Altria Group, Inc.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, PM has a market cap of 282.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while PM trades at $181.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas PM's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to PM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, BTI has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while BTI trades at $47.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas BTI's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to BTI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to BTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, RLX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while RLX trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas RLX's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to RLX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to RLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, VGR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while VGR trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas VGR's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to VGR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is more volatile compared to VGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, UVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while UVV trades at $60.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas UVV's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to UVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to UVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, TPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while TPB trades at $76.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TPB's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to TPB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to TPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, ISPR has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while ISPR trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas ISPR's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to ISPR's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to ISPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, GNLN has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while GNLN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas GNLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to GNLN's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to GNLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, KAVL has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while KAVL trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas KAVL's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to KAVL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to KAVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.

MO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MO stands at 99.8B. In comparison, XXII has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MO is priced at $59.23, while XXII trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas XXII's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MO's ROE is -3.34%, compared to XXII's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MO is less volatile compared to XXII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MO.