Growens S.p.A.
Growens S.p.A. MSPAF Peers
See (MSPAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSPAF | $5.92 | N/A | 0 | 197.33 | $0.03 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $296.17 | -0.47% | 345.5B | 53.36 | $5.55 | +0.89% |
| NEMKY | $26.00 | +26.83% | 75.1B | 74.29 | $0.35 | +0.46% |
| CNSWF | $3,520.00 | -0.28% | 74.6B | 100.72 | $34.95 | +0.11% |
| OBIIF | $127.00 | +336.43% | 55.9B | 123.30 | $1.03 | +0.18% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.1B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTY | $37.70 | -0.20% | 49.5B | 37.32 | $1.01 | +0.69% |
| DASTF | $37.31 | -4.46% | 49B | 36.94 | $1.01 | +0.67% |
| WTCHF | $68.16 | -0.96% | 22.6B | 111.74 | $0.61 | +0.15% |
| WIGBY | $64.01 | -9.71% | 21.2B | 106.68 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
MSPAF vs SAPGF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 345.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SAPGF trades at $296.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs NEMKY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NEMKY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 74.29. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NEMKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs CNSWF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while CNSWF trades at $3,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 100.72. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs OBIIF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while OBIIF trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 123.30. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and OBIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs INVUP Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and INVUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs DASTY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while DASTY trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs DASTF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while DASTF trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and DASTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs WTCHF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while WTCHF trades at $68.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 111.74. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and WTCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs WIGBY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while WIGBY trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 106.68. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs DIDIY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while DIDIY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 121.50. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs XROLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while XROLF trades at $117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 135.17. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and XROLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs SGGEF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SGGEF trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and SGGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs SGPYY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SGPYY trades at $65.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs OCLCF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while OCLCF trades at $117.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and OCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs NEMTF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NEMTF trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 71.61. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NEMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs LQAVF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, LQAVF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while LQAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas LQAVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to LQAVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to LQAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs NCSYF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NCSYF trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NCSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs ALMFF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs KGDEY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while KGDEY trades at $171.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -305.68. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs THNOF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs TMNSF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMNSF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and TMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs HOILF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and HOILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs TMSNY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMSNY trades at $72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs LIFX Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while LIFX trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 491.25. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs FNOXF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while FNOXF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs SMCYY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs SICRF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs KXSCF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while KXSCF trades at $141.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 416.09. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs SRBEF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SRBEF trades at $213.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -75.07. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and SRBEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs ASOZY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ASOZY trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and ASOZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs TMIX Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMIX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMIX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMIX's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMIX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to TMIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs ZEUCF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ZEUCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and ZEUCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs ASOZF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs ISDSF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ISDSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ISDSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ISDSF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ISDSF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to ISDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs QTGPF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while QTGPF trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and QTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs WEMXF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while WEMXF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs TMVWF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMVWF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs UBMRF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs TMVWY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMVWY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and TMVWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs KHOTF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs ESKEF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs FREKF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while FREKF trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.57. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and FREKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs TMOAY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMOAY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and TMOAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs MAGTF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs KNNNF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and KNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs IPEU Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while IPEU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs SWONF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs GBGPF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while GBGPF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 113.75. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and GBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs VOBIF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and VOBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs EGHSF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while EGHSF trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs LTTHF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs ESIGF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs BTRCF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 797M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BTRCF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs SLVFF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs BVSFF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and BVSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs TTMZF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs TMOAF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and TMOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs NPACY Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NPACY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NPACY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs RWWI Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs PSSWF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while PSSWF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and PSSWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs NXLLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NXLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs NSWEF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs BLKLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 472.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BLKLF trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -80.14. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and BLKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs CHNVF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and CHNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs TCYSF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while TCYSF trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 206.20. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and TCYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs BRDLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs NPACF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NPACF trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs IQGLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs BHPA Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BHPA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs CMDXF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 398.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while CMDXF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs RPGHF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs LCHTF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while LCHTF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and LCHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs PLDIF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while PLDIF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and PLDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs JAPPF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and JAPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs ELMFF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs BCTCF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BCTCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and BCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs RLLMF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while RLLMF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and RLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs PXPHF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while PXPHF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs DOTDF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs PTRRF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while PTRRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs IVUFF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs CIGMF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs ABXXF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while ABXXF trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs LOQPF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while LOQPF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and LOQPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs EXMXF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs MCAP Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while MCAP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and MCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs GBUX Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while GBUX trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs BAINF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while BAINF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and BAINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs DAHLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs LUPGF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, LUPGF has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while LUPGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas LUPGF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to LUPGF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to LUPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs SMTEF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SMTEF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and SMTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs FXSRF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs NEOJF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while NEOJF trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and NEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs FBSFF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while FBSFF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and FBSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs WONDF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.
MSPAF vs SYZLF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while SYZLF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -168.25. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and SYZLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs IARGF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and IARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs EXSPF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MSPAF vs CBSZF Comparison
MSPAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSPAF stands at 0. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSPAF is priced at $5.92, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSPAF currently has a P/E ratio of 197.33, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, MSPAF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSPAF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSPAF.