PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FIYY trades at $103.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FFEU trades at $90.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VTIP trades at $50.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VTAPX trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VFSUX trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VFSTX trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VSBSX trades at $19.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VGSH trades at $58.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VWSTX trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ASBFX trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SCHO trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PTSHX trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FTSM trades at $59.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FNGU trades at $353.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VFISX trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SPTS trades at $29.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TMF trades at $38.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VSGDX trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VSGBX trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SPXL trades at $134.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JSDHX trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FLVCX trades at $36.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BITX trades at $52.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TBLL trades at $105.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TECL trades at $61.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FAS trades at $148.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PAIAX trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FSTTX trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DIAYX trades at $28.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DHLSX trades at $27.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DWT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PRFSX trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BASOX trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ACSNX trades at $9.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CPLSX trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 901.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BULZ trades at $112.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 896.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SH trades at $43.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 761.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TUA trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 733.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TAFI trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 729.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EXMAX trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 729.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EMAIX trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 720.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SOXS trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 709.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYVLX trades at $473.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 701.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PSQ trades at $38.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 695.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYCCX trades at $332.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 695.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYVYX trades at $473.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 630.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SVIX trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 600.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SVXY trades at $38.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 589.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JSCP trades at $46.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 584.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GDXU trades at $71.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 531.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SPXU trades at $22.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 529.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DPST trades at $76.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 519.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NUGT trades at $71.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 505.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BPIRX trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 503.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BPRRX trades at $13.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.20M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 490.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GIYAX trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 477.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NVDX trades at $8.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 447.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FSMB trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 421.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while KOLD trades at $20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 420.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SDS trades at $20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +7.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 398.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SPXS trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 397.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SDHY trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 397.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DXQLX trades at $82.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 381.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FNGO trades at $80.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 371.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DUST trades at $27.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 366.20M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FSHSX trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 354.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SEMRX trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MRRL trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FLGE trades at $809.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 293.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JNUG trades at $74.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 292.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UVXY trades at $27.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 283.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UUP trades at $27.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MORL trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 282.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while QID trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 265.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SMB trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 257.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TZA trades at $15.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 248.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NAIL trades at $52.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TENG trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 225.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while STOT trades at $47.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 220.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GGLL trades at $26.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 217.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GUSH trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 215.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FTSD trades at $90.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 209.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TWUSX trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while REML trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 203.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SDOW trades at $51.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 202.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RWM trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 201.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AMZU trades at $29.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 197.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FUMB trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 197.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while USDU trades at $26.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 193.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ERX trades at $48.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 176.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TMV trades at $38.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 171.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EMNT trades at $98.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 171.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DFEN trades at $34.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SPDN has a market cap of 168.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SPDN trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 168.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CVSB trades at $50.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 162.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CLSE trades at $22.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PULT has a market cap of 158.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PULT trades at $50.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PULT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CHAU has a market cap of 152.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CHAU trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHAU's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CHAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, QGLDX has a market cap of 151.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while QGLDX trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QGLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QGLDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to QGLDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MSFU has a market cap of 146.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MSFU trades at $39.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFU's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MSFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FSGIX has a market cap of 142.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FSGIX trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSGIX's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FSGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DOG has a market cap of 137.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DOG trades at $27.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NELCX has a market cap of 134.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NELCX trades at $49.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NELCX's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NELCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to NELCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UDN has a market cap of 134.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UDN trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NELAX has a market cap of 134.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NELAX trades at $56.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NELAX's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NELAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to NELAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NELIX has a market cap of 134.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NELIX trades at $58.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NELIX's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NELIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to NELIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GLL has a market cap of 132.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GLL trades at $11.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, OPER has a market cap of 130.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while OPER trades at $100.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPER's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to OPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BRZU has a market cap of 129.