IDS France SAS
IDS France SAS (MLIDS.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLIDS.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLIDS.PA | €0.49 | +0.00% | 3.9M | -2.89 | -€0.17 | N/A |
| DSY.PA | €29.86 | +1.88% | 39.2B | 35.04 | €0.85 | +0.87% |
| ALTTU.PA | €5.45 | +0.00% | 4.5B | -545.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| VU.PA | €238.80 | +0.08% | 4.2B | -88.09 | -€2.72 | +0.25% |
| ALESK.PA | €277.40 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 100.14 | €2.77 | N/A |
| LSS.PA | €26.05 | +11.32% | 980.8M | 32.04 | €0.81 | +1.54% |
| ESI.PA | €154.00 | -0.32% | 879.5M | -700.00 | -€0.22 | N/A |
| AXW.PA | €27.50 | +0.00% | 800.5M | 19.10 | €1.44 | N/A |
| TOM2.AS | €5.35 | +2.49% | 648.3M | -20.84 | -€0.25 | N/A |
| QDT.PA | €16.28 | +1.50% | 549.1M | 8.35 | €1.95 | +3.99% |
Stock Comparison
MLIDS.PA vs DSY.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DSY.PA has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while DSY.PA trades at €29.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas DSY.PA's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DSY.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to DSY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check DSY.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALTTU.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALTTU.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALTTU.PA trades at €5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALTTU.PA's P/E ratio is -545.00. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALTTU.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and ALTTU.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTTU.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs VU.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, VU.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while VU.PA trades at €238.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas VU.PA's P/E ratio is -88.09. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VU.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to VU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check VU.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALESK.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALESK.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALESK.PA trades at €277.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALESK.PA's P/E ratio is 100.14. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALESK.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALESK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALESK.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs LSS.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, LSS.PA has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while LSS.PA trades at €26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas LSS.PA's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LSS.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to LSS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check LSS.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ESI.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ESI.PA has a market cap of 879.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ESI.PA trades at €154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ESI.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ESI.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ESI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ESI.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs AXW.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, AXW.PA has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while AXW.PA trades at €27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas AXW.PA's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AXW.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to AXW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check AXW.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs TOM2.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, TOM2.AS has a market cap of 648.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while TOM2.AS trades at €5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas TOM2.AS's P/E ratio is -20.84. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TOM2.AS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to TOM2.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check TOM2.AS's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs QDT.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, QDT.PA has a market cap of 549.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while QDT.PA trades at €16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas QDT.PA's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to QDT.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to QDT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check QDT.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALTBG.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALTBG.PA has a market cap of 420.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALTBG.PA trades at €2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALTBG.PA's P/E ratio is 141.00. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALTBG.PA's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALTBG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALTBG.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs SWP.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SWP.PA has a market cap of 369.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while SWP.PA trades at €38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas SWP.PA's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SWP.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to SWP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check SWP.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs LIN.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, LIN.PA has a market cap of 356M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while LIN.PA trades at €71.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas LIN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LIN.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to LIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check LIN.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALBFR.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALBFR.PA has a market cap of 323.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALBFR.PA trades at €231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALBFR.PA's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALBFR.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALBFR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALBFR.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs CMCOM.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CMCOM.AS has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while CMCOM.AS trades at €5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas CMCOM.AS's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CMCOM.AS's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to CMCOM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check CMCOM.AS's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs MTRK.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MTRK.AS has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while MTRK.AS trades at €3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas MTRK.AS's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MTRK.AS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to MTRK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check MTRK.AS's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALVIV.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALVIV.PA has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALVIV.PA trades at €37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALVIV.PA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALVIV.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALVIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALVIV.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALSTW.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALSTW.PA has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALSTW.PA trades at €56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALSTW.PA's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALSTW.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALSTW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALSTW.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs CLA.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CLA.PA has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while CLA.PA trades at €2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas CLA.PA's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CLA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to CLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check CLA.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs UPG.BR Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UPG.BR has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while UPG.BR trades at €3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas UPG.BR's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to UPG.BR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to UPG.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check UPG.BR's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs HYSG.BR Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, HYSG.BR has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while HYSG.BR trades at €3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas HYSG.BR's P/E ratio is -35.80. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HYSG.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to HYSG.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check HYSG.BR's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALPRO.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALPRO.PA has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALPRO.PA trades at €11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALPRO.PA's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALPRO.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALPRO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALPRO.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs DLE.IR Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DLE.IR has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while DLE.IR trades at €0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas DLE.IR's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DLE.IR's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to DLE.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check DLE.IR's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALPHI.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALPHI.PA has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALPHI.PA trades at €2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALPHI.PA's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALPHI.PA's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and ALPHI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALPHI.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs TIE.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, TIE.AS has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while TIE.AS trades at €31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas TIE.AS's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TIE.AS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to TIE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check TIE.AS's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs COH.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, COH.PA has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while COH.PA trades at €8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas COH.PA's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to COH.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to COH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check COH.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALTTI.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALTTI.PA has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALTTI.PA trades at €2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALTTI.PA's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALTTI.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and ALTTI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTTI.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALWED.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALWED.PA has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALWED.PA trades at €30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALWED.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALWED.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and ALWED.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALWED.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALPRG.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALPRG.PA has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALPRG.PA trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALPRG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALPRG.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALPRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALPRG.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs MLMCA.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MLMCA.PA has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while MLMCA.PA trades at €7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas MLMCA.PA's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MLMCA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and MLMCA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLMCA.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs EXR.IR Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EXR.IR has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while EXR.IR trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas EXR.IR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EXR.IR's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and EXR.IR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXR.IR's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALVGO.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALVGO.PA has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALVGO.PA trades at €2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALVGO.PA's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALVGO.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALVGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALVGO.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs NEDSE.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NEDSE.AS has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while NEDSE.AS trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas NEDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NEDSE.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to NEDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check NEDSE.AS's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs PROAC.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PROAC.PA has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while PROAC.PA trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas PROAC.PA's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PROAC.PA's ROE of -28.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and PROAC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PROAC.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALNRG.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALNRG.PA has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALNRG.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALNRG.PA's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALNRG.PA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALNRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALNRG.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs GOJXN.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GOJXN.AS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while GOJXN.AS trades at €1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas GOJXN.AS's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GOJXN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to GOJXN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check GOJXN.AS's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs MLPAC.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MLPAC.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while MLPAC.PA trades at €8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas MLPAC.PA's P/E ratio is -26.77. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MLPAC.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and MLPAC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLPAC.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs EOS.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EOS.PA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while EOS.PA trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas EOS.PA's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EOS.PA's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to EOS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check EOS.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs MLTV.BR Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MLTV.BR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while MLTV.BR trades at €0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas MLTV.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MLTV.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to MLTV.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check MLTV.BR's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALSIM.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALSIM.PA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALSIM.PA trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALSIM.PA's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALSIM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and ALSIM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALSIM.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALIMR.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALIMR.PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALIMR.PA trades at €1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALIMR.PA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALIMR.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and ALIMR.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALIMR.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs MLDAM.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MLDAM.PA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while MLDAM.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas MLDAM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MLDAM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and MLDAM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLDAM.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ALNMR.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALNMR.PA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ALNMR.PA trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ALNMR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALNMR.PA's ROE of +5.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ALNMR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ALNMR.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs MLMGL.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MLMGL.PA has a market cap of 278.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while MLMGL.PA trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas MLMGL.PA's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MLMGL.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and MLMGL.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLMGL.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs PROL.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PROL.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while PROL.PA trades at €0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas PROL.PA's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PROL.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to PROL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check PROL.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs 6VR.IR Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, 6VR.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while 6VR.IR trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas 6VR.IR's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to 6VR.IR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA and 6VR.IR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 6VR.IR's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs IGE.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IGE.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while IGE.PA trades at €210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas IGE.PA's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IGE.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to IGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check IGE.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs CAS.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CAS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while CAS.PA trades at €7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas CAS.PA's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CAS.PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to CAS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check CAS.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs GENX.PA Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GENX.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while GENX.PA trades at €9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas GENX.PA's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GENX.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to GENX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check GENX.PA's competition here
MLIDS.PA vs ICT.AS Comparison July 2025
MLIDS.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLIDS.PA stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ICT.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLIDS.PA is priced at €0.49, while ICT.AS trades at €14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLIDS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.89, whereas ICT.AS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, MLIDS.PA's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ICT.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLIDS.PA is less volatile compared to ICT.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLIDS.PA.Check ICT.AS's competition here