Melrose Industries PLC
Melrose Industries PLC (MLSPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLSPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLSPF | $7.01 | -2.07% | 9B | -141.62 | -$0.05 | +1.09% |
| SIEGY | $134.16 | +0.60% | 210.2B | 23.26 | $5.77 | +1.49% |
| SMAWF | $265.55 | -1.03% | 208.4B | 23.01 | $11.54 | +2.05% |
| SBGSF | $282.25 | -3.01% | 160.6B | 30.86 | $9.25 | +1.02% |
| SBGSY | $55.71 | -0.61% | 157B | 30.30 | $1.84 | +1.50% |
| RCIT | $2,218.54 | +55463400.00% | 138.1B | -221854.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $114.93 | +0.76% | 91.3B | 459.08 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $111.63 | -2.93% | 88.8B | 465.14 | $0.24 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $5.77 | +7.25% | 84.9B | 26.23 | $0.22 | +1.41% |
| MHVYF | $24.60 | +0.88% | 83.9B | 51.02 | $0.49 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
MLSPF vs SIEGY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 210.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SIEGY trades at $134.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SIEGY's competition here
MLSPF vs SMAWF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 208.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMAWF trades at $265.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMAWF's competition here
MLSPF vs SBGSF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SBGSF trades at $282.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SBGSF's competition here
MLSPF vs SBGSY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SBGSY trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SBGSY's competition here
MLSPF vs RCIT Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while RCIT trades at $2,218.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -221854.00. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check RCIT's competition here
MLSPF vs SMNEY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMNEY trades at $114.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 459.08. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMNEY's competition here
MLSPF vs SMEGF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMEGF trades at $111.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 465.14. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMEGF's competition here
MLSPF vs WRTBY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WRTBY trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WRTBY's competition here
MLSPF vs MHVYF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while MHVYF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check MHVYF's competition here
MLSPF vs ATLPF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ATLPF trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ATLPF's competition here
MLSPF vs ATLFF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ATLFF trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ATLFF's competition here
MLSPF vs ATLKY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ATLKY trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ATLKY's competition here
MLSPF vs ATLCY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ATLCY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ATLCY's competition here
MLSPF vs KNYJY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KNYJY trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KNYJY's competition here
MLSPF vs SHLAF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SHLAF trades at $369.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SHLAF's competition here
MLSPF vs SHLRF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SHLRF trades at $358.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SHLRF's competition here
MLSPF vs SDVKY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SDVKY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SDVKY's competition here
MLSPF vs KNYJF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KNYJF trades at $61.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KNYJF's competition here
MLSPF vs SDVKF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SDVKF trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SDVKF's competition here
MLSPF vs FANUY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FANUY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FANUY's competition here
MLSPF vs FANUF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FANUF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FANUF's competition here
MLSPF vs WEGZY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WEGZY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WEGZY's competition here
MLSPF vs SMECF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMECF trades at $366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMECF's competition here
MLSPF vs SMCAY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMCAY trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMCAY's competition here
MLSPF vs NNDNF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while NNDNF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check NNDNF's competition here
MLSPF vs NJDCY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while NJDCY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check NJDCY's competition here
MLSPF vs VWDRY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while VWDRY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check VWDRY's competition here
MLSPF vs VWSYF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while VWSYF trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check VWSYF's competition here
MLSPF vs WEICF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WEICF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WEICF's competition here
MLSPF vs ALFVY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ALFVY trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ALFVY's competition here
MLSPF vs IHICY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while IHICY trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check IHICY's competition here
MLSPF vs ALFVF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ALFVF's competition here
MLSPF vs IHICF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while IHICF trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check IHICF's competition here
MLSPF vs WEICY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WEICY's competition here
MLSPF vs WRTBF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WRTBF trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WRTBF's competition here
MLSPF vs SIELF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SIELF's competition here
MLSPF vs GCTAF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check GCTAF's competition here
MLSPF vs GCTAY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check GCTAY's competition here
MLSPF vs KWHIY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KWHIY trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KWHIY's competition here
MLSPF vs KWHIF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KWHIF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KWHIF's competition here
MLSPF vs VTTGF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while VTTGF trades at $378.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check VTTGF's competition here
MLSPF vs VACNY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while VACNY trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check VACNY's competition here
MLSPF vs GEAGF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while GEAGF trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check GEAGF's competition here
MLSPF vs RATIY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check RATIY's competition here
MLSPF vs SMGZY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMGZY trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMGZY's competition here