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BRZU trades at $59.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZU's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BRZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CEFL has a market cap of 121.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CEFL trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CEFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JSD has a market cap of 116.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JSD trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSD's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to JSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JOELX has a market cap of 115.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JOELX trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOELX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JOELX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to JOELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, OTCRX has a market cap of 115.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while OTCRX trades at $13.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTCRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTCRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to OTCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SCO has a market cap of 114.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SCO trades at $20.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GDXD has a market cap of 108.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GDXD trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXD's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GDXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FIGIX has a market cap of 104.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FIGIX trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FIGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FIGTX has a market cap of 104.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FIGTX trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FIGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DTO has a market cap of 104.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DTO trades at $56.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FAZ has a market cap of 99.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FAZ trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CEFZ has a market cap of 99.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CEFZ trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEFZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CEFZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FNGG has a market cap of 93.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FNGG trades at $155.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGG's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FNGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, VIXY has a market cap of 88.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while VIXY trades at $58.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to VIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 86.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AAPU trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, INDL has a market cap of 86.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while INDL trades at $56.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDL's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to INDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYHBX has a market cap of 85.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYHBX trades at $103.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYHBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYHBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYHBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, KORU has a market cap of 82.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while KORU trades at $43.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KORU's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KORU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to KORU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RMBIX has a market cap of 81.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RMBIX trades at $6.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBIX's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RMBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RMBFX has a market cap of 79.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RMBFX trades at $6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NRGD has a market cap of 79.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NRGD trades at $165.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGD's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRGD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NRGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TECS has a market cap of 78.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TECS trades at $43.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TECS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JDST has a market cap of 77.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JDST trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to JDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TARK has a market cap of 74.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TARK trades at $31.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TARK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TARK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TSLS has a market cap of 72.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TSLS trades at $8.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TSLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MLPQ has a market cap of 69.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MLPQ trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MLPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MIDU has a market cap of 68.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MIDU trades at $39.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDU's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BPLEX has a market cap of 68.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BPLEX trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPLEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to BPLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BPLSX has a market cap of 68.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BPLSX trades at $12.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPLSX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to BPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BITI has a market cap of 67.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BITI trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BITI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EDC has a market cap of 65.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EDC trades at $31.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDC's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MAGX has a market cap of 58.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MAGX trades at $32.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MAGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DXD has a market cap of 58.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DXD trades at $27.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DRN has a market cap of 58.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DRN trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRN's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ACDHX has a market cap of 50.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ACDHX trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACDHX's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to ACDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HDGE has a market cap of 50.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HDGE trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to HDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TYD has a market cap of 49.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TYD trades at $24.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PSH has a market cap of 48.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PSH trades at $49.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HIBL has a market cap of 47.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HIBL trades at $27.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIBL's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HIBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to HIBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LABD has a market cap of 46.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LABD trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LABD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LABD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LABD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DRV has a market cap of 46.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DRV trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GTAPX has a market cap of 43.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GTAPX trades at $13.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTAPX's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTAPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to GTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SARK has a market cap of 43.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SARK trades at $50.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SARK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SARK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CBLS has a market cap of 41.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CBLS trades at $27.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBLS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CBLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EURL has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EURL trades at $29.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURL's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EURL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DRIP has a market cap of 36.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DRIP trades at $11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AAPD has a market cap of 35.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AAPD trades at $18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AAPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GASL has a market cap of 34.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GASL trades at $6.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GASL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GASL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RLSFX has a market cap of 34.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RLSFX trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLSFX's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLSFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RLSFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RLSIX has a market cap of 34.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RLSIX trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLSIX's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RLSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EUO has a market cap of 34.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EUO trades at $29.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DBV has a market cap of 33.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DBV trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LBAY has a market cap of 32.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LBAY trades at $24.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBAY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, YGRN has a market cap of 32.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while YGRN trades at $40.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YGRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YGRN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to YGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, USLVF has a market cap of 31.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while USLVF trades at $33.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USLVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USLVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to USLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYCVX has a market cap of 31.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYCVX trades at $152.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYLDX has a market cap of 31.