Marlowe plc
Marlowe plc MRLWF Peers
See (MRLWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRLWF | $4.99 | +5.27% | 391.83M | -166.33 | -$0.03 | +31.06% |
| ASAZY | $16.01 | +0.63% | 35.65B | 23.54 | $0.68 | +1.38% |
| ASAZF | $31.72 | +1.03% | 35.24B | 23.67 | $1.34 | +0.88% |
| SOMLF | $38.19 | +14.34% | 15.87B | 23.43 | $1.63 | +1.73% |
| SOMLY | $9.16 | +1.78% | 15.20B | 22.34 | $0.41 | +0.51% |
| SCTBY | $15.36 | -5.24% | 8.44B | 15.84 | $0.97 | +2.61% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | +4.07% | 8.38B | 15.82 | $0.97 | +2.63% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | N/A | 2.71B | 16.06 | $2.46 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | -80.00% | 2.57B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| CRFQF | $2.33 | -6.80% | 223.79M | 233.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MRLWF vs ASAZY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 35.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ASAZY trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ASAZF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 35.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ASAZF trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SOMLF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SOMLF trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SOMLY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 15.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SOMLY trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SCTBY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SCTBY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and SCTBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs SCTBF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs LOIMF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and LOIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs SOHGF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs CRFQF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ICTSF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 145.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ICTSF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs RSKIA Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 77.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while RSKIA trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs WPNNF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs GKPRF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 34.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while GKPRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SECUF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 32.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SECUF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is 178.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PRBCF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ALXXF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 27.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ALXXF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and ALXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs LDDFF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 12.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while LDDFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs CSTI Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VOTDF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DIGTF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while DIGTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DADTF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and DADTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs IWAL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PLRTF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SSECF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and SSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs MACE Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VCON Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570440.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ATWT Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 480282.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and ATWT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs BLPG Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 467700.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while BLPG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DTII Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 409775.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while DTII trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs DRNG Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 391764.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs LGTT Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384210.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LGTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs WCCP Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 351525.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while WCCP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs VSYS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171810.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PSGI Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138029.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and PSGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs PTEFF Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 117688.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SCTY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112500.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and SCTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs MGNT Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100000.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs GDSI Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95353.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and GDSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs HCGS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77203.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs MIHL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75588.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs SKVY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 60372.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ABPR Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49298.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and ABPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs WOAM Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32814.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WOAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs PERL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28340.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PERL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and PERL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs EKCS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21258.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs EBWK Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13659.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs HWSY Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9087.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HWSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs CVAS Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7498.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CVAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRLWF.
MRLWF vs ARGL Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 741.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and ARGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MRLWF vs DIRV Comparison
MRLWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRLWF stands at 391.83M. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRLWF is priced at $4.99, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRLWF currently has a P/E ratio of -166.33, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRLWF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRLWF and DIRV have similar daily volatility (0.00).