Sumo Resources Plc

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, XVALO.MC has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while XVALO.MC trades at €8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XVALO.MC's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to XVALO.MC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to XVALO.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, ERA.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while ERA.PA trades at €51.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERA.PA's P/E ratio is 103.60. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ERA.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to ERA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, AMG.AS has a market cap of 605M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while AMG.AS trades at €18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMG.AS's P/E ratio is -56.82. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AMG.AS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to AMG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, KMR.IR has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while KMR.IR trades at €4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMR.IR's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KMR.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to KMR.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, RX.PA has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while RX.PA trades at €1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RX.PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RX.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to RX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, MLZAM.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while MLZAM.PA trades at €1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLZAM.PA's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MLZAM.PA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to MLZAM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, NYR.BR has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while NYR.BR trades at €0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYR.BR's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NYR.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to NYR.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, ORQ1.IR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while ORQ1.IR trades at €0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORQ1.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ORQ1.IR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to ORQ1.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.

MLSUM.PA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSUM.PA stands at 102K. In comparison, 8GW.IR has a market cap of 52.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MLSUM.PA is priced at €0.00, while 8GW.IR trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSUM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8GW.IR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MLSUM.PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to 8GW.IR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSUM.PA is less volatile compared to 8GW.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSUM.PA.