Malayan Banking Berhad
Malayan Banking Berhad (MLYBY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLYBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLYBY | $4.59 | +1.55% | 27.7B | 11.48 | $0.40 | +5.62% |
| CAIXY | $3.40 | +0.00% | 219B | 10.97 | $0.31 | +4.85% |
| CIHKY | $31.41 | +0.48% | 158.4B | 8.01 | $3.92 | +4.44% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 153.4B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.29% |
| UNCFF | $82.45 | +0.80% | 128.4B | 10.72 | $7.69 | +3.22% |
| UNCRY | $40.46 | +0.87% | 126B | 10.51 | $3.85 | +3.61% |
| DBSDF | $41.97 | +5.61% | 119.1B | 13.72 | $3.06 | +4.99% |
| IITSF | $6.66 | +2.46% | 118.3B | 11.09 | $0.60 | +5.58% |
| DBSDY | $159.54 | +1.16% | 113.3B | 13.02 | $12.25 | +3.85% |
| BNPQY | $49.04 | +1.91% | 110.2B | 8.90 | $5.49 | +5.37% |
Stock Comparison
MLYBY vs CAIXY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CAIXY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CAIXY's competition here
MLYBY vs CIHKY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 158.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CIHKY trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CIHKY's competition here
MLYBY vs CIHHF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CIHHF's competition here
MLYBY vs UNCFF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while UNCFF trades at $82.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check UNCFF's competition here
MLYBY vs UNCRY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while UNCRY trades at $40.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check UNCRY's competition here
MLYBY vs DBSDF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while DBSDF trades at $41.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check DBSDF's competition here
MLYBY vs IITSF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while IITSF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check IITSF's competition here
MLYBY vs DBSDY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while DBSDY trades at $159.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check DBSDY's competition here
MLYBY vs BNPQY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BNPQY trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BNPQY's competition here
MLYBY vs BNPQF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BNPQF trades at $96.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BNPQF's competition here
MLYBY vs KBCSY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while KBCSY trades at $61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check KBCSY's competition here
MLYBY vs SBKFF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SBKFF's competition here
MLYBY vs MZHOF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while MZHOF trades at $31.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check MZHOF's competition here
MLYBY vs EBKDY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while EBKDY trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check EBKDY's competition here
MLYBY vs BREJY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BREJY's competition here
MLYBY vs CIXPF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CIXPF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CIXPF's competition here
MLYBY vs AKSJF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check AKSJF's competition here
MLYBY vs LLOBF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while LLOBF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check LLOBF's competition here
MLYBY vs PSBKF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PSBKF's competition here
MLYBY vs PBCRY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PBCRY trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PBCRY's competition here
MLYBY vs LLDTF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while LLDTF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check LLDTF's competition here
MLYBY vs CHCJY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CHCJY trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CHCJY's competition here
MLYBY vs OVCHF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while OVCHF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check OVCHF's competition here
MLYBY vs CRARY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CRARY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CRARY's competition here
MLYBY vs OVCHY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while OVCHY trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check OVCHY's competition here
MLYBY vs CHBJF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CHBJF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CHBJF's competition here
MLYBY vs CRARF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CRARF trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CRARF's competition here
MLYBY vs PBCRF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PBCRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PBCRF's competition here
MLYBY vs NBNKF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while NBNKF trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check NBNKF's competition here
MLYBY vs NRDBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while NRDBY trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check NRDBY's competition here
MLYBY vs SCGLY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SCGLY trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SCGLY's competition here
MLYBY vs BNKHF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BNKHF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BNKHF's competition here
MLYBY vs BHKLY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BHKLY trades at $95.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BHKLY's competition here
MLYBY vs CRZBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CRZBY trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CRZBY's competition here
MLYBY vs CRZBF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CRZBF trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CRZBF's competition here
MLYBY vs UOVEF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while UOVEF trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check UOVEF's competition here
MLYBY vs SCGLF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SCGLF trades at $67.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SCGLF's competition here
MLYBY vs STNDF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check STNDF's competition here
MLYBY vs UOVEY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while UOVEY trades at $55.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check UOVEY's competition here
MLYBY vs JPPTY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while JPPTY trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check JPPTY's competition here
MLYBY vs CWESF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CWESF's competition here
MLYBY vs JPSTF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while JPSTF trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check JPSTF's competition here
MLYBY vs KBCSF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while KBCSF trades at $105.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check KBCSF's competition here
MLYBY vs DNBBF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while DNBBF trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check DNBBF's competition here
MLYBY vs DNBBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while DNBBY trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check DNBBY's competition here
MLYBY vs EBKOF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while EBKOF trades at $100.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check EBKOF's competition here
MLYBY vs BKRKY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKRKY trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKRKY's competition here
MLYBY vs SVKEF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SVKEF trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SVKEF's competition here