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYLDX trades at $153.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYLDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYLDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYCYX has a market cap of 30.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYCYX trades at $126.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYCYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, WBIL has a market cap of 30.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while WBIL trades at $30.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBIL's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to WBIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SNLN has a market cap of 30.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SNLN trades at $14.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SNLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ZSL has a market cap of 30.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ZSL trades at $31.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to ZSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, OILU has a market cap of 29.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while OILU trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILU's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OILU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to OILU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UTSL has a market cap of 28.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UTSL trades at $35.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTSL's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DVYL has a market cap of 28.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DVYL trades at $29.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DVYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SMHD has a market cap of 28.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SMHD trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMHD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SMHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NRGZ has a market cap of 28.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NRGZ trades at $19.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRGZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NRGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NVDS has a market cap of 27.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NVDS trades at $23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDS's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NVDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FIHD has a market cap of 27.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FIHD trades at $224.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIHD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FIHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TSL has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TSL trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MEXX has a market cap of 26.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MEXX trades at $15.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEXX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEXX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MEXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RUSL has a market cap of 25.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RUSL trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to RUSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MARNX has a market cap of 25.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MARNX trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MARNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to MARNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SHNY has a market cap of 24.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SHNY trades at $54.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RUSS has a market cap of 24.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RUSS trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to RUSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SMHB has a market cap of 24.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SMHB trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMHB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ADMQX has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ADMQX trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMQX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADMQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to ADMQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 22.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PPLC trades at $44.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, YCS has a market cap of 22.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while YCS trades at $41.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to YCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HIBS has a market cap of 22.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HIBS trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to HIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SRS has a market cap of 22.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SRS trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BDCL has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BDCL trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BDCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, KNAB has a market cap of 20.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while KNAB trades at $31.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to KNAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AAPB has a market cap of 18.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AAPB trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AAPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, WANT has a market cap of 18.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while WANT trades at $34.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WANT's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WANT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to WANT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LMLP has a market cap of 18.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LMLP trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DVHL has a market cap of 18.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DVHL trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVHL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DVHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EDZ has a market cap of 17.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EDZ trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BTFX has a market cap of 17.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BTFX trades at $50.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BTFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UWT has a market cap of 17.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UWT trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MLPR has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MLPR trades at $57.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GASX has a market cap of 17.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GASX trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GASX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HDLV has a market cap of 16.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HDLV trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDLV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to HDLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ERY has a market cap of 16.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ERY trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to ERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EFZ has a market cap of 16.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EFZ trades at $14.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EFZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CLDS has a market cap of 15.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CLDS trades at $38.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FEUL has a market cap of 15.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FEUL trades at $110.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEUL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEUL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FEUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, OILD has a market cap of 15.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while OILD trades at $15.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILD's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OILD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to OILD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UBIO has a market cap of 15.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UBIO trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PST has a market cap of 14.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PST trades at $23.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LBJ has a market cap of 14.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LBJ trades at $60.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LBJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DUG has a market cap of 14.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DUG trades at $40.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MSOX has a market cap of 14.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MSOX trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MSOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RWVG has a market cap of 14.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RWVG trades at $53.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to RWVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TPOR has a market cap of 13.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TPOR trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPOR's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PRTBX has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PRTBX trades at $66.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to PRTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DWSH has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DWSH trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DWSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BNKO has a market cap of 13.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BNKO trades at $41.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BNKZ has a market cap of 13.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BNKZ trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BNKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EUM has a market cap of 12.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EUM trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GNAF has a market cap of 12.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GNAF trades at $12.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MLPZ has a market cap of 12.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MLPZ trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MLPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, WTIU has a market cap of 12.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while WTIU trades at $8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTIU's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTIU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to WTIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SHRT has a market cap of 12.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SHRT trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHRT's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHRT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, USML has a market cap of 12.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while USML trades at $41.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to USML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UTRN has a market cap of 12.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UTRN trades at $29.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTRN's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTRN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, REK has a market cap of 11.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while REK trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to REK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RWGV has a market cap of 11.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RWGV trades at $86.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWGV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWGV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to RWGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SKF has a market cap of 11.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SKF trades at $36.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DPK has a market cap of 11.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DPK trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, IWDL has a market cap of 11.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while IWDL trades at $37.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to IWDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, IWFL has a market cap of 11.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while IWFL trades at $38.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to IWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BDCX has a market cap of 10.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BDCX trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BDCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SCDL has a market cap of 10.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SCDL trades at $34.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to SCDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BNKD has a market cap of 10.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BNKD trades at $18.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKD's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BNKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RYSRX has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RYSRX trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYSRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYSRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to RYSRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LBDC has a market cap of 10.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LBDC trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SDYL has a market cap of 9.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SDYL trades at $85.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SDYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DZK has a market cap of 9.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DZK trades at $44.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DZK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DZK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FCSH has a market cap of 9.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FCSH trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to FCSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SEF has a market cap of 9.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SEF trades at $33.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HDLB has a market cap of 9.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HDLB trades at $15.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDLB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to HDLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CEFD has a market cap of 9.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CEFD trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CEFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ONG has a market cap of 8.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ONG trades at $28.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONG's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to ONG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DRR has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DRR trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, ESNG has a market cap of 8.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while ESNG trades at $70.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to ESNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FINU has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FINU trades at $24.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FINU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MYY has a market cap of 8.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MYY trades at $19.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MNM has a market cap of 8.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MNM trades at $29.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNM's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AMJL has a market cap of 8.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AMJL trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMJL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMJL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AMJL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MIDZ has a market cap of 6.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MIDZ trades at $74.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIDZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MSFD has a market cap of 6.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MSFD trades at $12.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MSFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, RALS has a market cap of 6.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while RALS trades at $33.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RALS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RALS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to RALS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TAWK has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TAWK trades at $42.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TAWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EUFL has a market cap of 5.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EUFL trades at $11.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EUFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BZQ has a market cap of 5.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BZQ trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CLDL has a market cap of 5.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CLDL trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLDL's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CLDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PPSC has a market cap of 5.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PPSC trades at $28.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, WEIX has a market cap of 5.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while WEIX trades at $26.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to WEIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SILX has a market cap of 5.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SILX trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SILX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SILX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SILX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SBB has a market cap of 5.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SBB trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, REW has a market cap of 5.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while REW trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to REW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, STAX has a market cap of 5.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while STAX trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to STAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GGLS has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GGLS trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EQLS has a market cap of 4.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EQLS trades at $22.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to EQLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, IWML has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while IWML trades at $16.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to IWML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EWV has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EWV trades at $35.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SWAR has a market cap of 4.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SWAR trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWAR's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWAR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SWAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, USOD has a market cap of 4.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while USOD trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USOD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USOD's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to USOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FINZ has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FINZ trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FINZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NEED has a market cap of 4.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NEED trades at $32.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, YXI has a market cap of 4.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while YXI trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YXI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to YXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, OOTO has a market cap of 3.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while OOTO trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOTO's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OOTO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to OOTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AMZD has a market cap of 3.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AMZD trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AMZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NRGO has a market cap of 3.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NRGO trades at $15.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DGLDF has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DGLDF trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGLDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGLDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TAAG has a market cap of 3.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TAAG trades at $20.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to TAAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SMDD has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SMDD trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SMDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LRET has a market cap of 3.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LRET trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LRET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, KLNE has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while KLNE trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLNE's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLNE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to KLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EVAV has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EVAV trades at $21.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVAV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, OAIB has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while OAIB trades at $21.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OAIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OAIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to OAIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DOZR has a market cap of 3.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DOZR trades at $30.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOZR's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOZR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DOZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EVEN has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EVEN trades at $19.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVEN's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to EVEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, WTID has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while WTID trades at $17.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTID's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to WTID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PASS has a market cap of 2.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PASS trades at $37.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PASS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PASS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MUTE has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MUTE trades at $45.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUTE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MUTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FNTC has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FNTC trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTC's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DEUR has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DEUR trades at $28.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DEUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HOML has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HOML trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to HOML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JETD has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JETD trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JETD's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to JETD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DAG has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DAG trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PYPT has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PYPT trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PYPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SETH has a market cap of 2.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SETH trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SETH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FNGZ has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FNGZ trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FNGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, JETU has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while JETU trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JETU's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to JETU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UEUR has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UEUR trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UEUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SDD has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SDD trades at $17.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PPMC has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PPMC trades at $22.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PPMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PPDM has a market cap of 1.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PPDM trades at $21.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPDM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PPDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SDP has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SDP trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BDCY has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BDCY trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FATT has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FATT trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FATT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, WDRW has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while WDRW trades at $40.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to WDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UCHF has a market cap of 1.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UCHF trades at $23.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UCHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, CARD has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while CARD trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARD's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CARD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to CARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, XCOM has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while XCOM trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to XCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MZZ has a market cap of 1.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MZZ trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MZZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UGBP has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UGBP trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGBP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UGBP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UGBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, GDXS has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while GDXS trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to GDXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SMN has a market cap of 1.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SMN trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, EFU has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while EFU trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to EFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LMLB has a market cap of 1.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LMLB trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMLB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LMLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DSLVF has a market cap of 1.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DSLVF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSLVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSLVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DSLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PYPS has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PYPS trades at $39.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UJPY has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UJPY trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UJPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UJPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DAUD has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DAUD trades at $26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAUD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAUD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DAUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SIJ has a market cap of 926433.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SIJ trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SIJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MJIN has a market cap of 920079.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MJIN trades at $15.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MJIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MJIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PFES has a market cap of 897818.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PFES trades at $51.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PFES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UAUD has a market cap of 897633.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UAUD trades at $15.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAUD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UAUD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UAUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DGBP has a market cap of 882258.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DGBP trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGBP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGBP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DGBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NKEQ has a market cap of 855588.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NKEQ trades at $28.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKEQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NKEQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NKEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DJPY has a market cap of 817588.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DJPY trades at $19.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DJPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BDD has a market cap of 780056.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BDD trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to BDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DCHF has a market cap of 715170.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DCHF trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to DCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SZK has a market cap of 709023.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SZK trades at $11.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SZK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, MJXL has a market cap of 652139.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while MJXL trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MJXL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to MJXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SCOM has a market cap of 622202.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SCOM trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, LACK has a market cap of 586215.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while LACK trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LACK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LACK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to LACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, DYY has a market cap of 575154.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while DYY trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to DYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, PFEL has a market cap of 502301.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while PFEL trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFEL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to PFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NKEL has a market cap of 462202.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NKEL trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NKEL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NKEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, URR has a market cap of 438121.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while URR trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to URR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, YCOM has a market cap of 388662.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while YCOM trades at $15.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YCOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to YCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, BOM has a market cap of 287045.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while BOM trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to BOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TVIXF has a market cap of 275337.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TVIXF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TVIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVIXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to TVIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, AWYX has a market cap of 256974.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while AWYX trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWYX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to AWYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, SINV has a market cap of 127482.00. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while SINV trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to SINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, TPS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while TPS trades at $24.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to TPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, FRLG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while FRLG trades at $300.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRLG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to FRLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, NRGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while NRGU trades at $502.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGU's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to NRGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, UGAZF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while UGAZF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGAZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UGAZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is less volatile compared to UGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.

MINT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MINT stands at 13.16B. In comparison, HZRZF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MINT is priced at $100.20, while HZRZF trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MINT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HZRZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINT is more volatile compared to HZRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINT.