MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien MKKGY Peers
See (MKKGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKKGY | $26.26 | -0.30% | 56.9B | 17.99 | $1.46 | +2.17% |
| CHALF | $0.38 | +37999900.00% | 441.8B | -4.75 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| STMH | $0.10 | +99900.00% | 125.8B | -0.05 | -$1.89 | N/A |
| THCBF | $0.02 | +2350.00% | 58.1B | -2.45 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MKGAF | $128.36 | -4.25% | 55.8B | 17.63 | $7.28 | +1.72% |
| HLNCF | $5.49 | +1.01% | 49.5B | 26.12 | $0.21 | +1.98% |
| TKPHF | $28.03 | +6.58% | 44.1B | 60.93 | $0.46 | +4.75% |
| KHRNF | $0.01 | +79900.00% | 41.8B | -0.80 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| IPSEY | $29.50 | -2.03% | 39B | 24.38 | $1.21 | N/A |
| EVRRF | $0.07 | +2780.00% | 25.6B | -2.40 | -$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKKGY vs CHALF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CHALF has a market cap of 441.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CHALF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CHALF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHALF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CHALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs STMH Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while STMH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs THCBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while THCBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs MKGAF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while MKGAF trades at $128.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLNCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HLNCF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TKPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TKPHF trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 60.93. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KHRNF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, KHRNF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while KHRNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas KHRNF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHRNF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to KHRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IPSEY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while IPSEY trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EVRRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while EVRRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to EVRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SDZNY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SDZNY trades at $51.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2558.75. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SRUTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SRUTF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SRUTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SRUTF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRUTF's ROE of +18.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SRUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TEVJF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TEVJF trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESALY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGIOY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SGIOY trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGIOF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SGIOF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IPSEF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while IPSEF trades at $125.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOVF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while BIOVF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NOBDF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, NOBDF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while NOBDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NOBDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOBDF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to NOBDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SFOSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SFOSF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESAIY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ESAIY trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESALF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ESALF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GZPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while GZPHF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HKMPY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HKMPY trades at $56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HKMPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HKMPF trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLUBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HLUBF trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLBBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HLBBF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LVZPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while LVZPF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs APNHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while APNHF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs INVVY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs APNHY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while APNHY trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IZQVF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs WIBFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HYPMY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HYPMY trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ULIHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ULIHF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HMDCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HMDCF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SHEZF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SHEZF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HTSUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HTSUF trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DNPUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while DNPUF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CHSYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CHSYF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TSMRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TSMRF trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DMPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LBTSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while LBTSF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 162.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LJUIF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NPNKF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NPPNY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while NPPNY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EVOTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while EVOTF trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SMDPY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SMDPY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs MITPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs YIHCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KARBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ARSUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ARSUF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GTBIF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while GTBIF trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TWAPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TWAPF trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CHIZF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CHIZF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KSPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while KSPHF trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CASBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CASBF trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SWGHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GNMLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while GNMLF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SHPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SHPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KKPCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while KKPCF trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOGY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while BIOGY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NRXCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 839.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NRXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CSWYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CSWYF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TCNNF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 768.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TCNNF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AGYTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 757.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while AGYTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TRXPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ABSCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 682.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ABSCF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -67.65. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SWDCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SWDCF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NIKA Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 666.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while NIKA trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LVTTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 661.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CURLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 633.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CURLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BOIRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 622.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while BOIRF trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TRSSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ELTP Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while ELTP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -26.78. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs MNFSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, MNFSF has a market cap of 566M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while MNFSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MNFSF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNFSF's ROE of +16.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MNFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGFEF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 528.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while SGFEF trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CCHWF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AIHLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while AIHLF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PEXXF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KHTRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 423.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while KHTRF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LRDSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CNGGF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CNGGF has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CNGGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CNGGF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNGGF's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GLASF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 299.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while GLASF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BHCCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while BHCCF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PKBFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BHHKF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, BHHKF has a market cap of 288.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while BHHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BHHKF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHHKF's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BHHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PSIQ Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, PSIQ has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while PSIQ trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PSIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSIQ's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PSIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CPHRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CPHRF trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs VRNOF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while VRNOF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PLNHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CRLBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CRLBF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs WLDFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, WLDFF has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while WLDFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas WLDFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLDFF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to WLDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BKUH Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, BKUH has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while BKUH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BKUH's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKUH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BKUH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HUMDF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while HUMDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PHCUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while PHCUF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is 501.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs COPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs UPPR Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, UPPR has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while UPPR trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas UPPR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UPPR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to UPPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LPCUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CNVCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 56.9B. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $26.26, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.