Impulse Fitness Solutions S.A
Impulse Fitness Solutions S.A (MLIFS.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLIFS.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLIFS.PA | €7.00 | +0.00% | 56.2M | -700.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| BFIT.AS | €29.80 | +1.22% | 1.9B | 135.45 | €0.22 | N/A |
| CDA.PA | €24.40 | +3.39% | 1.2B | 11.67 | €2.09 | +4.51% |
| BEN.PA | €6.96 | +3.19% | 559.2M | -25.76 | -€0.27 | +3.16% |
| OLG.PA | €2.08 | -2.35% | 361.7M | -4.24 | -€0.49 | N/A |
| MLCMB.PA | €250.00 | -6.02% | 225.1M | 11.63 | €21.49 | +3.40% |
| ALRFG.PA | €4.42 | -1.78% | 120.6M | 22.10 | €0.20 | +2.04% |
| ALPDX.PA | €11.80 | +0.00% | 105.9M | 17.88 | €0.66 | +5.59% |
| SMAR.BR | €26.40 | +0.00% | 91.8M | 19.13 | €1.38 | N/A |
| ABEO.PA | €8.10 | +0.50% | 67M | 7.79 | €1.04 | +4.07% |
Stock Comparison
MLIFS.PA vs BFIT.AS Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, BFIT.AS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while BFIT.AS trades at €29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas BFIT.AS's P/E ratio is 135.45. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BFIT.AS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to BFIT.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check BFIT.AS's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs CDA.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, CDA.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while CDA.PA trades at €24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas CDA.PA's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to CDA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check CDA.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs BEN.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, BEN.PA has a market cap of 559.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while BEN.PA trades at €6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas BEN.PA's P/E ratio is -25.76. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BEN.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to BEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check BEN.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs OLG.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, OLG.PA has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while OLG.PA trades at €2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas OLG.PA's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OLG.PA's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to OLG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check OLG.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs MLCMB.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, MLCMB.PA has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while MLCMB.PA trades at €250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas MLCMB.PA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLCMB.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to MLCMB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check MLCMB.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ALRFG.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ALRFG.PA has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ALRFG.PA trades at €4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ALRFG.PA's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALRFG.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA and ALRFG.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALRFG.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ALPDX.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ALPDX.PA has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ALPDX.PA trades at €11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ALPDX.PA's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALPDX.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to ALPDX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check ALPDX.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs SMAR.BR Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, SMAR.BR has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while SMAR.BR trades at €26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas SMAR.BR's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMAR.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to SMAR.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check SMAR.BR's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ABEO.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ABEO.PA has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ABEO.PA trades at €8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ABEO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABEO.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to ABEO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check ABEO.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ALMND.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ALMND.PA has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ALMND.PA trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ALMND.PA's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALMND.PA's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to ALMND.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check ALMND.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ALLEX.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ALLEX.PA has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ALLEX.PA trades at €5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ALLEX.PA's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALLEX.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to ALLEX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check ALLEX.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs SNOW.AS Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, SNOW.AS has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while SNOW.AS trades at €10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas SNOW.AS's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SNOW.AS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to SNOW.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check SNOW.AS's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ALCYB.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ALCYB.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ALCYB.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ALCYB.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALCYB.PA's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to ALCYB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check ALCYB.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs CYBBT.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, CYBBT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while CYBBT.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas CYBBT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CYBBT.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA and CYBBT.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBBT.PA's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs ACCEL.AS Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, ACCEL.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while ACCEL.AS trades at €57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas ACCEL.AS's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ACCEL.AS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA is less volatile compared to ACCEL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFS.PA.Check ACCEL.AS's competition here
MLIFS.PA vs GREV.PA Comparison April 2026
MLIFS.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFS.PA stands at 56.2M. In comparison, GREV.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFS.PA is priced at €7.00, while GREV.PA trades at €66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -700.00, whereas GREV.PA's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, MLIFS.PA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GREV.PA's ROE of -49.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFS.PA and GREV.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GREV.PA's competition here