Motivating the Masses, Inc.
Motivating the Masses, Inc. (MNMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNMT | $0.00 | +0.00% | 4.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BSEFF | $20.25 | -19.32% | 2B | 2025.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| CEGHF | $0.42 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 20.75 | $0.02 | N/A |
| COGNY | $0.45 | +4.37% | 798.1M | 4.89 | $0.09 | +2.55% |
| IDPUF | $2.50 | +0.00% | 695.8M | 11.36 | $0.22 | +4.79% |
| DTLIF | $11.60 | +0.00% | 636.6M | 22.75 | $0.51 | N/A |
| KLTHF | $0.47 | +0.00% | 491.8M | -2.14 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| YDUQY | $1.50 | +15.89% | 471.4M | -49.83 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| RFLFF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 69.5M | -5.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| RFLFY | $0.49 | +0.00% | 34.2M | -3.28 | -$0.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNMT vs BSEFF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BSEFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while BSEFF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSEFF's P/E ratio is 2025.00. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSEFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to BSEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check BSEFF's competition here
MNMT vs CEGHF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CEGHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while CEGHF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEGHF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CEGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to CEGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check CEGHF's competition here
MNMT vs COGNY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, COGNY has a market cap of 798.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while COGNY trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COGNY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COGNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to COGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check COGNY's competition here
MNMT vs IDPUF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, IDPUF has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while IDPUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDPUF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IDPUF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to IDPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check IDPUF's competition here
MNMT vs DTLIF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DTLIF has a market cap of 636.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while DTLIF trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLIF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DTLIF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to DTLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check DTLIF's competition here
MNMT vs KLTHF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KLTHF has a market cap of 491.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while KLTHF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLTHF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KLTHF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to KLTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check KLTHF's competition here
MNMT vs YDUQY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, YDUQY has a market cap of 471.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while YDUQY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDUQY's P/E ratio is -49.83. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YDUQY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to YDUQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check YDUQY's competition here
MNMT vs RFLFF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RFLFF has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while RFLFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFLFF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RFLFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to RFLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check RFLFF's competition here
MNMT vs RFLFY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RFLFY has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while RFLFY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFLFY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RFLFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to RFLFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check RFLFY's competition here
MNMT vs UMEWF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, UMEWF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while UMEWF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UMEWF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to UMEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check UMEWF's competition here
MNMT vs ZMENY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ZMENY has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while ZMENY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMENY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZMENY's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to ZMENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check ZMENY's competition here
MNMT vs FHSEY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FHSEY has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while FHSEY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHSEY's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FHSEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to FHSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check FHSEY's competition here
MNMT vs EXDW Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EXDW has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while EXDW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXDW's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EXDW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to EXDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check EXDW's competition here
MNMT vs MBAIF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MBAIF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while MBAIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBAIF's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MBAIF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to MBAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check MBAIF's competition here
MNMT vs LTRE Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LTRE has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while LTRE trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRE's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LTRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to LTRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check LTRE's competition here
MNMT vs BRWC Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BRWC has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while BRWC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRWC's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRWC's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to BRWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check BRWC's competition here
MNMT vs QOEG Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, QOEG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while QOEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QOEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QOEG's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to QOEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check QOEG's competition here
MNMT vs BTTUF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BTTUF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while BTTUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTTUF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BTTUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to BTTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check BTTUF's competition here
MNMT vs NAUH Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NAUH has a market cap of 739.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while NAUH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAUH's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NAUH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to NAUH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check NAUH's competition here
MNMT vs PBYA Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PBYA has a market cap of 395.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while PBYA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBYA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PBYA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to PBYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check PBYA's competition here
MNMT vs VCTL Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VCTL has a market cap of 42.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while VCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VCTL's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to VCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check VCTL's competition here
MNMT vs EDMCQ Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EDMCQ has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while EDMCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EDMCQ's ROE of +38.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to EDMCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check EDMCQ's competition here
MNMT vs CHNUF Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CHNUF has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while CHNUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHNUF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to CHNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check CHNUF's competition here
MNMT vs LEAI Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LEAI has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while LEAI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LEAI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to LEAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check LEAI's competition here
MNMT vs ZVOI Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ZVOI has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while ZVOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZVOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZVOI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to ZVOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check ZVOI's competition here
MNMT vs TIGE Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TIGE has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while TIGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TIGE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to TIGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check TIGE's competition here
MNMT vs ESINQ Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ESINQ has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while ESINQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESINQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ESINQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to ESINQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check ESINQ's competition here
MNMT vs NEWYY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NEWYY has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while NEWYY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWYY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEWYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to NEWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check NEWYY's competition here
MNMT vs VRED Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VRED has a market cap of 639. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while VRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to VRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check VRED's competition here
MNMT vs MMTS Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MMTS has a market cap of 379. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while MMTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MMTS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to MMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check MMTS's competition here
MNMT vs BSEFY Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BSEFY has a market cap of 91. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while BSEFY trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSEFY's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSEFY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to BSEFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check BSEFY's competition here
MNMT vs CCHZ Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CCHZ has a market cap of 62. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while CCHZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CCHZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to CCHZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check CCHZ's competition here
MNMT vs YYYH Comparison August 2025
MNMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNMT stands at 4.1M. In comparison, YYYH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, MNMT is priced at $0.00, while YYYH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNMT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YYYH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNMT's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YYYH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNMT is more volatile compared to YYYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNMT.Check YYYH's competition here