Activium Group SAS

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ARTO.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while ARTO.PA trades at €9,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTO.PA's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARTO.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA and ARTO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ALTVO.PA has a market cap of 228.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while ALTVO.PA trades at €43.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTVO.PA's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALTVO.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA and ALTVO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, AL2SI.PA has a market cap of 198.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while AL2SI.PA trades at €8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AL2SI.PA's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AL2SI.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to AL2SI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ALMDG.PA has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while ALMDG.PA trades at €13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMDG.PA's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALMDG.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALMDG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, GUI.PA has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while GUI.PA trades at €4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUI.PA's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GUI.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to GUI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ALDRV.PA has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while ALDRV.PA trades at €0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALDRV.PA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALDRV.PA's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALDRV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, PWG.PA has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while PWG.PA trades at €0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWG.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to PWG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ALLOG.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while ALLOG.PA trades at €1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLOG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALLOG.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALLOG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, MLOCT.PA has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while MLOCT.PA trades at €0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLOCT.PA's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLOCT.PA's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA and MLOCT.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ALORD.PA has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while ALORD.PA trades at €0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALORD.PA's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALORD.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALORD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, MLTHO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while MLTHO.PA trades at €8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLTHO.PA's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLTHO.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to MLTHO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CIB.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while CIB.PA trades at €0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIB.PA's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIB.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to CIB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.

MLACT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLACT.PA stands at 3.6M. In comparison, 2CRSI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLACT.PA is priced at €1.44, while 2CRSI.PA trades at €2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2CRSI.PA's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, MLACT.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2CRSI.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLACT.PA is less volatile compared to 2CRSI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLACT.PA.