Marlowe plc
Marlowe plc MRLWF Peers
See (MRLWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRLWF | $5.90 | -1.80% | 463.3M | 84.29 | $0.07 | N/A |
| ASAZY | $16.57 | +0.12% | 36.8B | 24.73 | $0.67 | +1.70% |
| ASAZF | $33.00 | +0.00% | 34.8B | 24.44 | $1.35 | +1.68% |
| SOMLF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 15B | 20.45 | $1.76 | +1.84% |
| SCTBF | $15.00 | -2.28% | 8.2B | 15.15 | $0.99 | +2.69% |
| SCTBY | $14.59 | -5.26% | 8.2B | 15.04 | $0.97 | +2.74% |
| SOMLY | $8.94 | -1.32% | 7.5B | 20.39 | $0.44 | +1.02% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 15.68 | $2.52 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| CRFQF | $2.33 | -6.80% | 223.8M | 233.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MRLWF vs ASAZY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ASAZY trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ASAZF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ASAZF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SOMLF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SOMLF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SCTBF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SCTBF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SCTBY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SCTBY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SOMLY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SOMLY trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs LOIMF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SOHGF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs CRFQF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ICTSF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ICTSF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs GKPRF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while GKPRF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -99.71. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs RSKIA Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while RSKIA trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs WPNNF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SECUF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SECUF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -181.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SECUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PRBCF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs CSTI Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs LDDFF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while LDDFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VOTDF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DADTF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PLRTF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DIGTF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs IWAL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PTEFF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while PTEFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SSECF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs MACE Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ARGL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs WCCP Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 719.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while WCCP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DRNG Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 652.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VCON Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DTII Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 478.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while DTII trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ATWT Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 411.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs LGTT Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs BLPG Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 354.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while BLPG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VSYS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PSGI Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SCTY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs GDSI Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs HCGS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs MIHL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs MGNT Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ABPR Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs WOAM Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PERL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to PERL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ALXXF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while ALXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs EKCS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs EBWK Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SKVY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs HWSY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs CVAS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DIRV Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs GTKP Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PWLK Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VSYM Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs HLCN Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 463.3M. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $5.90, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of 84.29, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.