PageGroup plc
PageGroup plc MPGPY Peers
See (MPGPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPGPY | $15.00 | N/A | 2.34B | 15.79 | $0.95 | +2.49% |
| RCRRF | $60.00 | +5.56% | 88.00B | 35.29 | $1.70 | +0.27% |
| RCRUY | $11.58 | -1.89% | 84.94B | 34.06 | $0.34 | +0.09% |
| RANJY | $21.09 | +1.18% | 14.78B | 62.03 | $0.34 | +9.03% |
| AHEXY | $14.46 | +3.69% | 9.68B | 14.17 | $1.02 | +2.46% |
| RANJF | $37.40 | N/A | 6.55B | 54.20 | $0.69 | +9.40% |
| SKLTY | $26.24 | -0.28% | 4.68B | 174.92 | $0.15 | +1.19% |
| AHEXF | $25.86 | N/A | 4.33B | 12.68 | $2.04 | +5.15% |
| TEMPF | $1.62 | N/A | 3.59B | 16.20 | $0.10 | +0.03% |
| TCCPY | $4.58 | -1.08% | 2.40B | 19.91 | $0.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MPGPY vs RCRRF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RCRRF has a market cap of 88.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while RCRRF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas RCRRF's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to RCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs RCRUY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RCRUY has a market cap of 84.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while RCRUY trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas RCRUY's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to RCRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs RANJY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RANJY has a market cap of 14.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while RANJY trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas RANJY's P/E ratio is 62.03. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RANJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to RANJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs AHEXY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AHEXY has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while AHEXY trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas AHEXY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHEXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to AHEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs RANJF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RANJF has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while RANJF trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas RANJF's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RANJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to RANJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs SKLTY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SKLTY has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while SKLTY trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas SKLTY's P/E ratio is 174.92. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKLTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to SKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs AHEXF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AHEXF has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while AHEXF trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas AHEXF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHEXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to AHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs TEMPF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TEMPF has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while TEMPF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas TEMPF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEMPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to TEMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs TCCPY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TCCPY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while TCCPY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas TCCPY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCCPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to TCCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs TXHPF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TXHPF has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while TXHPF trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas TXHPF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TXHPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to TXHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs HAYPY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, HAYPY has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while HAYPY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas HAYPY's P/E ratio is -80.75. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAYPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to HAYPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs MEITF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MEITF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while MEITF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas MEITF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MEITF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to MEITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs MPGPF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MPGPF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while MPGPF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas MPGPF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MPGPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to MPGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs ENJPY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ENJPY has a market cap of 715.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while ENJPY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas ENJPY's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENJPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is less volatile compared to ENJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs IGPPF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, IGPPF has a market cap of 498.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while IGPPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas IGPPF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IGPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to IGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs TGDLF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TGDLF has a market cap of 308.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while TGDLF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas TGDLF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TGDLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to TGDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs CAEEF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CAEEF has a market cap of 55.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while CAEEF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas CAEEF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAEEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to CAEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs CWLPF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CWLPF has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while CWLPF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas CWLPF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWLPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to CWLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs RLBY Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RLBY has a market cap of 14.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while RLBY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas RLBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLBY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to RLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs LTNC Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, LTNC has a market cap of 6.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while LTNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas LTNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTNC's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to LTNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs TREP Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TREP has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while TREP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas TREP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TREP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to TREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs FTRS Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, FTRS has a market cap of 849478.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while FTRS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas FTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FTRS's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to FTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs RVLTF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RVLTF has a market cap of 521011.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while RVLTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas RVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RVLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is less volatile compared to RVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs WDHR Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, WDHR has a market cap of 467189.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while WDHR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas WDHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDHR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is less volatile compared to WDHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs PBHG Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PBHG has a market cap of 459500.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while PBHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas PBHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to PBHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs HIRRF Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, HIRRF has a market cap of 413508.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while HIRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas HIRRF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HIRRF's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to HIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs GXXM Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GXXM has a market cap of 240561.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while GXXM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas GXXM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GXXM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to GXXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs SSET Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SSET has a market cap of 85139.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while SSET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas SSET's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSET's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to SSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs MCTH Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MCTH has a market cap of 2450.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while MCTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas MCTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCTH's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is less volatile compared to MCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs CTPR Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CTPR has a market cap of 875.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while CTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas CTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is less volatile compared to CTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.
MPGPY vs NZIH Comparison
MPGPY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MPGPY stands at 2.34B. In comparison, NZIH has a market cap of 223.00. Regarding current trading prices, MPGPY is priced at $15.00, while NZIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MPGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.79, whereas NZIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MPGPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NZIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MPGPY is more volatile compared to NZIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MPGPY.