Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. MITSF Peers
See (MITSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MITSF | $21.25 | -1.39% | 61.1B | 10.32 | $2.06 | +3.19% |
| HTHIF | $30.73 | -4.10% | 147.3B | 37.85 | $0.85 | +0.97% |
| MTSUY | $20.69 | -0.29% | 83B | 13.13 | $1.59 | +2.64% |
| MSBHF | $20.72 | -0.34% | 82.7B | 13.07 | $1.59 | +3.26% |
| ITOCY | $108.57 | +0.14% | 77B | 13.11 | $8.29 | N/A |
| ITOCF | $56.04 | +5.20% | 76.6B | 13.06 | $4.14 | +2.51% |
| HTHIY | $31.25 | +1.40% | 71.8B | 36.48 | $0.86 | +0.66% |
| MITSY | $434.20 | +0.27% | 62.2B | 10.49 | $41.30 | +2.20% |
| CTPCF | $1.38 | +0.00% | 40.1B | 5.11 | $0.27 | +5.57% |
| CTPCY | $6.54 | +0.00% | 38.1B | 4.77 | $1.37 | +5.58% |
Stock Comparison
MITSF vs HTHIF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while HTHIF trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 37.85. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MTSUY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MTSUY trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MSBHF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MSBHF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ITOCY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ITOCY trades at $108.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ITOCF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ITOCF trades at $56.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs HTHIY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while HTHIY trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MITSY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MITSY trades at $434.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CTPCF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CTPCF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CTPCY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CTPCY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MARUF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MARUF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MARUY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MARUY trades at $210.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SSUMY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SSUMY trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SSUMF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SSUMF trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs PITAF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while PITAF trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CKHUF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CKHUF trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CKHUY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CKHUY trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs TYHOF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs HALMY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while HALMY trades at $89.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs HLMAF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while HLMAF trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs JMHLY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while JMHLY trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -34.73. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs JARLF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -34.22. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs GPOVY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs GPOVF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while GPOVF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KPELY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KPELY trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SWRAY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SWRAY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SWRAF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KPELF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KHOLY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KHOLY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -153.21. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SWRBF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SWRBF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SCRPF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SEIBF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MYTHF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MYTHY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MYTHY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs FCODF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while FCODF trades at $1,721.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 116.90. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SKSUY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SCVPF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs HYUHF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs AYYLF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs AYALY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while AYALY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs FOSUY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while FOSUY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BJINF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs AKAAF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while AKAAF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs JGSHF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BDVSY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BDVSY trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SZHFF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KHEXF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BDVSF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BDVSF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ALFFF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KTERF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KINUF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs FOSUF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while FOSUF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KBDCY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SMGBF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SMGBF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs NARRF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs GULRF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KBDCF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BLJZY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs GULRY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs IWTNF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SWRBY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MMSMY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MMSMY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs TINLF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs NLTBF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs TINLY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while TINLY trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SGHIF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SGHIY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CHCLY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs NICFF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MPCFF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs XZJCF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ALGGY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ALGGY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BNHUF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs NSHBY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while NSHBY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs GRGCF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while GRGCF trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SHMWF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 779.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SHMWF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ALGGF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs MTLZF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs INDHF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs KKRAF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs SBOX Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CVVIF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BRYAF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BEVFF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 380.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BEVFF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CEEIF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs TJSCF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs HGRVF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs DMCHY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs YMAIF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while YMAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs THAFF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs JGSMY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ICBT Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs NOBGF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs APTL Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while APTL trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs RSDEF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs ECSL Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs GTII Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while GTII trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs BNIGF Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs PRTT Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while PRTT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.
MITSF vs CIBY Comparison
MITSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITSF stands at 61.1B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, MITSF is priced at $21.25, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.32, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, MITSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITSF is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITSF.