H&K AG
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MLHK.PA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MLHK.PA
H&K AG (MLHK.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLHK.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLHK.PA | €33.60 | -2.89% | 1.2B | 35.00 | €0.96 | +0.18% |
| BOEI.BR | €224.00 | -8.20% | 135.1B | -29.87 | -€7.50 | N/A |
| AIR.PA | €165.14 | -1.64% | 130.3B | 24.98 | €6.61 | +1.21% |
| SAF.PA | €287.30 | -1.14% | 119.8B | 16.73 | €17.17 | +1.01% |
| HO.PA | €267.50 | +0.38% | 55B | 32.90 | €8.13 | +1.42% |
| AM.PA | €336.60 | +0.24% | 26.1B | 26.86 | €12.53 | +1.40% |
| CSG.AS | €24.94 | -0.24% | 24.9B | 40.89 | €0.61 | N/A |
| THEON.AS | €34.00 | +1.49% | 2.7B | 33.66 | €1.01 | +1.00% |
| FII.PA | €55.20 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 40.59 | €1.36 | +0.71% |
| EXA.PA | €133.00 | +1.53% | 2.3B | 782.35 | €0.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLHK.PA vs BOEI.BR Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BOEI.BR has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while BOEI.BR trades at €224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas BOEI.BR's P/E ratio is -29.87. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOEI.BR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to BOEI.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check BOEI.BR's competition here
MLHK.PA vs AIR.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIR.PA has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while AIR.PA trades at €165.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AIR.PA's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIR.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to AIR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check AIR.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs SAF.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAF.PA has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while SAF.PA trades at €287.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SAF.PA's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SAF.PA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to SAF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check SAF.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs HO.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HO.PA has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while HO.PA trades at €267.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas HO.PA's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HO.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to HO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check HO.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs AM.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AM.PA has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while AM.PA trades at €336.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AM.PA's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to AM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check AM.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs CSG.AS Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CSG.AS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while CSG.AS trades at €24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CSG.AS's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSG.AS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to CSG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check CSG.AS's competition here
MLHK.PA vs THEON.AS Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THEON.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while THEON.AS trades at €34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas THEON.AS's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to THEON.AS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to THEON.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check THEON.AS's competition here
MLHK.PA vs FII.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FII.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while FII.PA trades at €55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas FII.PA's P/E ratio is 40.59. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FII.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to FII.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check FII.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs EXA.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXA.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while EXA.PA trades at €133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas EXA.PA's P/E ratio is 782.35. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EXA.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to EXA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check EXA.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs FGA.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FGA.PA has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while FGA.PA trades at €9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas FGA.PA's P/E ratio is -46.29. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FGA.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to FGA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check FGA.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs SX.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SX.PA has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while SX.PA trades at €11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SX.PA's P/E ratio is 230.00. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SX.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to SX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check SX.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs LAT.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAT.PA has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while LAT.PA trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas LAT.PA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAT.PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to LAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check LAT.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs SOG.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOG.PA has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while SOG.PA trades at €19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SOG.PA's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SOG.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to SOG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check SOG.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs MLVER.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLVER.PA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while MLVER.PA trades at €3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas MLVER.PA's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLVER.PA's ROE of -12.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to MLVER.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check MLVER.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs ALDR.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALDR.PA has a market cap of 879.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while ALDR.PA trades at €1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ALDR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALDR.PA's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is less volatile compared to ALDR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check ALDR.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs MLTEA.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLTEA.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while MLTEA.PA trades at €324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas MLTEA.PA's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLTEA.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to MLTEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check MLTEA.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs GOE.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GOE.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while GOE.PA trades at €19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas GOE.PA's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GOE.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to GOE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check GOE.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs GECBT.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GECBT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while GECBT.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas GECBT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GECBT.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to GECBT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check GECBT.PA's competition here
MLHK.PA vs MLAIM.PA Comparison April 2026
MLHK.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHK.PA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLAIM.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHK.PA is priced at €33.60, while MLAIM.PA trades at €1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas MLAIM.PA's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, MLHK.PA's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLAIM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLHK.PA is more volatile compared to MLAIM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHK.PA.Check MLAIM.PA's competition here