MIPS AB (publ)
MIPS AB (publ) (MPZAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MPZAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPZAF | $44.60 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 81.09 | $0.55 | +1.50% |
| NCBDY | $16.35 | -0.24% | 42.7B | 24.50 | $0.67 | +0.80% |
| OLCLF | $23.74 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 46.55 | $0.51 | +0.40% |
| CUKPF | $27.10 | +0.00% | 38.8B | 14.19 | $1.91 | N/A |
| ANPDF | $12.75 | +9.44% | 35.4B | 16.78 | $0.76 | +2.37% |
| OLCLY | $21.15 | +1.00% | 35.3B | 42.28 | $0.51 | +0.36% |
| ANPDY | $294.88 | +0.77% | 32.9B | 15.58 | $18.90 | +2.57% |
| NCBDF | $33.13 | +10.43% | 21.1B | 24.54 | $1.35 | +1.44% |
| SHMDF | $121.75 | -12.65% | 10.7B | 44.11 | $2.76 | +1.71% |
| SMNNY | $11.33 | -12.98% | 9.9B | 40.18 | $0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MPZAF vs NCBDY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while NCBDY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check NCBDY's competition here
MPZAF vs OLCLF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while OLCLF trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check OLCLF's competition here
MPZAF vs CUKPF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CUKPF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check CUKPF's competition here
MPZAF vs ANPDF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while ANPDF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and ANPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANPDF's competition here
MPZAF vs OLCLY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while OLCLY trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check OLCLY's competition here
MPZAF vs ANPDY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while ANPDY trades at $294.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check ANPDY's competition here
MPZAF vs NCBDF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while NCBDF trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and NCBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCBDF's competition here
MPZAF vs SHMDF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while SHMDF trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to SHMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check SHMDF's competition here
MPZAF vs SMNNY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while SMNNY trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check SMNNY's competition here
MPZAF vs GMWKF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while GMWKF trades at $218.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check GMWKF's competition here
MPZAF vs THUPY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while THUPY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check THUPY's competition here
MPZAF vs LNNGF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while LNNGF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and LNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNNGF's competition here
MPZAF vs LNNGY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while LNNGY trades at $53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check LNNGY's competition here
MPZAF vs THLPF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and THLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THLPF's competition here
MPZAF vs YAMCF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while YAMCF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and YAMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMCF's competition here
MPZAF vs NINOY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while NINOY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 82.28. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check NINOY's competition here
MPZAF vs YAMCY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while YAMCY trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and YAMCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMCY's competition here
MPZAF vs NINOF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and NINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NINOF's competition here
MPZAF vs TCCHF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and TCCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCCHF's competition here
MPZAF vs TOMYY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check TOMYY's competition here
MPZAF vs RNDOF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check RNDOF's competition here
MPZAF vs BSFFF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BSFFF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 201.79. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and BSFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSFFF's competition here
MPZAF vs SNMSF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while SNMSF trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check SNMSF's competition here
MPZAF vs YONXF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and YONXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YONXF's competition here
MPZAF vs CTVIF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CTVIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check CTVIF's competition here
MPZAF vs DTCGF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check DTCGF's competition here
MPZAF vs DRMMF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while DRMMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and DRMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRMMF's competition here
MPZAF vs CLPIF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CLPIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and CLPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPIF's competition here
MPZAF vs HRVFF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while HRVFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and HRVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRVFF's competition here
MPZAF vs HISJF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and HISJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HISJF's competition here
MPZAF vs MPZAY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check MPZAY's competition here
MPZAF vs BTEAF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and BTEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEAF's competition here
MPZAF vs TNIEF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while TNIEF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check TNIEF's competition here
MPZAF vs SHOFF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while SHOFF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and SHOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHOFF's competition here
MPZAF vs UETMF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 558.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check UETMF's competition here
MPZAF vs VVCHF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while VVCHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and VVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VVCHF's competition here
MPZAF vs CLKXF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CLKXF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and CLKXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLKXF's competition here
MPZAF vs OQLGF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and OQLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OQLGF's competition here
MPZAF vs GYYMF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and GYYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYYMF's competition here
MPZAF vs GBBYF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check GBBYF's competition here
MPZAF vs FOCIF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and FOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOCIF's competition here
MPZAF vs PYHOF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and PYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYHOF's competition here
MPZAF vs RPNMF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check RPNMF's competition here
MPZAF vs KICK Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check KICK's competition here
MPZAF vs BOLL Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and BOLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLL's competition here
MPZAF vs PMTYF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while PMTYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and PMTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMTYF's competition here
MPZAF vs CGROF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check CGROF's competition here
MPZAF vs GFIZF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and GFIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFIZF's competition here
MPZAF vs CNLFF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check CNLFF's competition here
MPZAF vs PRKA Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while PRKA trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and PRKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRKA's competition here
MPZAF vs KENS Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while KENS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KENS's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and KENS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KENS's competition here
MPZAF vs DSHK Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check DSHK's competition here
MPZAF vs TOYRF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while TOYRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and TOYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOYRF's competition here
MPZAF vs BWMG Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BWMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BWMG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check BWMG's competition here
MPZAF vs PFFEF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and PFFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFFEF's competition here
MPZAF vs VIRA Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and VIRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIRA's competition here
MPZAF vs GTHKF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and GTHKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTHKF's competition here
MPZAF vs QRSM Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and QRSM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QRSM's competition here
MPZAF vs BTDG Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check BTDG's competition here
MPZAF vs BFXXQ Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and BFXXQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFXXQ's competition here
MPZAF vs MSET Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and MSET have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSET's competition here
MPZAF vs SPQS Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check SPQS's competition here
MPZAF vs TRBX Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and TRBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRBX's competition here
MPZAF vs VMHG Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 152.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check VMHG's competition here
MPZAF vs XFTB Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and XFTB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XFTB's competition here
MPZAF vs VTMB Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and VTMB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMB's competition here
MPZAF vs ECMH Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and ECMH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECMH's competition here
MPZAF vs DAAT Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and DAAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAAT's competition here
MPZAF vs ALTD Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and ALTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTD's competition here
MPZAF vs OMWS Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and OMWS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OMWS's competition here
MPZAF vs JMIH Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and JMIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMIH's competition here
MPZAF vs GLFN Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and GLFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLFN's competition here
MPZAF vs LCLP Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and LCLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCLP's competition here
MPZAF vs ROCLF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and ROCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROCLF's competition here
MPZAF vs PRXIQ Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and PRXIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRXIQ's competition here
MPZAF vs BYDC Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and BYDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYDC's competition here
MPZAF vs FTFY Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPZAF.Check FTFY's competition here
MPZAF vs WMGPF Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and WMGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WMGPF's competition here
MPZAF vs CLUBQ Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and CLUBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLUBQ's competition here
MPZAF vs TVPC Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and TVPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVPC's competition here
MPZAF vs CLVFA Comparison July 2025
MPZAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPZAF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPZAF is priced at $44.60, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPZAF currently has a P/E ratio of 81.09, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPZAF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPZAF and CLVFA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLVFA's competition here