The Monks Investment Trust PLC
The Monks Investment Trust PLC MNKS.L Peers
See (MNKS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNKS.L | £1,268.00 | +0.96% | 2.4B | 4.39 | £2.89 | +0.17% |
| UC65.L | £59.28 | +0.20% | 5.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.69% |
| UB02.L | £4,376.00 | -0.11% | 3.8T | N/A | N/A | +1.82% |
| IUSA.L | £4,456.25 | +0.38% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.34% |
| SSAC.L | £7,070.50 | +0.33% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £41,900.00 | +0.99% | 983.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,377.00 | +0.11% | 846.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,817.50 | -0.13% | 787.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| XESC.L | £7,935.00 | -0.11% | 787.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,367.50 | +0.12% | 773.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNKS.L vs UC65.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UC65.L trades at £59.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UB02.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UB02.L trades at £4,376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IUSA.L trades at £4,456.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SSAC.L trades at £7,070.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 983.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while EQGB.L trades at £41,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 846.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SMEA.L trades at £7,377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XESX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 787.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XESX.L trades at £4,817.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XESC.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 787.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XESC.L trades at £7,935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 773.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while MEUD.L trades at £22,367.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IITU.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 738.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IITU.L trades at £2,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 693.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UB0D.L trades at £2,167.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs JT13.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 669.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while JT13.L trades at £593.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 631.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CNAL.L trades at £11,176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 564.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while JPSR.L trades at £1,974.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 549.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IWRD.L trades at £6,226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 533B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XDAX.L trades at £19,056.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 501.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while PHGP.L trades at £22,971.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 489B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while GLDA.L trades at £9,781.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 485.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XMMS.L trades at £4,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 464.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while MXWS.L trades at £9,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 441B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XMUS.L trades at £13,289.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UC44.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 427.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UC44.L trades at £12,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 418.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XMEU.L trades at £8,433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CS51.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 413.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CS51.L trades at £17,352.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs EUE.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 370B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while EUE.L trades at £4,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 369.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IEEM.L trades at £3,504.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UB32.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 349.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UB32.L trades at £8,923.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CACX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 339.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CACX.L trades at £6,641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 306.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SEMA.L trades at £3,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 304.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XSX6.L trades at £11,842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 297.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while GBSS.L trades at £22,618.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 291.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 273.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SGBX.L trades at £23,609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 271.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IWFV.L trades at £3,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 250.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while ISPY.L trades at £2,342.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 237.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CEA1.L trades at £15,008.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 224.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while RBTX.L trades at £1,077.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 222.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 222.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while JRDE.L trades at £3,706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs JERE.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while JERE.L trades at £3,944.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SUES.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 221.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SUES.L trades at £611.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 209B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while PHSP.L trades at £2,451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IUQF.L trades at £1,116.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 196.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while HMEF.L trades at £891.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IWFM.L trades at £6,521.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 183.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XDEV.L trades at £3,746.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SOYU.L trades at £306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 171.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CEUR.L trades at £31,302.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 168.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UIFS.L trades at £1,101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XXSC.L trades at £5,544.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SPGP.L trades at £1,753.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 158.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while PRIR.L trades at £1,476.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while GBSP.L trades at £1,720.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IEFV.L trades at £870.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CU1.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CU1.L trades at £45,942.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while ISP6.L trades at £6,579.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IPRP.L trades at £2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs WATL.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while WATL.L trades at £5,834.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs GILS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while GILS.L trades at £10,159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XZEU.L trades at £2,841.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CUS1.L trades at £38,575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XCX6.L trades at £1,347.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UC79.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UC79.L trades at £1,144.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while 0GWB.IL trades at £486.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs INFL.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 119B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SP5G.L trades at £204.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CG1.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CG1.L trades at £36,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 116.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CSPX.L trades at £644.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CB5.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CB5.L trades at £3,867.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XRSG.L trades at £23,516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IJPN.L trades at £1,390.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 110.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IGSG.L trades at £5,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while JRDM.L trades at £2,374.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while PRIC.L trades at £1,614.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SPES.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SPES.L trades at £4,215.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs H50E.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while H50E.L trades at £4,896.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while SPEX.L trades at £4,457.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IEUX.L trades at £4,109.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XDEM.L trades at £5,489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while RIEG.L trades at £1,452.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IWDA.L trades at £115.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IMV.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IMV.L trades at £5,787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while DAXX.L trades at £18,598.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CSCA.L trades at £17,192.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while MTIX.L trades at £14,161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs UB45.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while UB45.L trades at £6,166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,398.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XDN0.L trades at £4,326.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IUKD.L trades at £850.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while WQDS.L trades at £551.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while EQDS.L trades at £545.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XLKQ.L trades at £52,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs COMM.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while COMM.L trades at £540.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CRPX.L trades at £12,978.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while CSP1.L trades at £47,588.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while IGUS.L trades at £13,806.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while XDEB.L trades at £3,586.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.
MNKS.L vs INAA.L Comparison
MNKS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNKS.L stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNKS.L is priced at £1,268.00, while INAA.L trades at £8,300.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNKS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.39, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNKS.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNKS.L is more volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNKS.L.