Macquarie Group Limited

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while MCQEF trades at $156.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CIIHF trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CIIHY trades at $30.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while NRSCF trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while HUATF trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CMSQF trades at $24.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CMSQY trades at $26.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CNICF trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while HAITY trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DSECF trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DSEEY trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while IGGHY trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CLPE trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while FNNTF trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while TCAPF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while LTSAP trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while MAUSY trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while LTSA trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while MNXBF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 785.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CCORF trades at $7.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 770.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CBGPY trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while LKADF trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 688.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CNSRF trades at $10.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while PHIG trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 357M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while ABGSF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CESTY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CYFRF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 176.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CESTF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while APPCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while ABIT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while NPPTF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while GEVI trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while PNPFF trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while STGC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CURN trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while XAUMF trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while HAFG trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DMGGF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BULT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DBKSF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while EBML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while SMURF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while FDCT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while HYHDF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BCNWF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while FWAV trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DYNA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while MATEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while TRAA trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while ABSOF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while ITEX trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BTCWF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CCPUF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while PHIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BZRD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while GRNBF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to GRNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while CRKR trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BLQC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is less volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while FNDM trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.

MQBKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MQBKY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MQBKY is priced at $150.64, while PIHG trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MQBKY currently has a P/E ratio of 20.96, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, MQBKY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MQBKY is more volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQBKY.