Margo Caribe Inc.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, WFAFY has a market cap of 60.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while WFAFY trades at $26.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas WFAFY's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to WFAFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to WFAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, WFAFF has a market cap of 50.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while WFAFF trades at $44.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas WFAFF's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to WFAFF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to WFAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, KGFHF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while KGFHF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas KGFHF's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to KGFHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to KGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, KGFHY has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while KGFHY trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas KGFHY's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to KGFHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to KGFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, HPCRF has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while HPCRF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas HPCRF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to HPCRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to HPCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, MDIYF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while MDIYF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas MDIYF's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to MDIYF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to MDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, FKRAF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while FKRAF trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas FKRAF's P/E ratio is 105.33. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to FKRAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to FKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, HBBHF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while HBBHF trades at $75.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas HBBHF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to HBBHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is less volatile compared to HBBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, CBUDY has a market cap of 494.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while CBUDY trades at $21.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas CBUDY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to CBUDY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to CBUDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, MDOUF has a market cap of 142.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while MDOUF trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas MDOUF's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to MDOUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to MDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, TPTJF has a market cap of 92.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while TPTJF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas TPTJF's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to TPTJF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to TPTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, CLWY has a market cap of 53.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while CLWY trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas CLWY's P/E ratio is 48.57. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to CLWY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is more volatile compared to CLWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.

MRGO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRGO stands at 34.34M. In comparison, YGTYF has a market cap of 1000.00. Regarding current trading prices, MRGO is priced at $12.00, while YGTYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRGO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas YGTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRGO's ROE is +1.64%, compared to YGTYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRGO is less volatile compared to YGTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRGO.