.PA trades at €143.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGEB.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGEB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to AGEB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs HAGG.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, HAGG.PA has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while HAGG.PA trades at €9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAGG.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAGG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to HAGG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs X13G.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, X13G.PA has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while X13G.PA trades at €118.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X13G.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to X13G.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to X13G.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs AGGE.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, AGGE.AS has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while AGGE.AS trades at €4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to AGGE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs UEDD.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, UEDD.AS has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while UEDD.AS trades at €5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEDD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEDD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to UEDD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs PLAN.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, PLAN.PA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while PLAN.PA trades at €9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLAN.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to PLAN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs CGBI.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CGBI.AS has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while CGBI.AS trades at €5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBI.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGBI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is more volatile compared to CGBI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs UIFL.PA Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, UIFL.PA has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while UIFL.PA trades at €60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFL.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFL.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to UIFL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs CGGD.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, CGGD.AS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while CGGD.AS trades at €4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to CGGD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.
MTA.PA vs SLXU.AS Comparison
MTA.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTA.PA stands at 2B. In comparison, SLXU.AS has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTA.PA is priced at €126.87, while SLXU.AS trades at €5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTA.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLXU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTA.PA is less volatile compared to SLXU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTA.PA.