MCNB Banks, Inc.
MCNB Banks, Inc. (MKIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKIN | $13.75 | +0.00% | 14.8M | 14.18 | $0.97 | N/A |
| CAIXY | $3.15 | +1.61% | 202.2B | 10.14 | $0.31 | +5.30% |
| CIHKY | $31.89 | -1.33% | 155.6B | 8.14 | $3.92 | +3.71% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 154.9B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.29% |
| UNCFF | $73.32 | -2.28% | 115.1B | 10.39 | $7.11 | +3.59% |
| UNCRY | $36.13 | -1.66% | 112.5B | 10.35 | $3.49 | +2.39% |
| DBSDF | $38.46 | +6.83% | 108.8B | 12.57 | $3.06 | +4.46% |
| IITSF | $5.90 | -3.20% | 104.9B | 9.67 | $0.61 | +6.29% |
| DBSDY | $147.55 | +0.06% | 104.6B | 12.07 | $12.19 | +3.74% |
| BNPQF | $91.63 | +1.16% | 102.4B | 8.26 | $11.10 | +5.88% |
Stock Comparison
MKIN vs CAIXY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 202.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CAIXY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CAIXY's competition here
MKIN vs CIHKY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CIHKY trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CIHKY's competition here
MKIN vs CIHHF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 154.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and CIHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIHHF's competition here
MKIN vs UNCFF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while UNCFF trades at $73.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check UNCFF's competition here
MKIN vs UNCRY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while UNCRY trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check UNCRY's competition here
MKIN vs DBSDF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while DBSDF trades at $38.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check DBSDF's competition here
MKIN vs IITSF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while IITSF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and IITSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IITSF's competition here
MKIN vs DBSDY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while DBSDY trades at $147.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check DBSDY's competition here
MKIN vs BNPQF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BNPQF trades at $91.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BNPQF's competition here
MKIN vs BNPQY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BNPQY trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BNPQY's competition here
MKIN vs SBKFF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and SBKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBKFF's competition here
MKIN vs KBCSY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while KBCSY trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check KBCSY's competition here
MKIN vs BREJY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and BREJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BREJY's competition here
MKIN vs MZHOF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while MZHOF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check MZHOF's competition here
MKIN vs EBKDY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while EBKDY trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check EBKDY's competition here
MKIN vs AKSJF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKSJF's competition here
MKIN vs OVCHF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while OVCHF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and OVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVCHF's competition here
MKIN vs CIXPF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CIXPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CIXPF's competition here
MKIN vs CHBJF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CHBJF's competition here
MKIN vs PBCRY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PBCRY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check PBCRY's competition here
MKIN vs LLOBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while LLOBF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and LLOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLOBF's competition here
MKIN vs PSBKF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check PSBKF's competition here
MKIN vs CHCJY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CHCJY trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and CHCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCJY's competition here
MKIN vs LLDTF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while LLDTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and LLDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLDTF's competition here
MKIN vs OVCHY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while OVCHY trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check OVCHY's competition here
MKIN vs PBCRF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PBCRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and PBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBCRF's competition here
MKIN vs CRARY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CRARY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CRARY's competition here
MKIN vs CRARF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CRARF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CRARF's competition here
MKIN vs NBNKF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while NBNKF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and NBNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBNKF's competition here
MKIN vs NRDBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while NRDBY trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check NRDBY's competition here
MKIN vs SCGLY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SCGLY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check SCGLY's competition here
MKIN vs BNKHF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BNKHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and BNKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNKHF's competition here
MKIN vs UOVEF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while UOVEF trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check UOVEF's competition here
MKIN vs BHKLY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BHKLY trades at $89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BHKLY's competition here
MKIN vs UOVEY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while UOVEY trades at $56.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check UOVEY's competition here
MKIN vs STNDF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STNDF's competition here
MKIN vs JPSTF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while JPSTF trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check JPSTF's competition here
MKIN vs SCGLF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SCGLF trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCGLF's competition here
MKIN vs CRZBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CRZBY trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CRZBY's competition here
MKIN vs KBCSF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while KBCSF trades at $105.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBCSF's competition here
MKIN vs CWESF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CWESF's competition here
MKIN vs DNBBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while DNBBF trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check DNBBF's competition here
MKIN vs CRZBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CRZBF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and CRZBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRZBF's competition here
MKIN vs DNBBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while DNBBY trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check DNBBY's competition here
MKIN vs SVKEF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SVKEF trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and SVKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVKEF's competition here
MKIN vs EBKOF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while EBKOF trades at $92.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check EBKOF's competition here
MKIN vs CEBCF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CEBCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CEBCF's competition here
MKIN vs BKRKF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BKRKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and BKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKRKF's competition here
MKIN vs BKRKY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BKRKY trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BKRKY's competition here
MKIN vs JPPTY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check JPPTY's competition here
MKIN vs DNKEY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while DNKEY trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check DNKEY's competition here
MKIN vs SWDBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SWDBF trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check SWDBF's competition here
MKIN vs CMAKY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CMAKY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and CMAKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMAKY's competition here
MKIN vs SWDBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SWDBY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check SWDBY's competition here
MKIN vs MLYNF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check MLYNF's competition here
MKIN vs PSZKF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PSZKF trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSZKF's competition here
MKIN vs HSNGF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while HSNGF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSNGF's competition here
MKIN vs BLMIF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BLMIF trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BLMIF's competition here
MKIN vs PSZKY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PSZKY trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check PSZKY's competition here
MKIN vs DNSKF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check DNSKF's competition here
MKIN vs JPPHY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while JPPHY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and JPPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPPHY's competition here
MKIN vs JPHLF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check JPHLF's competition here
MKIN vs HSNGY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while HSNGY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check HSNGY's competition here
MKIN vs FCNCB Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while FCNCB trades at $1,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check FCNCB's competition here
MKIN vs PPERF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PPERF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check PPERF's competition here
MKIN vs PPERY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PPERY trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check PPERY's competition here
MKIN vs MLYBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while MLYBY trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and MLYBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYBY's competition here
MKIN vs GBOOF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while GBOOF trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check GBOOF's competition here
MKIN vs BKHYY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BKHYY trades at $94.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BKHYY's competition here
MKIN vs BKHPF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BKHPF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BKHPF's competition here
MKIN vs GBOOY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while GBOOY trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check GBOOY's competition here
MKIN vs SBGOF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SBGOF trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and SBGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBGOF's competition here
MKIN vs CKHGY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CKHGY trades at $96.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and CKHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKHGY's competition here
MKIN vs CGMBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CGMBF's competition here
MKIN vs SGBLY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SGBLY trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check SGBLY's competition here
MKIN vs RSNHF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while RSNHF trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and RSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSNHF's competition here
MKIN vs CMTDF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CMTDF trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CMTDF's competition here
MKIN vs CKHGF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check CKHGF's competition here
MKIN vs BDORY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BDORY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BDORY's competition here
MKIN vs SUTNY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SUTNY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check SUTNY's competition here
MKIN vs PBLOF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check PBLOF's competition here
MKIN vs MDIBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while MDIBY trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check MDIBY's competition here
MKIN vs BDOUF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and BDOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDOUF's competition here
MKIN vs MDIBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while MDIBF trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and MDIBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDIBF's competition here
MKIN vs BNCZF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNCZF's competition here
MKIN vs ISNPY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while ISNPY trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check ISNPY's competition here
MKIN vs AIBRF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while AIBRF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check AIBRF's competition here
MKIN vs AIBGY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while AIBGY trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check AIBGY's competition here
MKIN vs GPFOF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while GPFOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check GPFOF's competition here
MKIN vs GPFOY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPFOY's competition here
MKIN vs CIMDF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while CIMDF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and CIMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIMDF's competition here
MKIN vs BKPKF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BKPKF trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BKPKF's competition here
MKIN vs TKGBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while TKGBY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check TKGBY's competition here
MKIN vs SKCBY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check SKCBY's competition here
MKIN vs BPXXY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BPXXY trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BPXXY's competition here
MKIN vs OTPBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPBF's competition here
MKIN vs FCBBF Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FCBBF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while FCBBF trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas FCBBF's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FCBBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN and FCBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCBBF's competition here
MKIN vs BKRIY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while BKRIY trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check BKRIY's competition here
MKIN vs EGFEY Comparison August 2025
MKIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKIN stands at 14.8M. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKIN is priced at $13.75, while EGFEY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKIN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MKIN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKIN is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKIN.Check EGFEY's competition here