La Savonnerie De Nyons

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, OR.PA has a market cap of 199.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while OR.PA trades at €372.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas OR.PA's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OR.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to OR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, UNA.AS has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while UNA.AS trades at €51.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas UNA.AS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNA.AS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to UNA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DSFIR.AS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while DSFIR.AS trades at €89.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas DSFIR.AS's P/E ratio is 96.40. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSFIR.AS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to DSFIR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ITP.PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while ITP.PA trades at €34.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas ITP.PA's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITP.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to ITP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, BB.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while BB.PA trades at €53.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas BB.PA's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BB.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to BB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ONTEX.BR has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while ONTEX.BR trades at €6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas ONTEX.BR's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ONTEX.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to ONTEX.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, JBOG.PA has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while JBOG.PA trades at €4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas JBOG.PA's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBOG.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to JBOG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, PORF.AS has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while PORF.AS trades at €11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas PORF.AS's P/E ratio is -191.67. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PORF.AS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA and PORF.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, REAL.BR has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while REAL.BR trades at €14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas REAL.BR's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REAL.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA and REAL.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FAYE.PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while FAYE.PA trades at €16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas FAYE.PA's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAYE.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA and FAYE.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ALMAS.PA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while ALMAS.PA trades at €0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas ALMAS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALMAS.PA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to ALMAS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, MLGAL.PA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while MLGAL.PA trades at €1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas MLGAL.PA's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLGAL.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA and MLGAL.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLSDN.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLSDN.PA stands at 6.7M. In comparison, MLSCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLSDN.PA is priced at €29.80, while MLSCH.PA trades at €24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLSDN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.48, whereas MLSCH.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLSDN.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLSCH.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLSDN.PA is less volatile compared to MLSCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLSDN.PA.