Mastermind, Inc.
Mastermind, Inc. MMND Peers
See (MMND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMND | $0.03 | +0.16% | 1.1M | 3.21 | $0.01 | N/A |
| PUBGY | $27.26 | -0.18% | 27.3B | 14.58 | $1.87 | +2.98% |
| PGPEF | $99.00 | N/A | 24.8B | 13.27 | $7.46 | N/A |
| DNTUF | $28.55 | +47.85% | 7.4B | -5.63 | -$5.07 | +1.53% |
| WPPGF | $6.57 | N/A | 7.1B | 9.81 | $0.67 | +7.73% |
| DNTUY | $21.53 | +2.42% | 5.7B | -4.21 | -$5.12 | +3.01% |
| HKUOY | $14.66 | -2.40% | 5.4B | 35.76 | $0.41 | N/A |
| CYGIY | $4.24 | N/A | 4.3B | 28.27 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $7.90 | -2.23% | 4B | 27.24 | $0.29 | +1.42% |
| JCDXY | $7.93 | N/A | 3.4B | 11.49 | $0.69 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
MMND vs PUBGY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PUBGY trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs PGPEF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PGPEF trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and PGPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs DNTUF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while DNTUF trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and DNTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs WPPGF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while WPPGF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and WPPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs DNTUY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while DNTUY trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs HKUOY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs CYGIY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CYGIY trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CYGIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs CYAGF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CYAGF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CYAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs JCDXY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while JCDXY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and JCDXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs JCDXF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while JCDXF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and JCDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs HKUOF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and HKUOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs SOTDF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs FRRFF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while FRRFF trades at $65.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and FRRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs AIAPF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs NXFNF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 504.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while NXFNF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and NXFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs SPIDY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 487.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and SPIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs YUGVF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 410.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while YUGVF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 351.00. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and YUGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs MCCLF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and MCCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs TTTPF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs PTMEY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PTMEY trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and PTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs PROM Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and PROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs SCPPF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 223.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while SCPPF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs KLTI Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and KLTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs VCCLF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs PCOFF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs OPESF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and OPESF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs GTNLF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and GTNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs CAUUF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CAUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs CYPXF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CYPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -75.80. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs GMGZ Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while GMGZ trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and GMGZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs EZOO Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.71. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and EZOO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs NHLPF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while NHLPF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs ACHN Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs CNFN Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CNFN trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CNFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs IFUS Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while IFUS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs SNIPF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while SNIPF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs TGNT Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while TGNT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs AATV Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while AATV trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs SPTY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while SPTY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and SPTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs UCPA Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs INEOF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while INEOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and INEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs VYBE Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and VYBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs MMDDF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and MMDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs BYOC Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs CMGR Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CMGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs DBMM Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs FBOP Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs CEENF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CEENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs PVSP Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 982.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs LIGA Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 769.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and LIGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs DMSL Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs CMGO Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 438.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CMGO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs GOOLF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 340.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and GOOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs EPGC Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 340K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and EPGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs SNPW Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 327.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while SNPW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs WWIO Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 278K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs ATXMF Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 275.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and ATXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs NWCN Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 117.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs ACTL Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs ISML Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 72.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs NXMR Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and NXMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs TRBO Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and TRBO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs ITKH Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and ITKH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs PRKI Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and PRKI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs NBDR Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and NBDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs BWAV Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs PSYC Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 17.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and PSYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs RFII Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs GBXI Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and GBXI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs WGEE Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 9.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and WGEE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs CYGT Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and CYGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs GTRL Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and GTRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs BXNG Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and BXNG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs ADST Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs LOGX Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and LOGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs VPSN Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 6. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs ADTY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and ADTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs MYRY Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and MYRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MMND vs LTMP Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMND is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMND.
MMND vs ZULU Comparison
MMND plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMND stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMND is priced at $0.03, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMND currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMND's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMND and ZULU have similar daily volatility (0.00).