Empire Diversified Energy, Inc.
Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. MPIR Peers
See (MPIR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPIR | $0.08 | -11.11% | 41.6M | -0.89 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| STRNY | $37.09 | -0.83% | 11.1B | 36.01 | $1.03 | +4.04% |
| UUGRY | $31.18 | +0.32% | 10.6B | 29.98 | $1.04 | +4.12% |
| UUGWF | $14.86 | N/A | 10.1B | 28.58 | $0.52 | +4.31% |
| SVTRF | $32.39 | +1.41% | 9.7B | 31.75 | $1.02 | +4.66% |
| GGDVY | $40.45 | -3.44% | 5.3B | 10.09 | $4.01 | +6.26% |
| GGDVF | $0.77 | -1.28% | 5B | 9.63 | $0.08 | +6.05% |
| BJWTY | $24.00 | -3.38% | 3.4B | 16.33 | $1.47 | +0.82% |
| BJWTF | $0.33 | +9.33% | 3.3B | 16.40 | $0.02 | +0.78% |
| PEGRF | $6.88 | -0.07% | 3.2B | -45.83 | -$0.15 | +7.77% |
Stock Comparison
MPIR vs STRNY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, STRNY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while STRNY trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas STRNY's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to STRNY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to STRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs UUGRY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, UUGRY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while UUGRY trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas UUGRY's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UUGRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to UUGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs UUGWF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, UUGWF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while UUGWF trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas UUGWF's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UUGWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to UUGWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs SVTRF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, SVTRF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while SVTRF trades at $32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas SVTRF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to SVTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs GGDVY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, GGDVY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while GGDVY trades at $40.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas GGDVY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GGDVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to GGDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs GGDVF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, GGDVF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while GGDVF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas GGDVF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GGDVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to GGDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs BJWTY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, BJWTY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while BJWTY trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas BJWTY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BJWTY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to BJWTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs BJWTF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, BJWTF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while BJWTF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas BJWTF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BJWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to BJWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs PEGRF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, PEGRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while PEGRF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas PEGRF's P/E ratio is -45.83. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PEGRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to PEGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs PEGRY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, PEGRY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while PEGRY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas PEGRY's P/E ratio is -44.35. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PEGRY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to PEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs MWTCY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, MWTCY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while MWTCY trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas MWTCY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MWTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to MWTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs CWAFF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, CWAFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while CWAFF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas CWAFF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CWAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to CWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs MWTCF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, MWTCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while MWTCF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas MWTCF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MWTCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to MWTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs TTAPF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, TTAPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while TTAPF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas TTAPF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTAPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to TTAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs TTAPY Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, TTAPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while TTAPY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas TTAPY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTAPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to TTAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs MSEXP Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, MSEXP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while MSEXP trades at $535.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas MSEXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MSEXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to MSEXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs TTWPF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, TTWPF has a market cap of 917.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while TTWPF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas TTWPF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTWPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to TTWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs AHWSF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, AHWSF has a market cap of 862.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while AHWSF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas AHWSF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AHWSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is less volatile compared to AHWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs SGXXF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, SGXXF has a market cap of 579M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while SGXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas SGXXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SGXXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is less volatile compared to SGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs BOTRF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, BOTRF has a market cap of 486.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while BOTRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas BOTRF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BOTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to BOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs ARTNB Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, ARTNB has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while ARTNB trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas ARTNB's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARTNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to ARTNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs HEOFF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, HEOFF has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while HEOFF trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas HEOFF's P/E ratio is -312.01. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HEOFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to HEOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs AWAEF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, AWAEF has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while AWAEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas AWAEF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AWAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is less volatile compared to AWAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs CETI Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, CETI has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while CETI trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas CETI's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CETI's ROE of -4.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to CETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs DOMWF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, DOMWF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while DOMWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas DOMWF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DOMWF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to DOMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs PUFLF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, PUFLF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while PUFLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas PUFLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PUFLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to PUFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs AEPT Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, AEPT has a market cap of 139.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while AEPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas AEPT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AEPT's ROE of +3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to AEPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs CNQQF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, CNQQF has a market cap of 79.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while CNQQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas CNQQF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNQQF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to CNQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs HYFXF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, HYFXF has a market cap of 78.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while HYFXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas HYFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HYFXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is less volatile compared to HYFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs ACGPF Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, ACGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while ACGPF trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas ACGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ACGPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to ACGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.
MPIR vs TORW Comparison
MPIR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPIR stands at 41.6M. In comparison, TORW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MPIR is priced at $0.08, while TORW trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPIR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas TORW's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, MPIR's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TORW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPIR is more volatile compared to TORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPIR.