Les Toques Blanches du Monde SA

MLTBM.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLTBM.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EAT.MC has a market cap of 821M. Regarding current trading prices, MLTBM.PA is priced at €3.04, while EAT.MC trades at €3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLTBM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.61, whereas EAT.MC's P/E ratio is 94.88. In terms of profitability, MLTBM.PA's ROE is -1.43%, compared to EAT.MC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLTBM.PA is less volatile compared to EAT.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLTBM.PA.

MLTBM.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLTBM.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ELIOR.PA has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLTBM.PA is priced at €3.04, while ELIOR.PA trades at €2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLTBM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.61, whereas ELIOR.PA's P/E ratio is 256.00. In terms of profitability, MLTBM.PA's ROE is -1.43%, compared to ELIOR.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLTBM.PA is less volatile compared to ELIOR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLTBM.PA.

MLTBM.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLTBM.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IBS.LS has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLTBM.PA is priced at €3.04, while IBS.LS trades at €9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLTBM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.61, whereas IBS.LS's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, MLTBM.PA's ROE is -1.43%, compared to IBS.LS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLTBM.PA is less volatile compared to IBS.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLTBM.PA.

MLTBM.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLTBM.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALDBL.PA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLTBM.PA is priced at €3.04, while ALDBL.PA trades at €3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLTBM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.61, whereas ALDBL.PA's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, MLTBM.PA's ROE is -1.43%, compared to ALDBL.PA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MLTBM.PA is less volatile compared to ALDBL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLTBM.PA.

MLTBM.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLTBM.PA stands at 0. In comparison, FLO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLTBM.PA is priced at €3.04, while FLO.PA trades at €21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLTBM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.61, whereas FLO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLTBM.PA's ROE is -1.43%, compared to FLO.PA's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLTBM.PA and FLO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).