Foncière Vindi SA
Foncière Vindi SA MLVIN.PA Peers
See (MLVIN.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLVIN.PA | €4.60 | N/A | 91M | 65.71 | €0.07 | N/A |
| SHUR.BR | €35.15 | -0.71% | 3.5B | 8.55 | €4.11 | +2.83% |
| VGP.BR | €80.90 | -1.82% | 2.2B | 7.70 | €10.51 | +4.08% |
| ATRS.AS | €3.00 | N/A | 1.2B | -18.75 | -€0.16 | N/A |
| ORIA.PA | €172.00 | N/A | 415.2M | 14.01 | €12.28 | +2.09% |
| INCLU.BR | €16.80 | -0.59% | 124.6M | 6.41 | €2.62 | +4.88% |
| TEXF.BR | €33.40 | -1.18% | 122.5M | 16.45 | €2.03 | +5.26% |
| CROS.PA | €10.80 | N/A | 114.8M | 77.14 | €0.14 | +0.93% |
| SPEL.PA | €9.80 | N/A | 103.3M | 15.31 | €0.64 | N/A |
| MLPAP.PA | €1.05 | +5.00% | 65.5M | -7.00 | -€0.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLVIN.PA vs SHUR.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, SHUR.BR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while SHUR.BR trades at €35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas SHUR.BR's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHUR.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to SHUR.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs VGP.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, VGP.BR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while VGP.BR trades at €80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas VGP.BR's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VGP.BR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to VGP.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs ATRS.AS Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ATRS.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ATRS.AS trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ATRS.AS's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATRS.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to ATRS.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs ORIA.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ORIA.PA has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ORIA.PA trades at €172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ORIA.PA's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORIA.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ORIA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs INCLU.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, INCLU.BR has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while INCLU.BR trades at €16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas INCLU.BR's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INCLU.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to INCLU.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs TEXF.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, TEXF.BR has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while TEXF.BR trades at €33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas TEXF.BR's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEXF.BR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and TEXF.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs CROS.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, CROS.PA has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while CROS.PA trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas CROS.PA's P/E ratio is 77.14. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CROS.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and CROS.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs SPEL.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, SPEL.PA has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while SPEL.PA trades at €9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas SPEL.PA's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPEL.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and SPEL.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLPAP.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLPAP.PA has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLPAP.PA trades at €1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLPAP.PA's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLPAP.PA's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLPAP.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ARTE.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ARTE.PA has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ARTE.PA trades at €10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ARTE.PA's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARTE.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to ARTE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs MLMAQ.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLMAQ.PA has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLMAQ.PA trades at €8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLMAQ.PA's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLMAQ.PA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLMAQ.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs BEVER.AS Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, BEVER.AS has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while BEVER.AS trades at €2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas BEVER.AS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEVER.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and BEVER.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ACCB.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ACCB.BR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ACCB.BR trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ACCB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACCB.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to ACCB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs BEAB.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, BEAB.BR has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while BEAB.BR trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas BEAB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEAB.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and BEAB.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLWRC.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLWRC.PA has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLWRC.PA trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLWRC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLWRC.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLWRC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ALSAS.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ALSAS.PA has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ALSAS.PA trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ALSAS.PA's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALSAS.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ALSAS.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLPRI.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLPRI.PA has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLPRI.PA trades at €22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLPRI.PA's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLPRI.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLPRI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs EBPF.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, EBPF.PA has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while EBPF.PA trades at €193.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas EBPF.PA's P/E ratio is 4840.00. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EBPF.PA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and EBPF.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MCC.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MCC.BR has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MCC.BR trades at €480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MCC.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCC.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to MCC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs IMMOU.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, IMMOU.BR has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while IMMOU.BR trades at €36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas IMMOU.BR's P/E ratio is -144.00. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IMMOU.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to IMMOU.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs DIEG.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, DIEG.BR has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while DIEG.BR trades at €119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas DIEG.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DIEG.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and DIEG.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs FIPP.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, FIPP.PA has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while FIPP.PA trades at €0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas FIPP.PA's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FIPP.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to FIPP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs ZEN.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ZEN.BR has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ZEN.BR trades at €212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ZEN.BR's P/E ratio is 1247.06. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZEN.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ZEN.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLVIE.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLVIE.PA has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLVIE.PA trades at €115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLVIE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLVIE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to MLVIE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs EFI.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, EFI.PA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while EFI.PA trades at €0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas EFI.PA's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EFI.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and EFI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs BERR.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, BERR.PA has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while BERR.PA trades at €11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas BERR.PA's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BERR.PA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to BERR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs SNG.LS Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, SNG.LS has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while SNG.LS trades at €1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas SNG.LS's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNG.LS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and SNG.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs TAYN.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, TAYN.PA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while TAYN.PA trades at €1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas TAYN.PA's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAYN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and TAYN.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ALEUA.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ALEUA.PA has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ALEUA.PA trades at €1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ALEUA.PA's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALEUA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ALEUA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs COUR.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, COUR.PA has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while COUR.PA trades at €123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas COUR.PA's P/E ratio is -25.79. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COUR.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and COUR.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ALREA.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ALREA.PA has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ALREA.PA trades at €1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ALREA.PA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALREA.PA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALREA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs ALNOR.LS Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ALNOR.LS has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ALNOR.LS trades at €0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ALNOR.LS's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALNOR.LS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALNOR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs BAS.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, BAS.BR has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while BAS.BR trades at €27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas BAS.BR's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BAS.BR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to BAS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs SOFT.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, SOFT.BR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while SOFT.BR trades at €0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas SOFT.BR's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOFT.BR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and SOFT.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLNEU.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLNEU.BR has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLNEU.BR trades at €7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLNEU.BR's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLNEU.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLNEU.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs CARP.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, CARP.PA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while CARP.PA trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas CARP.PA's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CARP.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to CARP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs EURS.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, EURS.PA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while EURS.PA trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas EURS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EURS.PA's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and EURS.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLIPP.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLIPP.PA has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLIPP.PA trades at €45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLIPP.PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLIPP.PA's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLIPP.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ANT.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ANT.BR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ANT.BR trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ANT.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANT.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ANT.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLALV.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLALV.PA has a market cap of 894.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLALV.PA trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLALV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLALV.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLALV.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs MLFTI.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, MLFTI.PA has a market cap of 848K. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while MLFTI.PA trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas MLFTI.PA's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLFTI.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and MLFTI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs CFI.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, CFI.PA has a market cap of 426.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while CFI.PA trades at €0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas CFI.PA's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFI.PA's ROE of -7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and CFI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs DISL.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, DISL.BR has a market cap of 250K. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while DISL.BR trades at €200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas DISL.BR's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DISL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to DISL.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs ALIMO.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ALIMO.PA has a market cap of 198.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ALIMO.PA trades at €0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ALIMO.PA's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALIMO.PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ALIMO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs ALADO.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ALADO.PA has a market cap of 74.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ALADO.PA trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ALADO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALADO.PA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALADO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLVIN.PA.
MLVIN.PA vs ML350.PA Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, ML350.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while ML350.PA trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas ML350.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ML350.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and ML350.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MLVIN.PA vs GENK.BR Comparison
MLVIN.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLVIN.PA stands at 91M. In comparison, GENK.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLVIN.PA is priced at €4.60, while GENK.BR trades at €8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLVIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 65.71, whereas GENK.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLVIN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GENK.BR's ROE of -18.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MLVIN.PA and GENK.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).