MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. (MSADF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MSADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSADF | $22.89 | +0.00% | 34.6B | 7.68 | $2.98 | +4.34% |
| TKOMF | $43.46 | +0.00% | 83.6B | 11.97 | $3.63 | +2.66% |
| TKOMY | $41.68 | +0.95% | 79.1B | 11.18 | $3.68 | +1.70% |
| SMPNY | $15.32 | +1.47% | 56.1B | 18.06 | $0.84 | N/A |
| PINXY | $13.80 | +3.29% | 48.2B | 5.33 | $2.54 | +3.71% |
| PPCCY | $51.95 | +0.10% | 46.7B | 10.43 | $5.04 | +3.24% |
| PINXF | $0.76 | +0.00% | 46.6B | 5.84 | $0.13 | +1.44% |
| PPCCF | $1.99 | -1.00% | 44.7B | 10.05 | $0.20 | +3.76% |
| FRFFF | $18.32 | +0.52% | 42.3B | 0.18 | $99.31 | +4.94% |
| FAXXF | $17.80 | +0.00% | 42.1B | 0.18 | $99.31 | +6.49% |
Stock Comparison
MSADF vs TKOMF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while TKOMF trades at $43.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to TKOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check TKOMF's competition here
MSADF vs TKOMY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while TKOMY trades at $41.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check TKOMY's competition here
MSADF vs SMPNY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SMPNY has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while SMPNY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas SMPNY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMPNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to SMPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check SMPNY's competition here
MSADF vs PINXY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while PINXY trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to PINXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check PINXY's competition here
MSADF vs PPCCY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while PPCCY trades at $51.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check PPCCY's competition here
MSADF vs PINXF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while PINXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check PINXF's competition here
MSADF vs PPCCF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while PPCCF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to PPCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check PPCCF's competition here
MSADF vs FRFFF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FRFFF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FRFFF's competition here
MSADF vs FAXXF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FAXXF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FAXXF's competition here
MSADF vs FRFHF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FRFHF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FRFHF trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FRFHF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FRFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FRFHF's competition here
MSADF vs IFCZF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while IFCZF trades at $209.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check IFCZF's competition here
MSADF vs INFFF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while INFFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to INFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check INFFF's competition here
MSADF vs IFTPF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to IFTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check IFTPF's competition here
MSADF vs MSADY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while MSADY trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check MSADY's competition here
MSADF vs FRFXF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FRFXF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FRFXF's competition here
MSADF vs NHOLF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while NHOLF trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check NHOLF's competition here
MSADF vs QBIEY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while QBIEY trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check QBIEY's competition here
MSADF vs QBEIF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while QBEIF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to QBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check QBEIF's competition here
MSADF vs FRFGF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to FRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FRFGF's competition here
MSADF vs FXFLF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FXFLF's competition here
MSADF vs PWZYF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while PWZYF trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check PWZYF's competition here
MSADF vs SNMCY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while SNMCY trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check SNMCY's competition here
MSADF vs AMIGF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AMIGF trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AMIGF's competition here
MSADF vs AMIGY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AMIGY trades at $46.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AMIGY's competition here
MSADF vs IAUGY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while IAUGY trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to IAUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check IAUGY's competition here
MSADF vs IAUGF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while IAUGF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check IAUGF's competition here
MSADF vs SNMYF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while SNMYF trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check SNMYF's competition here
MSADF vs PZAKY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while PZAKY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check PZAKY's competition here
MSADF vs BZLYF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while BZLYF trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check BZLYF's competition here
MSADF vs DIISY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while DIISY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIISY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check DIISY's competition here
MSADF vs HCXLF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while HCXLF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to HCXLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check HCXLF's competition here
MSADF vs HCXLY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while HCXLY trades at $31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to HCXLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check HCXLY's competition here
MSADF vs IFZZF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to IFZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check IFZZF's competition here
MSADF vs QUCOF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while QUCOF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to QUCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check QUCOF's competition here
MSADF vs ZZHGY Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while ZZHGY trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to ZZHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check ZZHGY's competition here
MSADF vs AFSIM Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFSIM trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFSIM's competition here
MSADF vs AFSIC Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFSIC trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFSIC's competition here
MSADF vs AFSIP Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFSIP trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFSIP's competition here
MSADF vs AFSIB Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFSIB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFSIB trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFSIB's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFSIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to AFSIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFSIB's competition here
MSADF vs AFSIN Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFSIN trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFSIN's competition here
MSADF vs AFSIA Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFSIA trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFSIA's competition here
MSADF vs INTAF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, INTAF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while INTAF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas INTAF's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to INTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check INTAF's competition here
MSADF vs ZZHGF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while ZZHGF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check ZZHGF's competition here
MSADF vs LNDAF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while LNDAF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to LNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check LNDAF's competition here
MSADF vs FFHPF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to FFHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FFHPF's competition here
MSADF vs FXFHF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FXFHF's competition here
MSADF vs FAXRF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FAXRF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FAXRF's competition here
MSADF vs EGFHF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to EGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check EGFHF's competition here
MSADF vs FIGP Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FIGP trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FIGP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FIGP's competition here
MSADF vs SGYI Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while SGYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to SGYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check SGYI's competition here
MSADF vs MAJCQ Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to MAJCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check MAJCQ's competition here
MSADF vs AFHIF Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFHIF's competition here
MSADF vs FNHCQ Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is more volatile compared to FNHCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check FNHCQ's competition here
MSADF vs SBBG Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SBBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while SBBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check SBBG's competition here
MSADF vs AFHIQ Comparison August 2025
MSADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSADF stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AFHIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MSADF is priced at $22.89, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSADF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.68, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSADF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSADF is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSADF.Check AFHIQ's competition here