Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, EO.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while EO.PA trades at €21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas EO.PA's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EO.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to EO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FR.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while FR.PA trades at €8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FR.PA's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FR.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to FR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, POM.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while POM.PA trades at €10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas POM.PA's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POM.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to POM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FRVIA.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while FRVIA.PA trades at €7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FRVIA.PA's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRVIA.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to FRVIA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BUR.PA has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while BUR.PA trades at €373.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BUR.PA's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BUR.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to BUR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, AKW.PA has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while AKW.PA trades at €7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas AKW.PA's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKW.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA and AKW.PA have similar daily volatility (0.82).

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, KENDR.AS has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while KENDR.AS trades at €11.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KENDR.AS's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KENDR.AS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to KENDR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ALATI.PA has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while ALATI.PA trades at €3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ALATI.PA's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALATI.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to ALATI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ALDEL.PA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while ALDEL.PA trades at €21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ALDEL.PA's P/E ratio is -420.00. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALDEL.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to ALDEL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, PVL.PA has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while PVL.PA trades at €1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PVL.PA's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVL.PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to PVL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MLMAZ.BR has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while MLMAZ.BR trades at €2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MLMAZ.BR's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLMAZ.BR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is more volatile compared to MLMAZ.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MLSTR.PA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while MLSTR.PA trades at €8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MLSTR.PA's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLSTR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to MLSTR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.

ML.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ML.PA stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ATI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ML.PA is priced at €32.69, while ATI.PA trades at €4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ML.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ATI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ML.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATI.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ML.PA is less volatile compared to ATI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ML.PA.