MLSPF vs DAIUF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while DAIUF trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check DAIUF's competition here
MLSPF vs SMGKF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SMGKF trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SMGKF's competition here
MLSPF vs RTLLF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while RTLLF trades at $851.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check RTLLF's competition here
MLSPF vs DFKCY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while DFKCY trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check DFKCY's competition here
MLSPF vs WEIGF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WEIGF trades at $36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WEIGF's competition here
MLSPF vs WEGRY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while WEGRY trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check WEGRY's competition here
MLSPF vs JPSWY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while JPSWY trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check JPSWY's competition here
MLSPF vs EBCOY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while EBCOY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check EBCOY's competition here
MLSPF vs TBABF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check TBABF's competition here
MLSPF vs IMIAF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while IMIAF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check IMIAF's competition here
MLSPF vs VOYJF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while VOYJF trades at $35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check VOYJF's competition here
MLSPF vs FCHRF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FCHRF trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FCHRF's competition here
MLSPF vs YOKEY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while YOKEY trades at $48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check YOKEY's competition here
MLSPF vs SPXSY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SPXSY trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SPXSY's competition here
MLSPF vs SPXSF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SPXSF trades at $82.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SPXSF's competition here
MLSPF vs VLMTY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check VLMTY's competition here
MLSPF vs SULZF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SULZF trades at $177.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SULZF's competition here
MLSPF vs EBCOF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check EBCOF's competition here
MLSPF vs XJNGF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while XJNGF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check XJNGF's competition here
MLSPF vs NRXXY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while NRXXY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 138.75. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check NRXXY's competition here
MLSPF vs NRDXF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while NRDXF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check NRDXF's competition here
MLSPF vs HAIIF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check HAIIF's competition here
MLSPF vs FLUIF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FLUIF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FLUIF's competition here
MLSPF vs BCHHF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check BCHHF's competition here
MLSPF vs HSHZY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while HSHZY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check HSHZY's competition here
MLSPF vs YOKEF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check YOKEF's competition here
MLSPF vs YMATF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check YMATF's competition here
MLSPF vs HSHIF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check HSHIF's competition here
MLSPF vs DNGFF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check DNGFF's competition here
MLSPF vs SFSLF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SFSLF's competition here
MLSPF vs KRNNF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KRNNF's competition here
MLSPF vs ATSAF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check ATSAF's competition here
MLSPF vs JGHAF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while JGHAF trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check JGHAF's competition here
MLSPF vs AALBF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while AALBF trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check AALBF's competition here
MLSPF vs NGKIF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while NGKIF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check NGKIF's competition here
MLSPF vs FLIDF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FLIDF trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FLIDF's competition here
MLSPF vs MRRLF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check MRRLF's competition here
MLSPF vs MICLF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check MICLF's competition here
MLSPF vs FLIDY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FLIDY's competition here
MLSPF vs FJTCY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while FJTCY trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check FJTCY's competition here
MLSPF vs CYJBF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check CYJBF's competition here
MLSPF vs RTOXF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while RTOXF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check RTOXF's competition here
MLSPF vs THKLY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while THKLY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check THKLY's competition here
MLSPF vs KUKAF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KUKAF's competition here
MLSPF vs AMDWF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check AMDWF's competition here
MLSPF vs KRDXF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while KRDXF trades at $386.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check KRDXF's competition here
MLSPF vs SOHVF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SOHVF's competition here
MLSPF vs THKLF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check THKLF's competition here
MLSPF vs SOHVY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SOHVY trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 535.00. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is less volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SOHVY's competition here
MLSPF vs MIURF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check MIURF's competition here
MLSPF vs JGHHY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check JGHHY's competition here
MLSPF vs SUZRY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to SUZRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check SUZRY's competition here
MLSPF vs MLSYY Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to MLSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check MLSYY's competition here
MLSPF vs IRRHF Comparison July 2025
MLSPF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLSPF stands at 9B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSPF is priced at $7.01, while IRRHF trades at $2,389.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLSPF currently has a P/E ratio of -141.62, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, MLSPF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSPF is more volatile compared to IRRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSPF.Check IRRHF's competition here