Infoclip S.A.
Infoclip S.A. (MLIFC.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLIFC.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLIFC.PA | €2.00 | +0.00% | 1.2M | 3.23 | €0.62 | N/A |
ADYEN.AS | €1,559.20 | +1.09% | 49.1B | 52.66 | €29.61 | N/A |
EXN.PA | €18.96 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 43.09 | €0.44 | +27.90% |
OVH.PA | €10.95 | +1.96% | 1.7B | 136.88 | €0.08 | N/A |
WLN.PA | €3.74 | +2.63% | 1.1B | -3.57 | -€1.05 | N/A |
ITE.PA | €9.52 | +5.78% | 766.7M | 52.89 | €0.18 | +2.10% |
ALLIX.PA | €23.95 | +0.42% | 157.8M | -35.75 | -€0.67 | N/A |
ALHYP.PA | €9.80 | -5.77% | 61.9M | 8.38 | €1.17 | N/A |
MLMFI.PA | €12.00 | N/A | 27.8M | -55.30 | -€0.22 | N/A |
VMX.PA | €0.27 | -3.58% | 23.4M | -2.69 | -€0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLIFC.PA vs ADYEN.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADYEN.AS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ADYEN.AS trades at €1,559.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ADYEN.AS's P/E ratio is 52.66. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADYEN.AS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ADYEN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ADYEN.AS's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs EXN.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EXN.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while EXN.PA trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas EXN.PA's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EXN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA and EXN.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXN.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs OVH.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OVH.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while OVH.PA trades at €10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas OVH.PA's P/E ratio is 136.88. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OVH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to OVH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check OVH.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs WLN.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WLN.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while WLN.PA trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WLN.PA's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WLN.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to WLN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check WLN.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs ITE.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ITE.PA has a market cap of 766.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ITE.PA trades at €9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ITE.PA's P/E ratio is 52.89. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ITE.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ITE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ITE.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs ALLIX.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALLIX.PA has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ALLIX.PA trades at €23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALLIX.PA's P/E ratio is -35.75. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALLIX.PA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ALLIX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ALLIX.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs ALHYP.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALHYP.PA has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ALHYP.PA trades at €9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALHYP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALHYP.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ALHYP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ALHYP.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs MLMFI.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MLMFI.PA has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while MLMFI.PA trades at €12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MLMFI.PA's P/E ratio is -55.30. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MLMFI.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA and MLMFI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLMFI.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs VMX.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VMX.PA has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while VMX.PA trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas VMX.PA's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VMX.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to VMX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check VMX.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs KEYW.BR Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KEYW.BR has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while KEYW.BR trades at €0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KEYW.BR's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KEYW.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to KEYW.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check KEYW.BR's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs EAS2P.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EAS2P.AS has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while EAS2P.AS trades at €0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas EAS2P.AS's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EAS2P.AS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to EAS2P.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check EAS2P.AS's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs ALMUN.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALMUN.PA has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ALMUN.PA trades at €0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALMUN.PA's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALMUN.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ALMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ALMUN.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs ALKLK.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALKLK.PA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ALKLK.PA trades at €0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALKLK.PA's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALKLK.PA's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ALKLK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ALKLK.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs ALGEC.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALGEC.PA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while ALGEC.PA trades at €3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALGEC.PA's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALGEC.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to ALGEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check ALGEC.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs MLCEC.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MLCEC.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while MLCEC.PA trades at €0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MLCEC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MLCEC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA and MLCEC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLCEC.PA's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs MSF.BR Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MSF.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while MSF.BR trades at €319.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MSF.BR's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MSF.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA and MSF.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSF.BR's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs GLOG.BR Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GLOG.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while GLOG.BR trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GLOG.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GLOG.BR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA is less volatile compared to GLOG.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIFC.PA.Check GLOG.BR's competition here
MLIFC.PA vs MLFSG.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIFC.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIFC.PA stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MLFSG.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIFC.PA is priced at €2.00, while MLFSG.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIFC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MLFSG.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLIFC.PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MLFSG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIFC.PA and MLFSG.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLFSG.PA's competition here