MLYBY vs DNKEY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while DNKEY trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check DNKEY's competition here
MLYBY vs DNSKF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while DNSKF trades at $44.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check DNSKF's competition here
MLYBY vs SWDBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SWDBY trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SWDBY's competition here
MLYBY vs SWDBF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SWDBF trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SWDBF's competition here
MLYBY vs JPPHY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while JPPHY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check JPPHY's competition here
MLYBY vs BKRKF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKRKF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKRKF's competition here
MLYBY vs PSZKF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PSZKF trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PSZKF's competition here
MLYBY vs BLMIF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BLMIF trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BLMIF's competition here
MLYBY vs CGMBF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CGMBF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CGMBF's competition here
MLYBY vs PPERY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PPERY trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PPERY's competition here
MLYBY vs HSNGY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while HSNGY trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check HSNGY's competition here
MLYBY vs MLYNF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while MLYNF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check MLYNF's competition here
MLYBY vs JPHLF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check JPHLF's competition here
MLYBY vs PPERF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PPERF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PPERF's competition here
MLYBY vs HSNGF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while HSNGF trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check HSNGF's competition here
MLYBY vs PSZKY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PSZKY trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PSZKY's competition here
MLYBY vs CEBCF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CEBCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CEBCF's competition here
MLYBY vs GBOOY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while GBOOY trades at $45.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check GBOOY's competition here
MLYBY vs GBOOF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while GBOOF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check GBOOF's competition here
MLYBY vs FCNCB Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while FCNCB trades at $1,697.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check FCNCB's competition here
MLYBY vs BKHYY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKHYY trades at $94.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKHYY's competition here
MLYBY vs SBGOF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SBGOF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SBGOF's competition here
MLYBY vs SGBLY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SGBLY trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SGBLY's competition here
MLYBY vs CKHGY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CKHGY trades at $104.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CKHGY's competition here
MLYBY vs BKHPF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKHPF trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKHPF's competition here
MLYBY vs CMAKY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CMAKY trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CMAKY's competition here
MLYBY vs RSNHF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while RSNHF trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check RSNHF's competition here
MLYBY vs BDORY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BDORY trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BDORY's competition here
MLYBY vs BPXXY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BPXXY trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BPXXY's competition here
MLYBY vs SUTNY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SUTNY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SUTNY's competition here
MLYBY vs MDIBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while MDIBY trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check MDIBY's competition here
MLYBY vs CMTDF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CMTDF trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CMTDF's competition here
MLYBY vs AIBGY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while AIBGY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check AIBGY's competition here
MLYBY vs ISNPY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while ISNPY trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check ISNPY's competition here
MLYBY vs CKHGF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CKHGF's competition here
MLYBY vs MDIBF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while MDIBF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check MDIBF's competition here
MLYBY vs CIMDF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while CIMDF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check CIMDF's competition here
MLYBY vs PBLOF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check PBLOF's competition here
MLYBY vs AIBRF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while AIBRF trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check AIBRF's competition here
MLYBY vs BNCZF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BNCZF's competition here
MLYBY vs BDOUF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BDOUF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BDOUF's competition here
MLYBY vs GPFOF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while GPFOF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check GPFOF's competition here
MLYBY vs BKPKF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKPKF trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKPKF's competition here
MLYBY vs BKRIY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKRIY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKRIY's competition here
MLYBY vs SKCBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check SKCBY's competition here
MLYBY vs GPFOY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check GPFOY's competition here
MLYBY vs BKRIF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKRIF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKRIF's competition here
MLYBY vs EGFEY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while EGFEY trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check EGFEY's competition here
MLYBY vs TKGBY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while TKGBY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check TKGBY's competition here
MLYBY vs EGFEF Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while EGFEF trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check EGFEF's competition here
MLYBY vs BKNIY Comparison August 2025
MLYBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLYBY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKNIY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MLYBY is priced at $4.59, while BKNIY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLYBY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BKNIY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, MLYBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKNIY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLYBY is less volatile compared to BKNIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLYBY.Check BKNIY's competition here