MetalNRG plc
MetalNRG plc MNRG.L Peers
See (MNRG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNRG.L | £40.00 | -8.05% | 6.9M | -2.35 | -£0.17 | N/A |
| BHP.L | £1,830.00 | -0.87% | 92.9B | 11.02 | £1.66 | +4.97% |
| 0L5V.L | £358.40 | -0.36% | 89.8B | 52.04 | £6.89 | +0.84% |
| 0R2J.L | £161.85 | -5.16% | 85.2B | 69.11 | £2.34 | +0.87% |
| 0L8B.L | £95.46 | -1.92% | 76.8B | 21.60 | £4.42 | +2.79% |
| 0IFA.L | £266.33 | -0.42% | 75.5B | 69.34 | £3.84 | +0.91% |
| RIO.L | £4,355.50 | -0.81% | 74.1B | 8.34 | £5.22 | +7.12% |
| 0HBH.L | £278.17 | -0.05% | 61.9B | 27.71 | £10.04 | +2.54% |
| GLEN.L | £288.10 | -1.62% | 34.4B | -28.81 | -£0.10 | +1.99% |
| 0Z4C.L | £231.20 | -2.78% | 32.8B | 35.01 | £6.60 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
MNRG.L vs BHP.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while BHP.L trades at £1,830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0L5V.L trades at £358.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R2J.L trades at £161.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 69.11. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0L8B.L trades at £95.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0IFA.L trades at £266.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 69.34. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs RIO.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while RIO.L trades at £4,355.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0HBH.L trades at £278.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while GLEN.L trades at £288.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0NHS.L trades at £59.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0K9L.L trades at £121.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0KEI.L trades at £112.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs AAL.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while AAL.L trades at £2,217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0EDD.L trades at £56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0UGS.L trades at £36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -88.61. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0HQU.L trades at £92.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R07.L trades at £38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0LJ9.L trades at £53.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0KXS.L trades at £177.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0K3B.L trades at £35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0LVK.L trades at £72.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0IF3.L trades at £78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0HCB.L trades at £27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0HC7.L trades at £59.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0U6C.L trades at £30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0QYN.L trades at £5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs S32.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while S32.L trades at £144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0HUR.L trades at £55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R0U.L trades at £9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -88.49. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0IK3.L trades at £42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0AHJ.L trades at £13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VBE.L trades at £25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -166.57. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VL5.L trades at £46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R0A.L trades at £6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 209.71. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0L45.L trades at £66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VGM.L trades at £13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0I0H.L trades at £7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VGE.L trades at £17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0QYM.L trades at £9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VOA.L trades at £19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MNRG.L has daily volatility of 16.87 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
MNRG.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R2C.L trades at £5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0NZN.L trades at £884.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0HWG.L trades at £11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0QZ2.L trades at £5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 884M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while ADT1.L trades at £256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 689.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0G5B.L trades at £121.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 503.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0O6D.L trades at £13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0JZT.L trades at £7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 483.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0KD1.L trades at £4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -40.74. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 457M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VIK.L trades at £2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs KMR.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 353.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while KMR.L trades at £400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 345.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R20.L trades at £0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -22.05. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs GFM.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while GFM.L trades at £168.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs SVML.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while SVML.L trades at £34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while SOLG.L trades at £7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0P07.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -20.28. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0RRC.L trades at £4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs KP2.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 164.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while KP2.L trades at £3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs PRE.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while PRE.L trades at £54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while ECOR.L trades at £62.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs BSE.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs TRR.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while CAPD.L trades at £72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 134M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0V46.L trades at £0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0VNO.L trades at £0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs JLP.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while JLP.L trades at £3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while CUSN.L trades at £7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0QQR.L trades at £17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs SAV.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while SAV.L trades at £3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs RBW.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while RBW.L trades at £11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0QVG.L trades at £5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs MKA.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while MKA.L trades at £16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs KOD.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while KOD.L trades at £0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs HE1.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while HE1.L trades at £0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs FAR.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while FAR.L trades at £9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs ATM.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while ATM.L trades at £2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs ALL.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while ALL.L trades at £5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs FOX.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while FOX.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs MET1.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while MET1.L trades at £26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs NMT.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while ZNWD.L trades at £6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs ARS.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while ARS.L trades at £0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 1SN.L trades at £5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs KAV.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while KAV.L trades at £0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs GSP.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs 0V7X.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while 0V7X.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.
MNRG.L vs EMH.L Comparison
MNRG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNRG.L stands at 6.9M. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNRG.L is priced at £40.00, while EMH.L trades at £9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, MNRG.L's ROE is +0.94%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNRG.L is more volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNRG.L.