ECMOHO Limited

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while AMZN trades at $205.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 281.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BABA trades at $117.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 128.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while MELI trades at $2,543.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 62.59. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while SE trades at $161.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 112.66. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ORLY trades at $1,352.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CVNA trades at $319.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 110.98. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while AZO trades at $3,688.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CPNG trades at $27.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 199.32. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while JD trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while VIPS trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while PDD trades at $98.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while EBAY trades at $72.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while TSCO trades at $48.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while WSM trades at $164.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ULTA trades at $422.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CHWY trades at $44.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while GPC trades at $126.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CASY trades at $440.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while DKS trades at $181.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BBY trades at $66.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while GME trades at $29.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 89.58. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CART trades at $45.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while MUSA trades at $433.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while FIVE trades at $116.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BBWI trades at $28.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ETSY trades at $52.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while W trades at $42.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas W's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while GLBE trades at $31.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -84.91. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while RH trades at $184.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while AAP trades at $48.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ASO trades at $41.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while SVV trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 72.54. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while EYE trades at $19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -62.34. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while WINA trades at $428.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while RVLV trades at $20.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while MNSO trades at $17.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while EVGO trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while EVGOW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 992.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while WOOF trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 892.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while SBH trades at $8.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 879.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while RERE trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 879M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while OLPX trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 852.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while TDUP trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -24.86. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 851.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while HEPS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 724.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while LQDT trades at $23.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 687.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BBW trades at $52.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 549M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while HNST trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -249.00. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ARKO trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 149.33. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 491.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ODP trades at $16.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 462.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while HZO trades at $21.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BNED trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 381.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BYON trades at $6.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 334.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CHPT trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 314M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while FLWS trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BWMX trades at $8.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -41.55. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 269.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while LE trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BARK trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while LOGC trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BARK-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while JMIA trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 173.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BZUN trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while AKA trades at $12.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while DADA trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while OCG trades at $5.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.65. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while WBUY trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while NEGG trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while DIBS trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while SPWH trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while GRWG trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while NHTC trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 121.75. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while PRTS trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while QVCGP trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while HOUR trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 131.00. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while QVCGA trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BGFV trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while TLF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while YSG trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while KIRK trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while JBDI trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while CGTL trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while QVCGB trades at $52.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ZOOZ trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while IPW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.

MOHO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MOHO stands at 0. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOHO is priced at $0.10, while ZKH trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MOHO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, MOHO's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOHO is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOHO.