MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien MKKGY Peers
See (MKKGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKKGY | $28.44 | +2.01% | 61.69B | 19.61 | $1.45 | +1.34% |
| MKGAF | $137.80 | -3.06% | 59.91B | 19.09 | $7.22 | +1.63% |
| HLNCF | $5.10 | -4.67% | 46.01B | 24.29 | $0.21 | +2.05% |
| TKPHF | $28.90 | +3.44% | 45.48B | 32.11 | $0.90 | +4.60% |
| IPSEY | $29.20 | +4.17% | 38.64B | 24.13 | $1.21 | +1.08% |
| SDZNY | $45.05 | +0.42% | 19.40B | -2252.50 | -$0.02 | +0.91% |
| TEVJF | $16.11 | -9.49% | 18.46B | -14.01 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.64B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| SGIOY | $8.49 | +2.41% | 14.44B | 12.48 | $0.68 | +0.94% |
| SGIOF | $15.20 | N/A | 12.93B | 10.94 | $1.39 | +2.74% |
Stock Comparison
MKKGY vs MKGAF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 59.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while MKGAF trades at $137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLNCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 46.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HLNCF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TKPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 45.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TKPHF trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IPSEY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 38.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while IPSEY trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SDZNY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 19.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SDZNY trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2252.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TEVJF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 18.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TEVJF trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESALY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGIOY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SGIOY trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGIOF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 12.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SGIOF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOVF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while BIOVF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IPSEF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while IPSEF trades at $125.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SFOSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SFOSF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESAIY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 7.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ESAIY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ESALF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 7.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ESALF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GZPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GZPHF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HKMPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HKMPF trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HKMPY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HKMPY trades at $53.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs APNHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while APNHF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs WIBFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LVZPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLBBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HLBBF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLUBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HLUBF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs APNHY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while APNHY trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs INVVY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs IZQVF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HMDCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DNPUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while DNPUF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ULIHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ULIHF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HYPMY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HYPMY trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HTSUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HTSUF trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs THCBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CHSYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CHSYF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TSMRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TSMRF trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs DMPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LJUIF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LBTSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LBTSF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 150.17. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NPNKF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while NPNKF trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SHEZF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CHIZF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CHIZF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SMDPY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SMDPY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AUSAF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, AUSAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while AUSAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas AUSAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUSAF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AUSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NPPNY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while NPPNY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KARBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs YIHCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EVOTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while EVOTF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ARSUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ARSUF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GTBIF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GTBIF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SWGHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOGY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while BIOGY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GNMLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GNMLF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NIKA Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while NIKA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KKPCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while KKPCF trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KSPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 994.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while KSPHF trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CASBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 984.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CASBF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LVTTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 880.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EVRRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 873.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to EVRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TCNNF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 857.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TCNNF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs NRXCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 829.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to NRXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TWAPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CSWYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 815.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CSWYF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TRXPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SWDCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 679.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SWDCF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CURLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 653.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CURLF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs TRSSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SGFEF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 544.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SGFEF trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CCHWF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AIHLF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 507.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while AIHLF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BOIRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 494.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while BOIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PEXXF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ELTP Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 459.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ELTP trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs SHPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 455.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while SHPHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs MITPF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 451.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while MITPF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs KHTRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 443.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while KHTRF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 148.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AGYTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GLASF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 314.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GLASF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PKBFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 288.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BHCCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 271.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs VRNOF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 259.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while VRNOF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CRLBF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 240.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CRLBF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CPHRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 237.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CPHRF trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PLNHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HUMDF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 147.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HUMDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs COPHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PHCUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 117.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while PHCUF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is -432.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LPCUF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CNVCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GRUSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 107.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GRUSF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs HLTRF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 102.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while HLTRF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs ABSCF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 92.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while ABSCF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs PLNH Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 88.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while PLNH trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs BIOYF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 88.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while BIOYF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LOVFF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 84.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LOVFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GBLP Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GBLP has a market cap of 83.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GBLP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GBLP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to GBLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs LRDSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 82.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs CBWTF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 80.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while CBWTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs EOFBY Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to EOFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs AAWH Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 70.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while AAWH trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs JUSHF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 67.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while JUSHF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.
MKKGY vs GDNSF Comparison
MKKGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKKGY stands at 61.69B. In comparison, GDNSF has a market cap of 61.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MKKGY is priced at $28.44, while GDNSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKKGY currently has a P/E ratio of 19.61, whereas GDNSF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, MKKGY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDNSF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKKGY is more volatile compared to GDNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKKGY.