Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, EO.PA has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while EO.PA trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas EO.PA's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EO.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to EO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, FR.PA has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while FR.PA trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas FR.PA's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FR.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to FR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, FRVIA.PA has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while FRVIA.PA trades at $8.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas FRVIA.PA's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRVIA.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to FRVIA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, POM.PA has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while POM.PA trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas POM.PA's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POM.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is more volatile compared to POM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, BUR.PA has a market cap of 617.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while BUR.PA trades at $352.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas BUR.PA's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BUR.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to BUR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, AKW.PA has a market cap of 205.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while AKW.PA trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas AKW.PA's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKW.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to AKW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, KENDR.AS has a market cap of 175.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while KENDR.AS trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas KENDR.AS's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KENDR.AS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to KENDR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, ALATI.PA has a market cap of 61.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while ALATI.PA trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas ALATI.PA's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALATI.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to ALATI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, ALDEL.PA has a market cap of 54.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while ALDEL.PA trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas ALDEL.PA's P/E ratio is -420.00. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALDEL.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to ALDEL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, PVL.PA has a market cap of 28.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while PVL.PA trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas PVL.PA's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVL.PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to PVL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, MLMAZ.BR has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while MLMAZ.BR trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas MLMAZ.BR's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLMAZ.BR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is more volatile compared to MLMAZ.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 24.24B. In comparison, MLSTR.PA has a market cap of 5.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at $34.34, while MLSTR.PA trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas MLSTR.PA's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLSTR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to MLSTR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.