Altria Group, Inc.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, PM has a market cap of 259.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while PM trades at $166.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PM's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to PM's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check PM's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, BTI has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while BTI trades at $56.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BTI's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to BTI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is more volatile compared to BTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check BTI's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, RLX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while RLX trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas RLX's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to RLX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is more volatile compared to RLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check RLX's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, VGR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while VGR trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas VGR's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to VGR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is more volatile compared to VGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check VGR's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, TPB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while TPB trades at $92.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TPB's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to TPB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to TPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check TPB's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, UVV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while UVV trades at $54.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas UVV's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to UVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is more volatile compared to UVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check UVV's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, ISPR has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while ISPR trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ISPR's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to ISPR's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to ISPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check ISPR's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, KAVL has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while KAVL trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas KAVL's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to KAVL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to KAVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check KAVL's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, GNLN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while GNLN trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas GNLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to GNLN's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to GNLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check GNLN's competition here

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 106.1B. In comparison, XXII has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $63.15, while XXII trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas XXII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -2.82%, compared to XXII's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to XXII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.Check XXII's competition here