Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.
Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc. MIUFY Peers
See (MIUFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIUFY | $14.60 | +4.58% | 10.5B | 11.15 | $1.31 | +1.80% |
| AGRIP | $99.80 | +0.05% | 46.8B | 103.63 | $0.96 | N/A |
| ORXCF | $19.93 | N/A | 22.7B | 9.23 | $2.16 | +2.92% |
| MIUFF | $6.54 | -9.79% | 9.4B | 10.06 | $0.65 | +2.16% |
| EDNMF | $30.45 | N/A | 7.2B | 13.24 | $2.30 | +3.90% |
| EDNMY | $15.00 | -4.76% | 7.2B | 13.16 | $1.14 | +3.95% |
| FREJP | $18.20 | +1.00% | 4.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FREJO | $18.00 | +0.50% | 4.4B | -197.80 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| MAURY | $40.53 | -0.49% | 3.8B | 20.16 | $2.01 | +1.20% |
| CSASF | $19.89 | N/A | 3.1B | 6.54 | $3.04 | +0.03% |
Stock Comparison
MIUFY vs AGRIP Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AGRIP has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AGRIP trades at $99.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AGRIP's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGRIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AGRIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs ORXCF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ORXCF trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to ORXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs MIUFF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while MIUFF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and MIUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs EDNMF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while EDNMF trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs EDNMY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while EDNMY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to EDNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FREJP Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FREJP trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to FREJP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FREJO Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FREJO trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -197.80. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and FREJO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs MAURY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while MAURY trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and MAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CSASF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CSASF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CSASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs KGTHY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KGTHY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while KGTHY trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KGTHY's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGTHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to KGTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs CMPRF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CMPRF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CMPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs MAURF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while MAURF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs SHGKY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while SHGKY trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to SHGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs KRKKF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while KRKKF trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to KRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs ZIZTF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ZIZTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to ZIZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs EHMEF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while EHMEF trades at $112.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and EHMEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs AEOJF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AEOJF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to AEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs AIFLF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AIFLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs HYPOF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while HYPOF trades at $214.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to HYPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs UMTAF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and UMTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs AIFLY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AIFLY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AIFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs ZNKKY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 996.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ZNKKY trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and ZNKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs PRLPF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 939.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while PRLPF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and PRLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs EGTIF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 539.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while EGTIF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and EGTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs ECNCF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 533.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ECNCF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to ECNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FDCHF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 463.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FDCHF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and FDCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs ITJTY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ITJTY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and ITJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs INJJF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while INJJF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs IPFPF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 327.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while IPFPF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to IPFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs NECA Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while NECA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs GCSSF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and GCSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs HUNTF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while HUNTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs CHFHF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CHFHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to CHFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FPLPF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FPLPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs SEZNL Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and SEZNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CFNB Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CFNB trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CFNB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs IMMFF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while IMMFF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FAVO Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FAVO trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to FAVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs RYTTF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of +16.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and RYTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs FIGI Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FIGI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and FIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs ACCFF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ACCFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to ACCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs IOUFF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and IOUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs RMIAF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while RMIAF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs AMSA Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AMSA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AMSA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs MRBLF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FNNZF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FNNZF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FNNZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FNNZF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNNZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and FNNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs GWSFF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and GWSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs SPFX Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while SPFX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to SPFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs MITJF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while MITJF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITJF's ROE of -245.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to MITJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs PRPS Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while PRPS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to PRPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs ALEDY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ALEDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and ALEDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs KYNC Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while KYNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs MBDC Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while MBDC trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs XSHLF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs AIJTY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AIJTY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AIJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CUROQ Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CUROQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CHWWF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CHWWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CAFI Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CAFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs ATNPQ Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs COSG Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 458.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while COSG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and COSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CYIO Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 436.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CYIO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs CBRJ Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs CFGX Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CFGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CFGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs BCAP Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while BCAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and BCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs SUNLQ Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs ECDD Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 28.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ECDD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and ECDD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs FDTC Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 17.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FDTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and FDTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs ARWD Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while ARWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs YUANF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while YUANF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and YUANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs RAHGF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and RAHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs VIEWF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs EPOR Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while EPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and EPOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs RBRI Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while RBRI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBRI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to RBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs WORC Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WORC has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while WORC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas WORC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORC's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and WORC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs DKGH Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while DKGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and DKGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs GAFL Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while GAFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAFL's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs WEIDY Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to WEIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs FRNV Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FRNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRNV's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs CHFI Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 577. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CHFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHFI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs AATRL Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AATRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AATRL trades at $54.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AATRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AATRL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AATRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs FLXP Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FLXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while FLXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FLXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLXP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and FLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs CIAS Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CIAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while CIAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CIAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and CIAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs KTBA Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KTBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while KTBA trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KTBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KTBA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY is less volatile compared to KTBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIUFY.
MIUFY vs EPORP Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EPORP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while EPORP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EPORP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPORP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and EPORP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs TSLMF Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TSLMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while TSLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas TSLMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSLMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and TSLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MIUFY vs AWKS Comparison
MIUFY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIUFY stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AWKS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIUFY is priced at $14.60, while AWKS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIUFY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AWKS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MIUFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AWKS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIUFY and AWKS have similar daily volatility (0.00).