Merchants' National Properties, Inc.
Merchants' National Properties, Inc. MNPP Peers
See (MNPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNPP | $2,000.00 | -4.53% | 181.18M | 15.23 | $131.33 | +4.00% |
| MTSFF | $9.75 | -7.05% | 27.03B | 15.98 | $0.61 | +2.18% |
| MTSFY | $28.57 | -0.90% | 26.40B | 15.70 | $1.82 | +1.77% |
| MITEF | $17.85 | N/A | 22.24B | 17.50 | $1.02 | +0.01% |
| MITEY | $17.36 | +1.11% | 21.63B | 16.53 | $1.05 | +0.48% |
| HLDVF | $3.10 | +1.64% | 15.01B | 18.24 | $0.17 | +7.43% |
| HLDCY | $3.04 | -1.30% | 14.72B | 17.88 | $0.17 | +7.61% |
| SPHXF | $0.46 | -20.29% | 13.28B | 15.33 | $0.03 | +1.87% |
| CPNNF | $1.80 | N/A | 8.38B | 16.36 | $0.11 | +3.52% |
| PSPSF | $179.55 | +12.92% | 8.24B | 18.59 | $9.66 | +2.52% |
Stock Comparison
MNPP vs MTSFF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, MTSFF has a market cap of 27.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while MTSFF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MTSFF's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTSFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to MTSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs MTSFY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, MTSFY has a market cap of 26.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while MTSFY trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MTSFY's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTSFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to MTSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs MITEF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, MITEF has a market cap of 22.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while MITEF trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MITEF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to MITEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs MITEY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, MITEY has a market cap of 21.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while MITEY trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MITEY's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to MITEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HLDVF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HLDVF has a market cap of 15.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HLDVF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HLDVF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLDVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to HLDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HLDCY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HLDCY has a market cap of 14.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HLDCY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HLDCY's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLDCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to HLDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SPHXF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SPHXF has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SPHXF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SPHXF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to SPHXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs CPNNF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, CPNNF has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while CPNNF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CPNNF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPNNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to CPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs PSPSF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, PSPSF has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while PSPSF trades at $179.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PSPSF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSPSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to PSPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs BALDF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, BALDF has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while BALDF trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BALDF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to BALDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs DITTF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, DITTF has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while DITTF trades at $112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DITTF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DITTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to DITTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs DIFTY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, DIFTY has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while DIFTY trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DIFTY's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIFTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to DIFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs TTUUF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, TTUUF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while TTUUF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TTUUF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTUUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to TTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs TKFOY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, TKFOY has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while TKFOY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TKFOY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKFOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to TKFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs VESTF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, VESTF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while VESTF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas VESTF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VESTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to VESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs AMLLF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, AMLLF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while AMLLF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AMLLF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to AMLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs FSRPF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, FSRPF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while FSRPF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FSRPF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to FSRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs LLESF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, LLESF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while LLESF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas LLESF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLESF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to LLESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs LLESY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, LLESY has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while LLESY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas LLESY's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLESY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to LLESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HUFAF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HUFAF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HUFAF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HUFAF's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUFAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to HUFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs UILCF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, UILCF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while UILCF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UILCF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UILCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to UILCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs UILCY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, UILCY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while UILCY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UILCY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UILCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to UILCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HNLGY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HNLGY has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HNLGY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HNLGY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNLGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to HNLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HNLGF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HNLGF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HNLGF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HNLGF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNLGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to HNLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs NDVLY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, NDVLY has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while NDVLY trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NDVLY's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDVLY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to NDVLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs NWWDF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, NWWDF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while NWWDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NWWDF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWWDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to NWWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs GEAHF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, GEAHF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while GEAHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GEAHF's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEAHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to GEAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs LCOMF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, LCOMF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while LCOMF trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas LCOMF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to LCOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs COYJF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, COYJF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while COYJF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas COYJF's P/E ratio is 200.53. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COYJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to COYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs IRICF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, IRICF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while IRICF trades at $206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IRICF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRICF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to IRICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs MRCBF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, MRCBF has a market cap of 900.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while MRCBF trades at $83.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MRCBF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRCBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to MRCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs GZTGF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, GZTGF has a market cap of 597.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while GZTGF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GZTGF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GZTGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to GZTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs NNXXY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, NNXXY has a market cap of 574.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while NNXXY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NNXXY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to NNXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs GDVTZ Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, GDVTZ has a market cap of 546.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while GDVTZ trades at $500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GDVTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDVTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to GDVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SIOLF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SIOLF has a market cap of 364.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SIOLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SIOLF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIOLF's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to SIOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SIOLY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SIOLY has a market cap of 239.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SIOLY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SIOLY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIOLY's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to SIOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SHTGF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SHTGF has a market cap of 234.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SHTGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SHTGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHTGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to SHTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SYYNY Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SYYNY has a market cap of 200.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SYYNY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SYYNY's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYYNY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to SYYNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs DDCCF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, DDCCF has a market cap of 177.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while DDCCF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DDCCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDCCF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to DDCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SNLKF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SNLKF has a market cap of 103.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SNLKF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SNLKF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNLKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to SNLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs PTPKF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, PTPKF has a market cap of 96.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while PTPKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PTPKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to PTPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs LVSDF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, LVSDF has a market cap of 72.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while LVSDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas LVSDF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVSDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to LVSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs LSIHF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, LSIHF has a market cap of 61.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while LSIHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas LSIHF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSIHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to LSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HGPI Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HGPI has a market cap of 29.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HGPI trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HGPI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to HGPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs ECDP Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, ECDP has a market cap of 16.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while ECDP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ECDP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to ECDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs TRRE Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, TRRE has a market cap of 11.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while TRRE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to TRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs HOOB Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, HOOB has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while HOOB trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HOOB's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOOB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to HOOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs SNNHF Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, SNNHF has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while SNNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SNNHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to SNNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs IDVV Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, IDVV has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while IDVV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IDVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDVV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to IDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs NIHK Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, NIHK has a market cap of 599997.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while NIHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NIHK's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIHK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to NIHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs TDRK Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, TDRK has a market cap of 544075.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while TDRK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TDRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to TDRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs PCLI Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, PCLI has a market cap of 281851.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while PCLI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PCLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to PCLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs FTPM Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, FTPM has a market cap of 247564.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while FTPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FTPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTPM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to FTPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs BRER Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, BRER has a market cap of 164310.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while BRER trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BRER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRER's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to BRER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs CRDV Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, CRDV has a market cap of 34107.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while CRDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CRDV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRDV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is less volatile compared to CRDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.
MNPP vs YRIV Comparison
MNPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNPP stands at 181.18M. In comparison, YRIV has a market cap of 17953.00. Regarding current trading prices, MNPP is priced at $2,000.00, while YRIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNPP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas YRIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNPP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNPP is more volatile compared to YRIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNPP.