Mansfelder Metals Ltd.
Mansfelder Metals Ltd. (MNSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aluminum Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNSF | $0.00 | -0.00% | 1.9K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CHHQY | $25.74 | +0.00% | 24.5B | 7.82 | $3.29 | +7.98% |
| CHHQF | $2.50 | +0.00% | 23.2B | 7.58 | $0.33 | +28.80% |
| ALMMF | $0.78 | -3.42% | 17B | 7.13 | $0.11 | +3.82% |
| NHYDY | $6.30 | +0.64% | 12.4B | 13.13 | $0.48 | +3.46% |
| NHYKF | $6.47 | +0.82% | 12.3B | 13.16 | $0.48 | +3.44% |
| ACHHY | $10.12 | -5.24% | 11.2B | 12.19 | $0.83 | N/A |
| AWCMY | $3.69 | -2.89% | 10.7B | -17.57 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AWCMF | $1.11 | +0.91% | 3.2B | -22.20 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| EORBF | $0.00 | -0.00% | 91.7M | N/A | -$0.48 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNSF vs CHHQY Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CHHQY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while CHHQY trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHHQY's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CHHQY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to CHHQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check CHHQY's competition here
MNSF vs CHHQF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CHHQF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while CHHQF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHHQF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CHHQF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to CHHQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check CHHQF's competition here
MNSF vs ALMMF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ALMMF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while ALMMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMMF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to ALMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check ALMMF's competition here
MNSF vs NHYDY Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, NHYDY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while NHYDY trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHYDY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NHYDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to NHYDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check NHYDY's competition here
MNSF vs NHYKF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, NHYKF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while NHYKF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHYKF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NHYKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to NHYKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check NHYKF's competition here
MNSF vs ACHHY Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ACHHY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while ACHHY trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACHHY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ACHHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to ACHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check ACHHY's competition here
MNSF vs AWCMY Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AWCMY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while AWCMY trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWCMY's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AWCMY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to AWCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check AWCMY's competition here
MNSF vs AWCMF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AWCMF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while AWCMF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWCMF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AWCMF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to AWCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check AWCMF's competition here
MNSF vs EORBF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, EORBF has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while EORBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EORBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EORBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF and EORBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EORBF's competition here
MNSF vs BXRDF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, BXRDF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while BXRDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXRDF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BXRDF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF and BXRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BXRDF's competition here
MNSF vs AFML Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, AFML has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while AFML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AFML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF and AFML have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFML's competition here
MNSF vs NORNQ Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, NORNQ has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while NORNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NORNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NORNQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF and NORNQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NORNQ's competition here
MNSF vs ORMTQ Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, ORMTQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while ORMTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORMTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ORMTQ's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF is less volatile compared to ORMTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSF.Check ORMTQ's competition here
MNSF vs UNRIF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, UNRIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while UNRIF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNRIF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UNRIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF and UNRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNRIF's competition here
MNSF vs CHZHF Comparison July 2025
MNSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSF stands at 1.9K. In comparison, CHZHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNSF is priced at $0.00, while CHZHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHZHF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, MNSF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CHZHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNSF and CHZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZHF's competition here