BetaShares Global Gold Miners ETF - Currency Hedged
BetaShares Global Gold Miners ETF - Currency Hedged (MNRS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNRS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNRS.AX | A$9.37 | -0.53% | 101.4M | 23.50 | A$0.40 | +1.11% |
| IOO.AX | A$170.96 | -1.58% | 7.1B | 26.33 | A$6.49 | +1.18% |
| IXJ.AX | A$127.50 | -2.04% | 4.4B | 23.41 | A$5.45 | +1.67% |
| ETHI.AX | A$15.83 | -0.50% | 3.5B | 21.58 | A$0.73 | +2.21% |
| IFRA.AX | A$22.79 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 19.78 | A$1.15 | +3.20% |
| IXI.AX | A$98.69 | +0.11% | 1.4B | 23.57 | A$4.19 | +2.19% |
| HACK.AX | A$14.97 | -1.19% | 1.3B | 30.97 | A$0.48 | +2.90% |
| PGF.AX | A$2.71 | +3.04% | 1.3B | 9.03 | A$0.30 | +4.06% |
| NGI.AX | A$1.91 | -0.26% | 936.1M | 3.90 | A$0.49 | +2.34% |
| WGB.AX | A$2.57 | +0.78% | 917.8M | 7.56 | A$0.34 | +6.42% |
Stock Comparison
MNRS.AX vs IOO.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, IOO.AX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while IOO.AX trades at A$170.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas IOO.AX's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to IOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check IOO.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs IXJ.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, IXJ.AX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while IXJ.AX trades at A$127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas IXJ.AX's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to IXJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check IXJ.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs ETHI.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, ETHI.AX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while ETHI.AX trades at A$15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas ETHI.AX's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETHI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to ETHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check ETHI.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs IFRA.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, IFRA.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while IFRA.AX trades at A$22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas IFRA.AX's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to IFRA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check IFRA.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs IXI.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, IXI.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while IXI.AX trades at A$98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas IXI.AX's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to IXI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check IXI.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs HACK.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, HACK.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while HACK.AX trades at A$14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas HACK.AX's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HACK.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to HACK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check HACK.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs PGF.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, PGF.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while PGF.AX trades at A$2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas PGF.AX's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGF.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to PGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check PGF.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs NGI.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, NGI.AX has a market cap of 936.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while NGI.AX trades at A$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas NGI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGI.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to NGI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check NGI.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs WGB.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, WGB.AX has a market cap of 917.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while WGB.AX trades at A$2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas WGB.AX's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGB.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to WGB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check WGB.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs QLTY.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, QLTY.AX has a market cap of 790.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while QLTY.AX trades at A$31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas QLTY.AX's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QLTY.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to QLTY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check QLTY.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs VVLU.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, VVLU.AX has a market cap of 785.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while VVLU.AX trades at A$72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas VVLU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVLU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to VVLU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check VVLU.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs FGG.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, FGG.AX has a market cap of 620.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while FGG.AX trades at A$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas FGG.AX's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGG.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to FGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check FGG.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs IHOO.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, IHOO.AX has a market cap of 555M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while IHOO.AX trades at A$200.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas IHOO.AX's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to IHOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check IHOO.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs VBLD.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, VBLD.AX has a market cap of 491.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while VBLD.AX trades at A$73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas VBLD.AX's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to VBLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check VBLD.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs DJRE.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, DJRE.AX has a market cap of 438.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while DJRE.AX trades at A$21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas DJRE.AX's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DJRE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to DJRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check DJRE.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs ALI.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, ALI.AX has a market cap of 417.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while ALI.AX trades at A$2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas ALI.AX's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALI.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to ALI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check ALI.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs WCMQ.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, WCMQ.AX has a market cap of 378.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while WCMQ.AX trades at A$10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas WCMQ.AX's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCMQ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to WCMQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check WCMQ.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs WDIV.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, WDIV.AX has a market cap of 291.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while WDIV.AX trades at A$21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas WDIV.AX's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDIV.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to WDIV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check WDIV.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs RBTZ.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, RBTZ.AX has a market cap of 289.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while RBTZ.AX trades at A$14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas RBTZ.AX's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTZ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to RBTZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check RBTZ.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs ESTX.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, ESTX.AX has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while ESTX.AX trades at A$103.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas ESTX.AX's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESTX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to ESTX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check ESTX.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs GVF.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, GVF.AX has a market cap of 281.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while GVF.AX trades at A$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas GVF.AX's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GVF.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to GVF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check GVF.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs FEMX.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, FEMX.AX has a market cap of 177.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while FEMX.AX trades at A$6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas FEMX.AX's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to FEMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check FEMX.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs FUEL.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, FUEL.AX has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while FUEL.AX trades at A$6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas FUEL.AX's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUEL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to FUEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check FUEL.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs TGF.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, TGF.AX has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while TGF.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas TGF.AX's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGF.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to TGF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check TGF.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs GDC.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, GDC.AX has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while GDC.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas GDC.AX's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDC.AX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to GDC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check GDC.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs BNKS.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, BNKS.AX has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while BNKS.AX trades at A$10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas BNKS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKS.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to BNKS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check BNKS.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs ZYAU.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, ZYAU.AX has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while ZYAU.AX trades at A$9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas ZYAU.AX's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYAU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to ZYAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check ZYAU.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs ZYUS.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, ZYUS.AX has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while ZYUS.AX trades at A$14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas ZYUS.AX's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYUS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to ZYUS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check ZYUS.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs FOOD.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, FOOD.AX has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while FOOD.AX trades at A$6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas FOOD.AX's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to FOOD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check FOOD.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs GFL.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, GFL.AX has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while GFL.AX trades at A$3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas GFL.AX's P/E ratio is -33.36. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to GFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check GFL.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs UBW.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, UBW.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while UBW.AX trades at A$28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas UBW.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBW.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to UBW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check UBW.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs FPC.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, FPC.AX has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while FPC.AX trades at A$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas FPC.AX's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPC.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to FPC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check FPC.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs CURE.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, CURE.AX has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while CURE.AX trades at A$45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas CURE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to CURE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check CURE.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs HGEN.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, HGEN.AX has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while HGEN.AX trades at A$5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas HGEN.AX's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGEN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to HGEN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check HGEN.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs VMIN.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, VMIN.AX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while VMIN.AX trades at A$61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas VMIN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMIN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to VMIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check VMIN.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs GOLD.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, GOLD.AX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while GOLD.AX trades at A$47.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas GOLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to GOLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check GOLD.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs APL.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, APL.AX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while APL.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas APL.AX's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APL.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to APL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check APL.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs UBP.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, UBP.AX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while UBP.AX trades at A$28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas UBP.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBP.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to UBP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check UBP.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs UBJ.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, UBJ.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while UBJ.AX trades at A$23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas UBJ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to UBJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check UBJ.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs MHG.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, MHG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while MHG.AX trades at A$3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas MHG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to MHG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check MHG.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs CGA.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, CGA.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while CGA.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas CGA.AX's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGA.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to CGA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check CGA.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs MGF.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, MGF.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while MGF.AX trades at A$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas MGF.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGF.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to MGF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check MGF.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs WRLD.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, WRLD.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while WRLD.AX trades at A$21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas WRLD.AX's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is more volatile compared to WRLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check WRLD.AX's competition here
MNRS.AX vs HYGG.AX Comparison August 2025
MNRS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRS.AX stands at 101.4M. In comparison, HYGG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNRS.AX is priced at A$9.37, while HYGG.AX trades at A$7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.50, whereas HYGG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNRS.AX is less volatile compared to HYGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRS.AX.Check HYGG.AX's competition here