MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien MKKGY Peers
See (MKKGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKKGY | $26.04 | +2.64% | 57.1B | 17.48 | $1.49 | +2.23% |
| MKGAF | $132.80 | +3.90% | 57.7B | 17.80 | $7.46 | +1.70% |
| HLNCF | $5.25 | +1.16% | 47.2B | 24.98 | $0.21 | +1.17% |
| TKPHF | $28.35 | +2.42% | 44.6B | 60.32 | $0.47 | +4.81% |
| IPSEY | $29.78 | +3.91% | 39.4B | 24.41 | $1.22 | +0.75% |
| SDZNY | $52.66 | -1.42% | 22.7B | -2633.00 | -$0.02 | +1.28% |
| TEVJF | $17.80 | N/A | 20.4B | -15.48 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| SGIOF | $17.63 | N/A | 15B | 12.77 | $1.38 | +2.36% |
| SGIOY | $8.75 | +1.27% | 14.9B | 12.68 | $0.69 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
MKKGY vs MKGAF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while MKGAF trades at $132.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLNCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HLNCF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TKPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TKPHF trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IPSEY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while IPSEY trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SDZNY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SDZNY trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2633.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TEVJF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TEVJF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESALY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGIOF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SGIOF trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGIOY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SGIOY trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IPSEF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOVF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while BIOVF trades at $27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESALF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ESALF trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SFOSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SFOSF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESAIY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ESAIY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HKMPY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HKMPY trades at $56.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HKMPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HKMPF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GZPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GZPHF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs WIBFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLBBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HLBBF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LVZPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLUBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HLUBF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ULIHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ULIHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs APNHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs INVVY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs APNHY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while APNHY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IZQVF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HYPMY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HYPMY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HMDCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DNPUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while DNPUF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SMDPY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SMDPY trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs THCBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CHSYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CHSYF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TSMRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TSMRF trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DMPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HTSUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HTSUF trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LJUIF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LBTSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LBTSF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 150.17. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ARSUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NPNKF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs YIHCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs MITPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KARBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EVOTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while EVOTF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NPPNY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while NPPNY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SHEZF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CHIZF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CHIZF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GTBIF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GTBIF trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KSPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while KSPHF trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SWGHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GNMLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GNMLF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KKPCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while KKPCF trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CASBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 985.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CASBF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SHPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LVTTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 904M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOGY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while BIOGY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NRXCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 846.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NRXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TWAPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ELTP Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 827.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ELTP trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -38.74. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CSWYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TRXPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TCNNF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 663M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TCNNF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SWDCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 655.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SWDCF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 68.33. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TRSSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CURLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 590.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CURLF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGFEF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 583.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while SGFEF trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PKBFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 545.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CCHWF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BOIRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while BOIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PEXXF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KHTRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while KHTRF trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 63.43. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AGYTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HUMDF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 404M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HUMDF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AIHLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while AIHLF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NIKA Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while NIKA trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BHCCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GLASF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GLASF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -54.78. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CPHRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 240.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CPHRF trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PLNHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AUSAF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, AUSAF has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while AUSAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas AUSAF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUSAF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to AUSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs VRNOF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while VRNOF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CRLBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 154M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CRLBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CBSTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CBSTF has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CBSTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CBSTF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBSTF's ROE of +10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CBSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PHCUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while PHCUF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is 519.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs COPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLTRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while HLTRF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LPCUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CNVCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NWPN Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while BIOYF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LOVFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LOVFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LRDSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GBLP Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GBLP has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GBLP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GBLP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CBWTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while CBWTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GRUSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GRUSF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs MEDXF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, MEDXF has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while MEDXF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas MEDXF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MEDXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MEDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DUTV Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, DUTV has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while DUTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas DUTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to DUTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ABSCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while ABSCF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EOFBY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to EOFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GDNSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 57.1B. In comparison, GDNSF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.04, while GDNSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.48, whereas GDNSF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDNSF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GDNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.