Mowi ASA
Mowi ASA MNHVF Peers
See (MNHVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNHVF | $18.35 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 24.47 | $0.75 | +3.48% |
| WLMIF | $2.35 | +0.00% | 14.7B | 12.37 | $0.19 | +5.23% |
| WLMIY | $22.84 | +1.38% | 14.3B | 12.23 | $1.87 | +5.34% |
| MHGVY | $19.65 | +2.50% | 10.1B | 26.15 | $0.75 | +2.84% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | +0.00% | 6.9B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +4.71% |
| SALRY | $11.05 | +3.51% | 6B | 32.83 | $0.34 | +3.28% |
| SALRF | $43.20 | -10.89% | 5.8B | 32.24 | $1.34 | +0.50% |
| KLKBY | $4.29 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 28.57 | $0.15 | +3.11% |
| PPOKF | $0.34 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 34.00 | $0.01 | +0.00% |
| CPOUF | $0.70 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 7.00 | $0.10 | +4.28% |
Stock Comparison
MNHVF vs WLMIF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while WLMIF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs WLMIY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while WLMIY trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs MHGVY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while MHGVY trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs KLKBF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to KLKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SALRY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SALRY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SALRF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SALRF trades at $43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs KLKBY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while KLKBY trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to KLKBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PPOKF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PPOKF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to PPOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CPOUF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CHPFF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to CHPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs ACOPY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while ACOPY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to ACOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs IDBHF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while IDBHF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs BKFKF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while BKFKF trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 71.82. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GARPF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GARPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs UPBMF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs KNKZF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while KNKZF trades at $65.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to KNKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs ASTVF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while ASTVF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to ASTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SLCJY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SLCJY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs DNDPF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to DNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GRCLF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GRCLF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to GRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CTTQF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to CTTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs MRVSY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 860.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while MRVSY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GRGSF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 774.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GRGSF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs AAGRY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 769.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while AAGRY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs EDESY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 750.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while EDESY trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PTABF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 692.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PTABF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs AAYYY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while AAYYY trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is -1031.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PPLFF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs MHPSY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 566.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while MHPSY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SISAF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 562.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to SISAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs ASAGF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 554.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while ASAGF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PPLFY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 484.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PPLFY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs ORENF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 474.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while ORENF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to ORENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs AEPLF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while AEPLF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs BRCPF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to BRCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SLMCF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to SLMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SLCJF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SARDF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SARDF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SARDY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SARDY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs ALFDF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs UVPOF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs DDEJF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while DDEJF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs STNT Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while STNT trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs DNDEF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs HLKKF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs NNUTU Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to NNUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs AASZF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while AASZF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to AASZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GARPY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GARPY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CTUNF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CLAD Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PRCF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CMGHY Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs OPTHF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while OPTHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PEASF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEASF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to PEASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SPZI Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SPZI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs HERB Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while HERB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CMGHF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CMGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GSFD Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GSFD trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to GSFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GCEH Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs RSSFF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to RSSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs MINE Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs PNDHF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to PNDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs STEV Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 967.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs IGPFF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 463K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs FLAF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLAF's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to FLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs GLGLF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs MSRM Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 329.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while MSRM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs HERF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 250K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while HERF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SHMP Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 247.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs TAER Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 233K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while TAER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CHYI Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 61.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CHYI trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to CHYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs OGAA Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to OGAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SUWN Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to SUWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs SIAF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to SIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs URYL Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs MSAH Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while MSAH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to MSAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs BIQIF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CFPI Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs URBF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to URBF's ROE of -56.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs KALRQ Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to KALRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs FFRMF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs BYIN Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BYIN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while BYIN trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to BYIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs OCESP Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs CAOX Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CAOX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while CAOX trades at $601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to CAOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.
MNHVF vs TSLLF Comparison
MNHVF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNHVF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TSLLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNHVF is priced at $18.35, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNHVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.47, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, MNHVF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MNHVF is more volatile compared to TSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNHVF.